Recs

22

Warren Buffett Gave Me This Stock Tip

What would a stock tip directly from the Warren Buffett be worth to you? Ten days ago, that's exactly what he gave me -- and all of us. How did I come about this valuable information? The same way you did: he announced it publicly. Despite this, investors appear steadfast about ignoring this opportunity. Are you willing to seize it?

The stock is Buffett's own company, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) . My guess is that you're now thinking two things. No. 1, it's boring. No. 2, the opportunity has already vanished. The news is out that Buffett is willing to repurchase Berkshire shares, and it's already baked into the price.

Think again.

I can't argue with the first point: Berkshire is boring. What of it? Investors who find that quality objectionable need to ask themselves if they are in this game for excitement or to make money. The second point, on the other hand, is flat wrong. The value is still there and it has been every day since the announcement. This isn't guesswork; I'm convinced that's the case and I'm basing my assessment on Buffett's own words.

What exactly did Buffett say?
In the press release announcing the new buyback program, Berkshire management was explicit concerning their belief that the shares are significantly undervalued:

Our Board of Directors has authorized Berkshire Hathaway to repurchase Class A and Class B shares of Berkshire at prices no higher than a 10% premium over the then-current book value of the shares. In the opinion of our Board and management, the underlying businesses of Berkshire are worth considerably more than this amount, though any such estimate is necessarily imprecise.

As soon as the press release was issued, 1.1 times book value ($72.40 per B share) should immediately have become a hard floor on the share price. Instead, that benchmark figure roughly acted as a ceiling on the price!

Date

Price-to-Book Value Multiple (intraday high)

Announcement date: Monday, Sept. 26

1.10

Tuesday, Sept. 27

1.13

Wednesday, Sept. 28

1.10

Thursday, Sept. 29

1.11

Friday, Sept. 30

1.10

Monday, Oct. 3

1.10

Tuesday, Oct. 4

1.12

Wednesday, Oct. 5

1.12

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Let me sum up the table in a single sentence: No matter what price you paid for the shares since the buyback announcement, Buffett has explicitly said they are worth "considerably more."

If not now, when?
I've been pitching Berkshire shares hard since the beginning of August. Over the next 10 years, I think they'll smash the S&P500 (INDEX: ^GSPC). Let me qualify what I mean by "smash": The margin of outperformance will exceed five percentage points on an annualized basis. I can't offer any stronger evidence for their undervaluation than a direct endorsement from Warren Buffett. If you're not interested in owning the shares today, you may as well decide now that you will never own them.

Of course, perhaps you already have a full (or even overweight) position in Berkshire Hathaway. If that's the case, let me give you a few other ideas. Indeed, Berkshire is only the most prominent case of wonderful businesses selling at a meaningful discount to their intrinsic value. Here are a few other examples:

Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) is one of the world's largest enterprise software companies, with a massive installed base, including every Fortune 100 company. Once Oracle gets in, they become part of the fabric of their customers' operations and are very difficult to dislodge. You can own a piece of this business today for less than 12 times estimated earnings for the next 12 months.

M&T Bank (NYSE: MTB  ) is a superbly run regional bank -- Berkshire owns shares in its portfolio. The shares are trading at an insignificant premium to book value and less than 10 times forward earnings. All of this also applies to national lender Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) . I believe both stocks are undervalued; nevertheless, I would hold off on buying them now as there will almost certainly be better opportunities to pick up bank stocks cheaply as the European crisis unfolds. You should be tracking them, though.

Everyone knows that Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) is good for the glue factory, correct? I beg to differ: In the past 12 months ending June 30, this "nag" managed to grow operating income by 11%. That's not the same growth as in the glory days, but the company still has a fair few good years in front of it, and those prospects more than justify a forward earnings multiple below 9.

If you invest in individual stocks and you have cash on hand that you won't be needing over the next several years, this is a good environment in which to add top-flight businesses to your portfolio at better than reasonable prices. Berkshire Hathaway should be at the top of your shopping list. Investors who are able to see beyond the mid-term difficulties affecting our economy will very likely reap the rewards. Those who aren't will eventually come to regret it, particularly since the broad market will probably underperform historical returns over the next five to 10 years.

More ideas? The Motley Fool's best analysts have identified great companies that let you decide how to spend your profits in our special free report, "13 High-Yielding Stocks to Buy Today."

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Alex Dumortier holds no position in any company mentioned. Click here to see his holdings and a short bio. You can follow him on Twitter. The Motley Fool owns shares of Oracle, Microsoft, Wells Fargo, and Berkshire Hathaway, and has created a ratio put spread position on Wells Fargo. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Microsoft, as well as creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 06, 2011, at 9:40 PM, karlm1 wrote:

    Since 1965 Berkshire has increased BV by an average of 20.2% VS 9.4% for the S&P including dividends a 10.8% advantage. Of coarse the last 10 years this has slowed down. Since 2001 the average is 9.4% VS 3.64% in the S&P with dividends. He has stated that he will pay a dividend when over a rolling 5 year period Berkshire has not beaten the S&P. From 2006-2010 Berkshire has increased BV by a 10% average VS 2.3% for the S&P. I wouldn't expect a dividend any time soon. Anybody who owns the stock should be thrilled to have Warren manage the profits. I think that 1.5 to 2 times BV may be intrinsic value but I don't think it will trade at those levels. Because everyone is sooo smart they will feel stupid paying more than Warren would pay. They would rather buy XYZ stock at bubble prices. I believe it will trade close to 1.1 BV. Going forward but it will still advance faster than the S&P

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Shtoky wrote:

    How do you invest in Berkshire if you can't afford a single share?

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 1:01 PM, moneyman35 wrote:

    @shotky my point exactly!

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Shtoky wrote:

    @moneyman35 When did you make any point and what does that mean? What was your point?

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 1:06 PM, TMFHousel wrote:

    @shtoky, moneyman,

    The class-b shares trade for $72. ticker is brk-b.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 2:09 PM, mikecart1 wrote:

    The above comments make no sense other than TMFHousel. It sounds like a lot of people are still stuck in using the wrong theory of what a cheap stock is. They only look at the stock price and not anything else. BRK-B could be very cheap at $70/share. In a few years, maybe $150 or $200 is the norm for that stock. Then people will be wondering why they didn't buy now like they do about not buying AAPL at $80 just a couple of years ago.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 3:11 PM, robert90069 wrote:

    Don't even geniuses have bad years, or bad decades? Didn't APPL have a bad decade or so before this one?

    BRKB is rated "very bearish" by Fidelity's mix of analysts, has significantly underperformed even the S&P index for the past year, and doesn't even pay dividends. I don't get it.

  • Report this Comment On October 07, 2011, at 4:58 PM, karlm1 wrote:

    robert90069 you are too short sighted. Yes from time to time the S&P will out perform Berkshire but on any 5 year average Berkshire has smoked the S&P. As far as dividends Buffett has already proved that he can invest the money earned better than most. The evidence is in the double digit beating he has given the S&P. It will be a sad day when Berkshire starts paying a dividend. That would mean he is having trouble out performing the S&P on a 5 year rolling average. I don't expect this to happen even long after Warren is gone. BRK has never had a bad decade compared to the broad market.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 9:07 AM, OBXRon wrote:

    I understand that Buffet has been a very good investor and maybe still is. Book value increases are nice but please explain how that helps me? I have owned BRK-B for about 3 years and have neither received a dividend nor had any appreciation on share value. In fact I have lost a couple of thousand since purchase............so how exactly does book value help me if I had to sell shares tomorrow?

    Thinking of selling and buying a good low cost ETF.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1565699, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 3:48:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 18 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
BRK-B $79.25 Down -0.55 -0.69%
Berkshire Hathaway CAPS Rating: *****
BRK-A $119500.00 Down -717.00 -0.60%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: ****
ORCL $26.14 Up +0.02 +0.08%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
WFC $31.86 Up +0.05 +0.16%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
MTB $81.82 Up +0.57 +0.70%
M&T Bank Corp CAPS Rating: ***
^GSPC $1317.82 Down -2.86 -0.22%
S&P 500 INDEX CAPS Rating: No stars
MSFT $29.06 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement