Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



The One Threat to Keep Apple Investors Awake at Night

The following video is part of our "Motley Fool Conversations" series, in which Motley Fool senior technology analyst Eric Bleeker and chief technology officer Jeremy Phillips discuss emerging trends in technology.

If you're looking for other stock ideas, look no further than The Motley Fool’s new free report, "The Hottest IPO of 2011." The free report lists one recent IPO set to take off thanks to its leadership in booming Latin American markets. To get instant access to the report, just click here now.

Neither Eric Bleeker nor Jeremy Phillips owns shares of any companies listed above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, Microsoft, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple, Google, Adobe Systems, and Microsoft, creating bull call spread positions in Apple and Microsoft, and creating a diagonal call position in Adobe Systems. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (11)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 6:03 PM, tzmmtz wrote:

    Sorry guys but you have no idea what you are talking about. There is no revenue here worth worrying about in the short term. Anything down the road Apple will be there to capture whatever amount they feel then need.

    By the way, they do make money in other ways. If this is what you worry about at night.... find another line of work!

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 7:29 PM, TMFRhino wrote:

    Did you.... watch the video? The whole point was that there isn't a short term revenue concern (as you indicate the opinion was). The "keep Apple investors awake at night" part was HTML 5 diminishing the "moat" App Stores have created in the long run.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 9:21 PM, tzmmtz wrote:

    Yes.... I watched the video, which by the way could have been stated in 60 seconds vs 6 minutes. The consumers making money for Apple don't give a hoot about the Financial Times. Content such as this and for that matter most other forms of it will never be able to charge much, if anything, to the general population. They simply won't pay for it. Now or years from now. There is no money in selling paid apps such as the Financial Times on a mass level.

    If publishers want to survive the electronic age, as paper becomes a dinosaur, they better find other ways of delivering their information for free or for very little. I'm surprised so few in the advertising world haven't adopted to targeting the individual with the commercials they are interested in watching.

    Someone will do it and that's when we will see the big money roll in.....

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 10:35 PM, reeshau wrote:

    Very interesting to see someone from "old media" say enough is enough. Also poetic to see Apple hoisted by their own HTML 5 petard, while Adobe seems unconcerned about a Flash competitor and is getting on with what they do best--making great design software.

    Apple is still formidable, of course, but it is interesting just to find a boundary to their power. It is also interesting to speculate that Google may be steering this back to their core business

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 11:11 PM, TMFDukenewkirk wrote:

    This is precisely the biggest aspect of Jobs' led AAPL that I have personally despised as a 'potential' (hardly though) customer. I often refer to the blind love of Apple being a great mystery to me. One of the greatest things to have hurt Microsoft over the last decade, well particularly up to the anti-trust attack on them was this attempt to control everything. While Microsoft was a constant target of attack for this modus operendi, Jobs, clearly displaying a special talent, has been able to convince the world that Apple is somehow the good guy giving the people what they determine the people need. I'd say we'd be seriously ignoring some not too distant history by simply dismissing these concerns. Microsoft wasn't always the hated, evil giant, and certainly isn't the one walking around with the big stick these days.

    The attitude of ....

    <The consumers making money for Apple don't give a hoot about the Financial Times.> better not be the attitude Apple is taking, as they will eventually rue the day they became too big for their britches, if that's already the case.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2011, at 11:32 PM, TMFMoby wrote:

    tzmmtz - Our primary point is that the revenue Apple generates from the apps is meaningless next to the damage losing big name publishers like FT does to the platform.

    In other words, if there's a mass exodus of publishers on Apple's platform, they may not be able to sell the next iDevice as readily, because the content providers are not there to fill up the platform.


  • Report this Comment On September 12, 2011, at 8:14 PM, mixtup wrote:

    Very interesting and insightful thoughts here. Personally it took me a long time to get into smart phones, because I felt and still feel that apps are just crippled versions of web counterparts.

    Sort of reminds me of AOL, which I didn't ever use, but sounds like it was a flitered pseudo-internet that the company controlled.

    In the end the open way won out and now we can do a lot on our browsers. I finally see a way this can happen on smartphones (HTML5).

    From an investing perspective, though, I agree it's not an immediate danger, but a trend worth watching and investing in.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1548566, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2016 5:32:05 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,169.27 -53.76 -0.30%
S&P 500 2,143.16 -8.17 -0.38%
NASD 5,283.40 -26.43 -0.50%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/25/2016 4:00 PM
AAPL $118.25 Up +0.60 +0.51%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
ADBE $109.03 Down -1.78 -1.61%
Adobe Systems CAPS Rating: **
GOOGL $828.55 Down -7.19 -0.86%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
MSFT $60.99 Down -0.01 -0.02%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****