Rising Star Buy: Western Refining Still Looks Cheap

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

This article is part of our Rising Star Portfolios series.

My first purchase of small oil refiner Western Refining (NYSE: WNR  ) in my Rising Star portfolio has turned out to be a good one, so far. Shares are up some 30% since I purchased them a month and a half ago. Instead of cashing out, though -- we're not short-term traders here at The Motley Fool -- I'm going to add to the position. Here's why:

The spread between prices of Brent oil and West Texas Intermediate, or WTI, oil is about $20 per barrel (Brent being more expensive) and is expected to stay there for at least the next year or two. In fact, it recently hit a record of $23 per barrel. One analyst thinks it could go as high as $50 per barrel by next spring.

This is a catalyst for Western Refining shares because Western Refining doesn't buy oil tied to the Brent price; it uses oil tied to the WTI price. However, it sells its refined products -- gasoline, diesel, aviation fuel, etc. -- at prices determined by the more expensive Brent price. And that means more profit for Western Refining. Do I have to draw it out further? With more profit, a higher share price should follow.

Western Refining, CVR Energy (NYSE: CVI  ) , and HollyFrontier (NYSE: HFC  ) all use WTI oil, and all three have seen substantial share price increases -- 75% to 90% year-to-date -- since the Brent/WTI spread became large early this year. Valero (NYSE: VLO  ) , the largest independent refiner in the U.S., has seen a much smaller price increase of about 10%.

Why and how long?
There are two questions investors need to answer, then. First, why is there such a disparity between the two oil prices when the historical difference has been just a few dollars and with WTI usually being more expensive? Second, how long will this price difference last?

The reason for the disparity comes down to Economics 101 -- supply and demand. There's too much oil coming to Cushing, Okla., where WTI oil is delivered. There is a lack, right now, of ways to move that oil toward refineries on the Gulf of Mexico and the East Coast. Plus, Brent oil's supply is being crimped with the civil war going on in Libya.

The inability to move the oil from Cushing to Gulf Coast refineries is expected to last for up to a couple of years, but it could be longer. The TransCanada (NYSE: TRP  ) "Keystone XL" pipeline could operate by late 2013, but it's facing several hurdles including approval from the Environmental Protection Agency. Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD  ) and Energy Transfer Partners (NYSE: ETP  ) operate the "Double E" pipeline, which could reverse its flow direction. However, traders dealing in the physical commodity have been slow to commit to such a reversal.

Rail is an alternative, but there's a lack of tanker rail cars, and refineries on the Gulf Coast aren't really set up to receive oil that way, though companies are working on those problems. A new rail terminal at Port Arthur, Texas, for example, should be completed by mid-2012.

Even if oil can be moved out of Cushing, will that be enough to close the spread? Some don't think so because of increased production from oil shale fields such as Bakken in North Dakota, which is contributing to the oversupply at Cushing in the first place.

Purchasing shares
Of the three refiners benefiting from the Brent/WTI spread I called out above, Western Refining has the lowest growth expectations priced in, as shown below.


TTM Free Cash Flow

Priced-In Expectations*

CVR Energy $138 million 18.5% / 9.3% / 0%
HollyFrontier $248 million 17.3% / 8.6% / 0%
Western Refining $207 million 5.7% / 2.8% / 0%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author calculations. TTM = trailing 12 months.
*Shown as annual growth of FCF for first five years, next five years, and terminal growth, discounted at 15%, where the predicted price of the DCF model equals the last closing price.

As you can see, the market is expecting little growth from Western Refining, especially when compared with the other two. If Western Refining actually had priced-in expectations of 18%/9%/0% (splitting the difference), it would be priced at $37, some 83% higher than it is now.

Tomorrow, I'll purchase another $350 of Western Refining to increase the position in my Messed-Up Expectations portfolio to a mid-level 4%.

After adding Western Refining to My Watchlist, come discuss the company and the refining industry at the MUE discussion board.

This article is part of our Rising Star Portfolios series, where we give some of our most promising stock analysts cold, hard cash to manage on the Fool's behalf. We'd like you to track our performance and benefit from these real-money, real-time free stock picks. See all of our Rising Star analysts (and their portfolios).

Fool analyst Jim Mueller owns shares of Western Refining, but not of any other company mentioned. He's an analyst for the Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter service.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Western Refining. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Enterprise Products Partners and TransCanada. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is never messed up.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2011, at 4:56 PM, jtepsick wrote:

    This stock will be 60 dollars in two years.

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2011, at 11:56 PM, busterbuddy wrote:

    I prefer ETP and enbridge EEP. I'd like to invest in ETE but don't understand why I'd give up the ETP yield to invest in it. Don't think growth is going to be the answer.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1526882, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2016 9:57:49 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,208.51 -14.52 -0.08%
S&P 500 2,149.89 -1.44 -0.07%
NASD 5,307.07 -2.76 -0.05%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/25/2016 9:42 AM
WNR $30.07 Up +0.09 +0.28%
Western Refining CAPS Rating: ****
CVI $15.09 Up +0.15 +1.00%
CVR Energy CAPS Rating: ***
EPD $26.73 Up +0.01 +0.05%
Enterprise Product… CAPS Rating: *****
ETP $36.82 Down -0.05 -0.14%
Energy Transfer Pa… CAPS Rating: ***
HFC $24.81 Up +0.28 +1.14%
HollyFrontier CAPS Rating: ****
TRP $46.11 Down -0.16 -0.35%
TransCanada CAPS Rating: *****
VLO $57.68 Up +1.52 +2.71%
Valero Energy CAPS Rating: ****