Just Like That, Oracle Loses $1.3 Billion

SAP (NYSE: SAP  ) finally caught a break. A judge has ruled that the German software maker can pay $272 million to Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) for ill-gotten gains derived from a 2007 security breach. A jury had awarded $1.3 billion in a trial that concluded last November.

The ruling -- issued Thursday by Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif. -- called the original award "grossly excessive" in light of the evidence presented, The New York Times reported.

For its part, Oracle said it would fight for the entire $1.3 billion. SAP, meanwhile, appears relieved to have found a sympathetic ear.

"We believed the jury's verdict was wrong and are pleased with the significant reduction in damages," the company said in a statement. "We are hopeful that this ruling will move the case toward an appropriate final resolution."

Wishful thinking? I think so. Oracle has never granted mercy to its enemies and SAP has long ranked up there with Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) on CEO Larry Ellison's hit list.

There's also the uncertainty principle to consider. No, not the quantum mechanics theory that says it's impossible to simultaneously measure the velocity and position of a subatomic particle, but rather the idea that litigation distracts from innovation and worries customers. More worry means more opportunity for Oracle to poach clients.

Sound harsh? Too much like a conspiracy theory? Maybe both. Just remember that Ellison is well-known for doing whatever he must to win, even if that means digging through Microsoft's trash, issuing personal attacks on competing executives, or hiring ethically questionable executives who possess an otherwise good record for making moola.

SAP can breathe a sigh of relief for now, but this battle isn't even close to over. Do you agree? Disagree? Please weigh in using the comments box below. You can also keep tabs on Oracle's war with SAP by adding these companies to your Foolish watchlist:

Fool contributorTim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team. He owned shares of Oracle at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Google+ or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insightsdelivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Oracle and Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of and creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 04, 2011, at 2:35 AM, PCPrecaution1 wrote:

    The ONLY reason to incorporate is to limit liability. The State or government contracts with corporations guaranteeing them a limited amount of liability. Corporate lawyers have just gotten too greedy. Our younger generatons do not take heed. They do not have the experience it takes to make good judgment. Judges are totally imune from any liability. She probaby qualifies for one of those $12,000 interest back if you have up to $750,000 Mortgage. A million dollars is like a $100,000 was before 2008. No one takes any responsibility for anything any more. No one knows what they are doing. I sure hope Fool's Rules is able to prevail. Judges are what ruined the democratic system of what ever kind of government we have now. Hat's off to anyone fighting for their rights. At least Fool's Rules won! in the first place! That by it's self is a win for everyone.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1548383, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/22/2014 12:01:44 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement