What Apple Needs in 2012: Value Investors and a Dividend

There's very little I can say about Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) that hasn't already been said. The company has been growing earnings like gangbusters, yet its stock isn't being respected the way many think it should.

After reading a report by Sanford Bernstein research analyst Toni Sacconaghi, I think we might have a good idea what it could take to make Apple the first trillion-dollar company: a dividend.

Pedaling faster and faster, getting nowhere
To truly appreciate the growth Apple has produced, and to understand how severe the P/E compression recently has been, we could simply look at the numbers.

3-Year Revenue Growth Rate  50%
3-Year Earnings Growth Rate  72%
P/E (ttm)  13.9
Forward P/E  9.9
PEG Ratio  0.6

Sources: Yahoo! Finance, fool.com.

And although savvy investors will be left scratching their heads when they see these figures, nothing may capture the unique situation quite like this graph.

Apple Stock Chart

Apple Stock Chart by YCharts

It is a rare, rare case where you can find a company whose valuation multiple has contracted by 40% yet the price has almost doubled. Along the way, the company's iPhone has put Research In Motion's (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) BlackBerry in danger of losing the business-smartphone market, and its Macs have been taking more and more market share from the likes of Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) .

Moving forward, Apple is firmly entrenched as a member of the triumvirate leading the technology sector forward -- with Google and Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) assuming the two other spots.

The problem: institutional value investors
In his note to investors, Sacconaghi explores the role that institutional investors are playing in the depression of Apple's stock. Surveying 725 large-cap U.S. mutual funds, he finds that Apple is 26% overweighed by growth funds. Because there are self-imposed limits to how much of a stock funds can own, that doesn't leave a whole lot of investors to create demand for Apple.

Sacconaghi argues that the answer lies in value funds, which are actually significantly underweighted in Apple's stock. That doesn't necessarily make sense to Sacconaghi, given the company's fortress-like balance sheet.

If value funds were to snap out of their funk and start buying shares, that could provide some serious tailwinds for Apple. And the catalyst: joining the likes of Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) and Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) as tech stalwarts that offer their investors the benefit of a hefty dividend.

The power of a dividend
How hefty of a dividend could Apple offer? Here's Sacconaghi's take: "If Apple were to retain that cash balance but return 50% of free cash flow to investors, it would allow the company to pay a 5% annual dividend and still grow its cash reserves by $20 billion per year. A 5% dividend would represent the single-highest yield among the 25 largest U.S. technology companies."

If we were to play a little hypothetical game here, we could see the effect such a move could have on Apple's price. Right now, investors put Intel and Microsoft's yields at 3.6% and 3.1%, respectively; let's say this means investors are willing to accept a 3.4% dividend yield from a tech behemoth.

Obviously, Apple is a fundamentally different company from Intel or Microsoft,but if we were to assume that Apple's payout would be what Sacconaghi is assuming (about a $19-per-share dividend), and that the market would make the yield come in at 3.4%, then we're looking at a share price of about $560. That's an almost 50% premium to where it currently stands.

Is this a guarantee? Surely not, but a dividend would make sense, and new CEO Tim Cook looks more willing to take that route than Steve Jobs ever did.

Get in before a pop?
Dividend or not, Apple is a solid investment, and I think it deserves a place in any well-diversified portfolio. It represents roughly 7% of my real-life portfolio, and I've had it green-thumbed on my Motley Fool CAPS profile for a while now,too.

If you're interested in profiting from the mobile revolution that the likes of Apple, Amazon and Google are participating in, I highly suggest you check out latest special free report: "3 Hidden Winners of The iPhone, iPad, and Android Revolution." We all know who the obvious companies in this revolution are, but if we can zero in on the hidden winners, we can snatch up shares of three companies that are underappreciated by the market right now. Get the names of those three companies in your report today; it's absolutely free!

Fool contributor Brian Stoffel owns shares of Apple, Google, Amazon and Intel. You can follow him on Twitter at @TMFStoffel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft, Google, Apple, Intel, and Amazon.com and has bought calls on Intel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Google, Intel, Microsoft, Amazon.com, and Apple and creating bull call spread positions in Apple, Microsoft, and Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2011, at 10:41 PM, mardams wrote:

    If Apple pays dividends it may lessen the price of shares since Apple has a numerous pile of unsettled dividends. The worth of money the company has turned to a major part of what Apple is on stock market.

    It will be only small portion of the money if Apple will begin paying dividends next year.But why to worry with such small values at all? What will be the point if shareholders would get $3 per share that costs nearly $350?

    So it will the best approach that Apple will still not pay dividends next year.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2011, at 11:26 PM, mardams wrote:

    Still, I'll be tracking down the <a href="http://alpha.forcastix.com/Apple-Inc-AAPL/overview ">apple revenue</a> next year for some changes they will make. Thanks a lot and more power.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1745287, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2014 8:21:58 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement