Who Will Replace Harry Potter?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

In brightest day, in blackest night,
No evil shall escape my sight,
Let those who worship evil's might,
Beware my power ... Green Lantern's light!
-- The Green Lantern oath, per the DC Comics character.

Lord Voldemort is a mightier villain than Parallax. Hogwarts is a better training ground than Oa. Albus Dumbledore is a better mentor than Kilowog. And Green Lantern is no Harry Potter. So say this past weekend's box office results.

According to Box Office Mojo, Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX  ) newest and arguably biggest superhero epic -- sporting a $200 million production budget -- brought in just $53.2 million from weekend screenings at more than 3,800 theaters. The implication? With this summer's Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 concluding the series, Warner has yet to find an heir apparent to J.K. Rowling's boy wizard.

Green Lantern was never meant to fill that gap alone. How could it? Just look at what the Harry Potter films have done at the box office over the years:


Release Date

Worldwide Gross

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone Nov. 16, 2001 $974.7 million
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets Nov. 16, 2002 $878.6 million
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban June 4, 2004 $795.6 million
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire Nov. 18, 2005 $895.9 million
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix July 11, 2007 $938.2 million
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince July 15, 2009 $933.9 million
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 Nov. 19, 2010 $954.5 million
TOTAL -- $6,371.4 million
AVERAGE -- $910.2 million

Source: Box Office Mojo.

You don't replace a $6 billion franchise with just one character. Fortunately, that's not what Warner planned. DC Entertainment, like comic book peer and Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) unit Marvel, has thousands of characters to work with. One, Batman, has been a box-office performer since the late 1980s.

More recently, Christopher Nolan's interpretation of the character -- including 2005's Batman Begins and 2008 megahit The Dark Knight -- has yielded nearly $1.4 billion in global box office receipts. Green Lantern won't get anywhere close to that. More likely, it'll fit in the middle of DC's middling comics-to-movie franchise. Here's a rundown of the past decade's debuts:


Release Date

Worldwide Gross

Catwoman July 23, 2004 $82.1 million
Constantine Feb. 18, 2005 $230.9 million
Batman Begins June 15, 2005 $372.7 million
V for Vendetta March 17, 2006 $132.5 million
Superman Returns June 28, 2006 $391.1 million
The Dark Knight July 18, 2008 $1,001.9 million
Watchmen March 6, 2009 $185.3 million
The Losers April 23, 2010 $29.4 million
Jonah Hex June 18, 2010 $10.9 million
Red October 15, 2010 $186.6 million
TOTAL -- $2,623.4 million
AVERAGE -- $262.3 million

Source: Box Office Mojo.

Talk about a huge gap. Up till now, the average DC-inspired film has produced 29% of the receipts of the average Harry Potter film. More tellingly, the top getter from DC Comics' Hollywood history -- The Dark Knight -- grossed more than twice the No. 2 getter, 1989's Batman, which took in $411.3 million worldwide. Both films star the same character.

Warner badly needs to branch out, and it needs to do so with characters to which it already owns the rights. That's why Green Lantern was given so much leeway. But while Marvel's characters continue to produce profits for not just Disney, but also News Corp.'s (Nasdaq: NWS  ) 20th Century Fox with the X-Men films , and Sony (NYSE: SNE  ) with the Spider-Man films, DC hasn't yet figured out how to bring more characters to the big screen. Green Lantern was the first of what should be many tries.

As an investor, I can't quibble with the plan. My sons liked Green Lantern. So did I, for the most part. The script suffered from bad writing in several spots, but on the whole, there's enough story here to produce a sequel. One that should cost less, feature a single screenwriter, and spend more time exploring the mythology of the fictional Green Lantern Corps and less time with one-liners that do nothing to explain the main character's motivation to, you know, save the world.

The effort would be worth it. Why? Good comic book-inspired storytelling has a way of producing profits. Cablevision's (NYSE: CVC  ) Rainbow Media, which is anchored by the AMC channel, saw operating profit increase 18% last year on the strength of AMC's The Walking Dead, an adaption of Robert Kirkman's long-running comic book series of the same name. Green Lantern isn't likely to do the same for Time Warner.

Yet while it might look like the blackest night has already enveloped DC and Warner, I believe the search to find the next Harry Potter has only just begun. Do you agree? Disagree? Weigh in using the comments box below. You can also add Time Warner to your watchlist for comprehensive coverage of the stock.

Or, if you're interested in other ways to profit from Hollywood's fickle fascination with big heroes, take a minute to watch this free video right now. You'll walk away with an idea from our Motley Fool Stock Advisor scorecard that's positioned to profit no matter who lights up the silver screen.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team. He owned shares of Time Warner and Walt Disney at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Twitter as @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1510162, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/22/2016 7:45:14 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 22 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:01 PM
TWX $89.48 Up +6.49 +7.82%
Time Warner CAPS Rating: ***
CVC.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Cablevision System… CAPS Rating: *
DIS $93.03 Up +1.00 +1.09%
Walt Disney CAPS Rating: *****
FOX $25.91 Up +0.55 +2.17%
Twenty-First Centu… CAPS Rating: ***
SNE $32.11 Down -0.61 -1.86%
Sony CAPS Rating: ***