Recs

12

1 Small Cap on My Radar

For a few years now, oil has traded at a hefty premium to natural gas prices in the United States. Because of this divergence, many oil and gas companies have refocused their operations to focus on higher-return oil projects. This is a multiyear trend in the making, so I'm always on the lookout for companies that might benefit from the shift. One small cap that has been focusing on liquids is Abraxas Petroleum (Nasdaq: AXAS  ) .

Company snapshot

Market Cap $315 million
Net Debt $104 million
TTM OCF $33 million
TTM Capex $69 million
Price-to-OCF Ratio 9.6
Proved Reserves at Year End 2010 26.6 million BOE
Recent Price $3.36

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

One thing that jumps out at me is that the company's trading at almost 10 times operating cash flow, much higher than established players such as Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN  ) , Denbury Resources (NYSE: DNR  ) , and Whiting Petroleum (NYSE: WLL  ) , which can all be purchased for multiples of just 5 and 6. Moreover, $104 million is a fair amount of debt compared with its market cap of $315 million.

The debt and valuation numbers don't exactly pop off the screen, but smaller companies shouldn't be judged solely on recent performance, since they're usually in the process of ramping up. Every well that comes online usually provides a noticeable bump in production and has a greater impact on overall production growth, so we need to examine its portfolio of assets and see where the company might go in the future.

Taking a closer look
Abraxas has acreage in the Alberta Bakken, Bakken / Three Forks, Niobrara, Eagle Ford Shale, Permian, and Barnett shale plays. Among the more important assets are 50,000-plus net acres in the Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Niobrara, emerging sources of unconventional oil. In the Bakken and Niobrara alone, the company will spend roughly half of its projected $60 million capital budget for 2011.

Ever since natural gas prices decided not to rebound with other commodities, companies have been skewing their capital spending toward liquids plays. Abraxas will be increasing its capital spending in 2012 to $70 million, a 17% increase over the projected 2011 budget. All of that spending will be targeting oil and natural gas liquids.

As of the end of 2010, Abraxas hedged 66% to 82% of both its oil and gas production going out to 2013. The oil hedges are out of the money, with prices averaging $75.69. The gas hedges, however, are very attractive, with an average price of $6.69. As the company spends heavily on oil and liquids, further oil hedging should slowly bump the average up.

Looking forward
One thing that's attractive about Abraxas is that most of its acreage is held by production. That means the company's not forced to drill just to hold on to acreage, but it can allocate capital to its highest-return projects. That's a big positive, since the company prides itself in having a diverse portfolio of emerging unconventional oil plays in the Bakken, Eagle Ford, and Niobrara shales.

The company has yet to announce exactly where the capital-spending budget will be allocated, but one can be certain that a large portion of it will go to the Bakken. Of the 2011 budget, 43% was allocated to the area in 2011, and the company even purchased a drilling rig to ensure its ability to maintain drilling in the area given the high demand for oilfield services.

It's interesting to see a smaller player moving to become vertically integrated, but the economics appear to make sense. The company expects its three-year well costs to come down $13 million, compared with the cost of contracting out for a rig instead. As long as the company can keep the rig utilized at a high rate, it's hard to argue with the move.

Foolish bottom line
Abraxas is not exactly the cheapest at almost 10 times operating cash flow, but it's making the right moves to accelerate development in key liquids-rich areas. If the company can continue its current course, it should start to reap the benefits of its new oily focus.

Looking for more ideas? The Motley Fool has created a new special oil report titled "3 Stocks for $100 Oil," which you can download today, absolutely free. In this report, Fool analysts cover three outstanding oil companies, including the stock Fool analyst David Lee Smith calls the "energy king." Get instant access to the names of the three oil stocks -- for free.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Paul Chi is an analyst on the Fool's Alpha and Duke Street services. You can follow him on Twitter to stay up to date on his latest market commentary. Paul and Matt Argersinger co-manage the Street Fighter portfolio, where they look for cheap, unloved stocks with home run potential. The Motley Fool owns shares of Denbury Resources and Devon Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 9:55 AM, birge1 wrote:

    sadly, the plight of Abraxas is the same as most small cos--it was nearly bnkrupt 2 yrs ago because mgmt refuses to pay down debt and live within cash flow. (sounds like d.c. too) prdctn and reserve increases are the new gods of the mrkt; cos have forgotten about "making profits."

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    I agree Paul. It is my largest position.

    birge1- I don't know where you came up with " it was nearly bnkrupt 2 yrs ago because mgmt refuses to pay down debt and live within cash flow", but I strongly disagree with your assessment of AXAS.

    I have been folowing them for a very long time, and while I won't go into a complete history, which is longer than most people think, here is a short history that I posted on the previous blog.

    Until 2009, they were simply the general partner in Abraxis Partnership, holding about 48%.

    They had no debt.

    When Lehman helped cause the global economy to get "flushed down the toilet", the IPO which was about to take place, went away.

    So in 2009, they had to go another route. They consolidated the partnership into AXAS, took on debt, and basically started from there.

    They implemented their strategy of selling off non core assests, entered into a joint venture, and started to drill in earnest.

    To get the funds needed to take this forward, they issued a lot of new shares. They used a portion of this to pay down debt, and the rest to "gear up" their operation.

    When you basically start from "scratch", it takes time to get to profitability, so no, they don't have a long history of being profitable, but they are moving in the right direction and will get there sooner than a lot of people think.

    They must be doing something right, since they have both a large insider and institutional ownership in their stock.

    Using their credit line, and cash from the joint venture, they established a CAPEX of $60M for 2011, and announced a CAPEX of $70M for 2012.

    They sensibly used derivatives to cover themselves against wild fluctuations in the markert for both their OIL and their GAS production for 2011, 2012, and 2013.

    Having such derivitives in place is good for protection, but limits them somewhat in earnings.

    They have steadily increased production to the level that they anticipate ending the year at between 4,700 and 4,900 barrels equivalent per day, which at their average "swap" of $75 per barrel, would give them revenue of between $128M and $134M per year, and that is before you include any new production.

    While they are moving toward a 50/50 ratio of Oil to Gas, they also have very good "swaps" on their gas production.

    They are operating in a variety of locations with different types and costs required for production.

    I happen to believe the future is very bright for them, but anything can happen.

    The EPA could "outlaw" fracking tomorrow, which would cause them, and most other O & G companies a lot of problems, but they do have plays that don't require fracking.

    If you don't feel comfortable with investing in them, then don't.

    I happen to think that in their case, the reward far outweighs the risk.

    JMO and worth exactly what I am charging for it.

    Add your comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 4:26 PM, TMFBabo wrote:

    @birge1: I agree AXAS has quite a lot of debt, but I think it's unfair to ding every small E&P about their self-funding status. They're generally not self-funded because they've yet to achieve scale. You need a large foundation of PDP wells on which to build before you can lay off the aggressive capex.

    Once the little guys switch from exploration to infill drilling after de-risking their acreage, I think we generally see production growth start to come in line more with capex growth (though I agree there are many that never get there without major bumps such as tons of debt and/or dilution).

    @Teacherman1: I thought you might comment. I remember glancing at AXAS after you mentioned your amazing cost basis on a CAPS blog and I remember we discussed the amazing gas hedges at almost $7.

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 4:35 PM, EnigmaDude wrote:

    ... or they could just do what Ram Energy did and find a new CEO who is willing to put up a $500M investment!

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 6:42 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    TMFBabo- While my cost basis is still good, it is not as good as it was. I decided to get a lot more, so my cost basis is now up to $2.60 instead of the $1.90 it was at, but even now it is about equal to "proven reserves", which I think is a good place to be in this kind of business.

    I should have done it back in early October, when for a brief period of time, it actually got lower than my $1.90 price.

    I look forward to following the STREET FIGHTER portfolio for good ideas to "borrow/steal". :)

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2011, at 7:16 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    EnigmaDude- Thanks for the "heads up" on RAM. I have added it to my watchlist.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1749194, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 5:17:40 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
DVN $60.02 Down -0.41 -0.68%
Devon Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****
WLL $44.68 Up +0.41 +0.93%
Whiting Petroleum… CAPS Rating: ****
AXAS $2.56 Down -0.07 -2.66%
Abraxas Petroleum… CAPS Rating: ****
DNR $15.56 Up +0.35 +2.30%
Denbury Resources,… CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement