Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

50

Facts and Stats That Blew My Mind

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

"The devil is in the details," they say. But I think that famous expression could just as easily be, "The devil is in the numbers." Numbers matter for investors, so it's incredibly important to understand what they mean.

I spend my days reading and analyzing stocks, so I stumble across fascinating numbers all the time. As part of my investing process, I always try to seek out the larger implications behind these figures. Many times they might indicate potential growth, or reveal the nuances of a revenue stream. Obviously, the numbers aren't everything -- qualitative factors are equally important when making an investing decision. I strongly believe, however, that meaningful figures are a key part of a successful investing process, so I'll be sharing with you some of the stats and facts I've stumbled across that made me do a double take.

Water, malt, hops, yeast... and rice?
If you had to guess which company bought 10% of the total domestic rice supply each year, what would you say? Maybe someone in the food services industry like Chinese food purveyor P.F. Chang's or perhaps private-label manufacturer Ralcorp? While they'd be good guesses, they lose out to a company with a surprising rice appetite: Anheuser-Busch InBev (NYSE: BUD  ) .

That's right -- the world's largest brewer is also the country's largest rice purchaser, gobbling up one out of every 10 grains of rice grown in the U.S. annually. The crop is a key ingredient in Anheuser's signature Budweiser brand, one of the few beers brewed this way. While the merits of rice-based beer are debated, the impact on Anheuser-Busch is more clear. With rice comprising 30% of the ingredients, the brand has a different commodity structure than competitors like Boston Beer (NYSE: SAM  ) .

This can help or hinder Anheuser-Busch. For instance, if rice prices rise faster than competitor's inputs, Budweiser will have to raise its prices comparatively more and risk losing some of its 51% domestic market share; vice versa if rice remains comparatively cheap. Budweiser is still just one of AB's brands, but it is its biggest, so investors should keep an eye on rice prices if they're considering an investment here.

King Kong has nothing on Wal-Mart
When it comes to massive companies, retail juggernaut Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT  ) sets the bar. This company is so big that its decision to add choice beef to its stores pushed the wholesale price of the product to an eight-year high after it purchased so much.

This company is full of mind-boggling stats like that, but here are a few of my favorites:

  • Wal-Mart's computer system is the world's largest, surpassing even the Pentagon's.
  • Wal-Mart owns the world's largest fleet of trucks.
  • The company is the second-largest employer in the United States, behind only the government.

So what good is that computer system? Well, just one task it performs is monitoring weather patterns. If it detects a hurricane or extreme weather approaching, it'll automatically order more strawberry Pop-Tarts from Kellogg -- a disaster zone favorite-- and get them on trucks in time to hit stores in soon-to-be devastated areas. That's some serious processing power.

The point here is that while many regard Wal-Mart as a boring investment, its economic moat is so wide that you can barely see across it. It has the scope, resources, and supply chain to outmaneuver and out-operate virtually any competitor. I would not bet against it.

Ke$ha > The Beatles?
It's true. Ke$ha's debut single "Tik Tok" has sold more copies than any Beatles single. Once I picked my jaw up off the floor and got over the horrible cultural implications here, I realized the powerful forces and investing opportunities fueling this performance.

While few would argue Ke$ha is the superior artist, none can debate the superiority of modern music distribution compared to when The Beatles were recording. The digital revolution has taken music from a physical record, cassette, or CD, and made it available as digital content. Back in 2008, Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) surpassed Wal-Mart as the No. 1 music retailer in the U.S. In 2009, Apple became the largest music retailer worldwide. Now it accounts for 70% of all music sales.

Apple's iTunes does away with the traditional understanding of supply chains, inventory, and manufacturing. It is able to put more content in the hands of more people faster than ever before. iTunes is slated to bring in $13 billion in revenue in 2013, which will only add to Apple's mountain of cash.

While it is depressing that "Tik Tok" sold more than any Beatles single, Ke$ha had the upper hand in terms of distribution, not to mention a larger and more connected population to sell to. Through iTunes, Ke$ha was able to sell over 600,000 copies of one song in just seven days. While the real money driver of Apple has become its iPhone, the fact that iTunes is still growing at 29% a year makes it another valuable revenue stream. The program also acts as a complement to the company's other devices, increasing its appeal. With its massive cash balance, dominant media position, and continued growth, Apple is still poised to reward shareholders for years to come.

Here today, bigger tomorrow
These three companies are all the biggest players in their respective spaces, so it may be tough to get excited about them. While it's true that many of the biggest companies quickly become household names and have most expectations reflected in their stock price, we are at the very beginning of what Fool technology analyst Eric Bleeker has dubbed "the next trillion-dollar revolution." As we move further down the road of mobile device penetration, there is one unexpected company poised to become the juggernaut of tomorrow. The Motley Fool has profiled this company in a special FREE report. You can click here to access it now -- it won't cost a dime.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

Austin Smith owns no shares of the companies mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Wal-Mart Stores, Boston Beer, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Wal-Mart Stores, Kellogg, Boston Beer, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have also recommended creating a bull call spread position in Apple and a diagonal call position in Wal-Mart Stores. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (9) | Recommend This Article (50)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2011, at 6:33 PM, JohnLeven wrote:

    Fact: rice is a terrible substitute for barley. People are realizing (and have been for years) that a $30 case of craft beer made with real barley and tons of hops is preferable to a $20 case of any Anheuser-Busch, or MillerCoors product made from corn & rice and almost no hops.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2011, at 7:40 PM, TMFDRadovsky wrote:

    Well, I guess that takes the mystery out of why Samuel Adams and most other beers are better than Budweiser.

    Dan

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Chemsoldier88 wrote:

    This is why I subscribe to this site. You guys do your homework. Exellent article.

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2011, at 2:17 AM, Chemsoldier88 wrote:

    Excellent * :D

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Hawmps wrote:

    <<On December 19, 2011, at 7:40 PM, TMFDRadovsky wrote:

    Well, I guess that takes the mystery out of why Samuel Adams and most other beers are better than Budweiser.

    Dan>>

    I can't agree more... but still, more empty bottles of BUD get recycled every year than any other. How can that be??? Oh, the humanity!!

  • Report this Comment On December 21, 2011, at 2:51 AM, hbofbyu wrote:

    Those stats didn't blow my mind. Once again the content fails to live up to the headline.

  • Report this Comment On December 21, 2011, at 3:26 AM, dividendgrowth wrote:

    Wow! Truly mind-boggling facts.

    Well done!

  • Report this Comment On December 21, 2011, at 5:19 PM, idanp wrote:

    nice article. thanks!

  • Report this Comment On December 23, 2011, at 8:11 PM, TempoAllegro wrote:

    I did enjoy the article, especially the stuff about Wal-mart having more computers (however that word is defined) than the Pentagon.

    My comment is about Ke$ha selling more that the Beatles. While that may be true in absolue terms, I think we are comparing apples (no pun intended) to oranges.

    First, imagine the world population at the time the Beatles were selling their songs. It was much smaller than today's population. Furthermore, of the entire world population, only a smaller portion was "hooked up" to the music distribution system - I'd say North America and Western Europe. So among that very much smaller population they STILL managed to sell their 600,000 tunes compared with Ke$ha's arguably worldwide reach today.

    Second, the cost of the tunes back then was much greater. The dollar was worth more, and the tunes themselves as a portion of the person's income was higher. If someone smarter than me were to figure it out, I would be we'd end up with a Ke$ha tune costing about $5 per pop or something extreme. Would our buyers of today be such devoted followers of Ke$ha as to fork out the same relative amount of cash as the Beatles fans of the past? I doubt it.

    One last point. Numbers are fun, as are articles like this. But they can be manipulated to mean just about anything one wants. It's good to ask questions about sources, how things are being compared, and how many studies (and what type) were being used, and if they had any biases. A good little book that helped me was "How to Lie with Statistics." Might be a good time to read it again over the holidays!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1744680, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/19/2013 9:42:32 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,354.40 121.18 0.80%
S&P 500 1,667.47 17.00 1.03%
NASD 3,498.97 33.73 0.97%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/17/2013 4:00 PM
WMT $77.87 Down -0.63 -0.80%
Wal-Mart Stores CAPS Rating: ****
BUD $96.37 Down -0.35 -0.36%
Anheuser-Busch InB… CAPS Rating: ****
SAM $155.26 Up +1.47 +0.96%
Boston Beer CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $433.26 Down -1.32 -0.30%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement