This Just In: More Upgrades and Downgrades

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." The pinstripe-and-wingtip crowd is entitled to its opinions, but we have some pretty sharp stock pickers down here on Main Street, too. And we're not always impressed with how Wall Street does its job.

So perhaps we shouldn't be giving virtual ink to "news" of analyst upgrades and downgrades. And we wouldn't -- if that were all we were doing. Fortunately, in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

Goldman Sachs: Serial party-pooper
Here we go again. Two months ago, electric car-battery maker A123 Systems (NYSE: AONE  ) was riding high on a wave of good news. General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) had confirmed that it was contracting with the company to build "thousands or tens of thousands of battery packs" for a new electric car to be named later. A123 shares surged 45% in a single day.

But just as A123 seemed to be picking up momentum, Goldman Sachs dropped a brick wall in its path. The shares were overvalued, Goldman said. There was no "catalyst" to "drive the stock" up farther. Given the "limited clarity on the range of profitability and ongoing macro uncertainty," Goldman advised investors to stop buying. Assigning a new $5 price target to A123, within just a few cents of the then-current price, Goldman effectively put the stock in "park."

Second verse, worse than the first
Since then, A123 shares have bounced around a bit, never exceeding Goldman's price target -- but not for lack of trying. Last week, the shares leapt 18% in a day when GM agreed to name names and provide details on its contract with A123.

Specifically, GM advised that the car it wanted to build would be called the Chevrolet Spark and would be an all-electric subcompact designed for city driving. Now, you might think the added clarity would appeal to Goldman, and maybe encourage the analyst to re-up its "buy" rating on A123. Instead, the opposite happened. Far from praising the Spark development, Goldman sees it as increasing the risks to A123 shares. The analyst not only downgraded the stock to "sell," but it also cut its target price in half, to just $2.50 per share.

Strange as that sounds ... I'm afraid Goldman is right.

Warning: This Spark may burn you
Why do I say this? Why does Goldman Sachs? I'll tell you why. The first big problem is cash: Cash that A123 must find to fulfill its obligation to provide batteries to GM. Cash it currently lacks. According to Goldman, ramping up battery production for the Spark's 2013 introduction will necessitate raising a lot of cash over the next 12 to 15 months -- more than the $295 million or so cash A123 currently has on hand.

Problem is, as a perennial cash burner, A123 can't really self-finance the production ramp. It's going to have to either increase its debt load (which now stands at $175 million) or, more likely, issue new shares. And if the latter, then A123's tiny $3.30 share price may force it to issue a lot of new shares to raise the needed cash, causing significant stock dilution. So much dilution won't be good news for the share price after the capital-raise. It won't be good news for shareholders.

And that's the good news. The bad news is that while A123 probably has no choice but to raise the cash to expand production and meet its obligations to GM, it may not help A123 at all. Remember: While it's an all-electric car, Chevy Spark isn't really a rival to Nissan's Leaf or Ford's (NYSE: F  ) electric Focus, much less to Tesla's (Nasdaq: TSLA  ) upcoming Model S. It's expected to have a driving range close to or inferior to that of the Leaf and Focus, and far below the base Model S's 160-mile range. The Spark will be even more limited in comparison with the ranges available with hybrid electric vehicles from Honda (NYSE: HMC  ) and Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) .

Foolish takeaway
Based on its limited range and tiny size, the Spark looks to be a dedicated city-commuter car, akin to the abject failure that was the Th!nk City -- the car that broke A123 rival Ener1. This suggests that GM -- and A123 -- may be overly optimistic if they expect to make 15,000 Spark sales in 2013. To the contrary, Spark may be hard-pressed to reach even the more modest success that GM's Volt and Nissan's Leaf have enjoyed.

If that's the way things play out, A123's expensive investments in expanding production may be all for naught. Given the risks, I think Goldman's right to advise selling the stock.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own (or short) shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 324 out of more than 180,000 members.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of General Motors and Ford.

We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 19, 2011, at 5:51 PM, belseware wrote:

    Sounds like A123 needs a Federal Govt Loan Guarantee...then they can go bankrupt without hurting the bank accounts of any executives.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2011, at 12:28 AM, dstubbs1967 wrote:

    Isn't this the same Goldman Sachs that went bankrupt? I guess they learned SO much from their mistakes that they are qualified to make these calls. Or maybe they are so invested in oil that they are afraid of a company like A123 actually making a product that helps save America from its reliance on foreign oil. Hmmmm.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2011, at 11:02 AM, roge0063 wrote:

    The assumptions in the article are simply based on continuation of a weak economy and declining oil prices. This is not the case. The recent data shows jobless claims are on the decline and the economy is showing some signs of life. As the economy revives, oil prices will work its way towards the $100 mark. Then the people are going to take a closer look at the electric cars. We all have to agree that it is somewhat embarrassing we are still using an internal combustion technology that was invented in the late 1700’s. We are simply stuck with it. Does it make sense to continue to polluting our environment while making countries hostile to us richer and putting our national security at risk? This is the future of our children and their children. Let’s save our lovely planet for them.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2011, at 12:25 PM, TurbulentTime wrote:

    Goldman's call aside, Rich Smith is right that Spark really cannot compare in terms of 1, range, 2, brand name since it is GM. Then, there is oil price risk. The world actually is kind of still pretty much in recession mode in all Main Streets, so just because there is sometimes some signs of life for our economy doesn't mean that commodities pries can't go down more before going back up. If one wants to save the Earth and Mother Nature, one actually should just use bicycles. That also enhance our body strength and health besides taking care of Mother Nature. Since there are increased risks without expected higher return, I am out. No A123 for me.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2011, at 5:53 PM, TMFDitty wrote:

    Furthermore, I'm not even willing to concede that the economy *is* showing "some signs of life." To the contrary, if you look at the recent trends in transport volume, I'd say the economy is fading fast:

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/10/18/trucking-to...

    TMFDitty

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2011, at 6:12 PM, sdturbo wrote:

    I thought it was only the Goldman analysts were

    stupid, idiate and foolish who cut the branch of a

    tree which is giving them shade and fruits i.e. GM.

    They robbed so much money from AIG, Auto companies, mortgages and made fraud in stocks

    and now they have no respect. Why don't they keep their dirty nose out of others affairs. They are losing money and trying to tell others how to manage it. Very sad.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1572982, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 1:54:06 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement