Recs

6

Apple's Ready to Disrupt Again

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

You're getting tired of hearing about Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) rumored TV.

Is it coming? When is it coming? Will it be too expensive? Will the sets be too small?

However, there's a little nugget so meaty that it may disrupt the television industry as we know it.

Sterne Agee analyst Shawn Wu notes that Apple is trying to roll out an Internet-based television service where viewers can cherry-pick the channels or shows that they want to watch for a monthly subscription fee.

There seems to be little chance that the cable networks will play along. CBS (NYSE: CBS  ) admitted last month that Apple had approached the media giant, offering a revenue-sharing arrangement in a streaming TV service. CBS passed, arguing that it prefers to license its content.

Apple is probably running into that same kind of resistance elsewhere.

Cable networks are a racket. This week, Time Warner Cable (NYSE: TWC  ) and Madison Square Garden (Nasdaq: MSG  ) are battling it out over renewals. Time Warner Cable wants to secure rights to MSG to make sure its subscribers get their steady diet of Knicks and Rangers games. MSG is asking for a healthy rate increase, but also demanding that Time Warner Cable continue to carry Madison Square Garden's lightly viewed Fuse music channel as a package.

Isn't this what's wrong with television these days? Couch potatoes are stuck paying for channels that they never watch.

Is there really a home out there that watches MSNBC and Fox News? Even if there is that one bipartisan home, don't you think even that family would want to pay less and get just one -- or none at all?

Why is ESPN -- which media tracker SNL Kagan claims sets distributors back a whopping $4.69 a month per home -- part of most cable packages? I have no problem paying that, but I doubt my parents would feel the same way. MTV may seem to be a relative bargain at $0.37 per home, but is anyone still watching the original music channel beyond Jersey Shore buffs?

This is where Apple steps in. The challenge seems daunting, but folks didn't give Apple much of a chance when it revolutionized the music industry with 2003's iTunes Music Store launch. If Apple can find a way to let couch potatoes actually pay only for the stuff that they're watching -- potentially shaving down their TV bills -- suddenly paying a premium for a smart television isn't so outlandish after all.

Apple's been a big winner over the years, and there's a new report detailing three hidden winners riding the coattails of Apple's success. It's a free report, but only for a limited time, so check it out now.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Madison Square Garden. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of and creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz calls them as he sees them. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2011, at 11:15 AM, JohnatDuke wrote:

    Not sure they could pull it off, but I would be willing to go this route. I watch maybe 20-30 of the 150-200 stations I pay for with TWC. I want ESPN and DIS and am willing to pay for those, but why do I have to get 25 Spanish channels, MTV, VH1 (and their derivatives), and 50-75 other specialty channels too. I don't care or listen to the all music stations (which are numbered between my regular stations and my HD stations).

    I would much rather have an a la cart selection. Hell, I might even pay a higher rate per channel just not to have to waste my life flipping past crap, or memorizing TV stations. And for those times my Mom comes to visit, I could add in a few extras for a monthly fee. Hell if I could get CBS, TBS, FOX and all the Disney-owned stations (ABC, ABC Family, ESPN, DIS) and some of the NBC owned stations - I would be good to go.

    Since I now sound like my Dad -- you kids get off my lawn!!!!

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2011, at 11:16 AM, daveshouston wrote:

    Once again, Apple looks at a market from the point of view of what's best for the consumer.

    No one does that at Comcast, Time Warner, CBS, ABC, CNN, ESPN, NFL, NBA, etc.

    Neither did the folks at RIM, Microsoft, Nokia, Verizon, or AT&T (prior to the iPhone and iPad, or the music publishing companies.

    Consumers didn't want to buy CDs, which might contain only one or two good songs. They wanted to buy singles and at a good price ($1).

    Television pricing should be like taxi cabs. The going rate should be about 30 cents per hour. If you watch a 3 hour NFL game it should cost you 90 cents. Watch a one hour Law & Order or a cooking show on the food channel and pay 30 cents. No more $5 pay per view movies, just 30 cents per hour. If you don't watch it then you should pay zero.

    Comcast and Time Warner should be providing internet connectivity period (a dump pipe).

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2011, at 11:34 AM, 1984macman wrote:

    The only way you can pay only for what you watch is to have someone keeping score. Whether its Apple or Google or Amazon or Microsoft or whomever, someone is going to have to be trusted to know your viewing habits.

    Personally, I choose Apple. Of all the companies I can think of, they care the most about their customer. It may, be a "walled garden", but it's a lot safer than what others have to offer.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2011, at 11:57 AM, rfaramir wrote:

    Apple is TRYING to look at things from the customer's point of view, but as the article said, "Cable networks are a racket."

    Whatever your political persuasion, more liberty will make things better.

    Local monopolies to cable companies give them the power to screw us over. Preventing competition prevents them from having to pay attention to consumer wants.

    "Television pricing should be like taxi cabs." No, please no! Maybe you mean like how taxi cabs SHOULD be, not how they really are. They operate in a highly monopolized fashion through government licensing of 'medallions'. More freedom in this market would allow competitors to innovate in different ways to serve taxi customers, driving up service levels and driving down costs.

    Similarly, Apple is trying to compete with the established cable monopolies (and the content oligarchs). I don't know if they will be successful (I hope they are, as I am long AAPL), but we can applaud the attempt to serve us in the manner in which we wish--and are willing to pay--to be served.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Hawmps wrote:

    Perhaps this is part of the hold on to the hord of cash strategy... going toe to toe with cablevision will not be cheap.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1749947, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 5:32:41 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
TWC $76.42 Down -0.48 -0.62%
Time Warner Cable,… CAPS Rating: ***
MSG $36.85 Down -0.49 -1.31%
Madison Square Gar… CAPS Rating: ***
CBS $31.56 Down -0.07 -0.22%
CBS Corp CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement