The headlines will tell you that subsidies for renewable energy are outrageously high and like throwing money down the drain. But outside of some poor decisions (ahem, Solyndra), subsidies for renewable energy have been effective at lowering costs and require very little money from the government.
When you compare renewable subsidies to the growth stages of oil and gas, coal, nuclear energy, and biofuels, it becomes apparent that we're nowhere near the support we gave to those energy sources. In a study done by Nancy Pfund and Ben Healey for DBL Investors (link opens PDF), some interesting statistics emerge.
- In its first 15 years, "nuclear subsidies accounted for more than 1% of the federal budget."
- Over the same time frame, oil and gas subsidies accounted for half a percent of the budget.
- Renewable energy currently gets about one-tenth of one percent in subsidies from the federal government.
This relatively paltry amount of funding has helped create an industry that now employs more than 93,500 workers and is growing at 66%. China's government has also provided a boost to renewables by giving cheap loans to manufacturers such as LDK Solar
So when you hear about First Solar
Level the playing field
None of this is to say that renewable energy should get more subsidies. Only to point out that the small amount of subsidies currently given to wind, solar, and other renewable sources are a drop in the bucket compared to energy sources we now take for granted.
One of government's responsibilities is to direct energy investment to the source that is in our best long-term interest. With costs falling rapidly, domestic jobs growing, and environmental impact minimal, why wouldn't the government help push renewable energy along?
Agree or disagree? Sound off in the comments section below.
Keep up with solar stock news by adding your favorite stocks to My Watchlist and signing up for My Fool Daily. It's our free daily email with articles from the companies you choose.