NetApp: Cheaper Than You Think

NetApp (Nasdaq: NTAP  ) may be cheaper than you think.

In the daily noise machine of CNBC, analyst estimates, and quarterly announcements, investors are inundated with talking heads obsessing over earnings-per-share figures.

Earnings, or net income, is an accounting construction that is the basis for the price-to-earnings ratio, the most popular way of measuring how cheap or expensive a stock is.

But free cash flow -- the amount of cash a company earns on its operations minus what it spends on them -- is another, oftentimes more accurate measure of earnings that can give you an advantage.

How NetApp stacks up                                      
If NetApp tends to generate more free cash flow than net income, there's a good chance earnings-per-share figures understate its profitability and overstate its price tag. Conversely, if NetApp consistently generates less free cash flow than net income, it may be less profitable and more expensive than it appears.

This graph compares NetApp's historical net income with free cash flow. (I omitted various gains and charges such as tax deferrals, restructurings, and benefits related to stock options.)

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author's calculations.

As you can see, NetApp has a tendency to produce more free cash flow than net income. This means that the standard price-to-earnings multiple investors use to judge companies may overstate its price tag.

There can be a variety of reasons to disregard such a discrepancy; for example, free cash flow can overstate earnings in businesses with volatile working capital needs, or understate earnings in high growth companies that are reinvesting capital in the business.

Alternatively, in cases where free cash flow more accurately measures earnings, such a discrepancy can indicate a company that is more -- or less -- expensive than investors realize.

Let's examine NetApp alongside some of its peers for additional context.

Company

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

Adjusted Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio

NetApp 23.8 19.2
EMC (NYSE: EMC  ) 22.4 19.3
Symantec (Nasdaq: SYMC  ) 20.3 8.3
IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) 13.3 13.5

On a P/E basis, NetApp looks slightly pricier than its peers.

While NetApp is still more expensive than its peers on a free cash flow basis, the company consistently generates more free cash flow than net income, and its free cash flow multiple is less expensive than its earnings multiple, suggesting that NetApp's stock might be somewhat cheaper than many investors realize.

If you'd like to stay up to speed on the top news and analysis on NetApp or any other stock, simply add it to your stock watchlist. If you don't have one yet, you can create a watchlist of your favorite stocks.

Ilan Moscovitz doesn't own shares of any company mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of IBM and EMC. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2011, at 12:22 PM, TheNumberis42 wrote:

    OK, NetApp may be "cheaper than many investors realize", but by the same measures it appears that Symantec is WAY cheaper. Its P-FCF ratio is less than half its PE ratio. Seems like it would stand out as the one to highlight in this article.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2011, at 3:44 PM, tommyretro wrote:

    Now it's really a lot cheaper than you think. Another great trading idea from the Fool (just like the article that trumpeted MIPS' upside a few weeks ago).

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1540225, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/22/2014 2:46:45 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement