Recs

5

Sirius XM Is Better Than Morgan Stanley Thinks

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Morgan Stanley's downgrade of Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) this morning may not seem like too much of a diss.

Analyst Benjamin Swinburne is slashing his rating on the satellite radio giant from overweight to equal weight, while at the same time raising his price target from $2 to $2.30.

The past few weeks of healthy capital appreciation will work wonders in getting even skeptical analysts to bump up their price targets. There's even one pro -- Barrington Research's James Goss -- who elevated his 2012 price target to $3 earlier this month.

So what exactly is eating Swinburne? Well, he's fond of Sirius XM's business model and its growth outlook, but he finds himself on the low end when it comes to subscriber growth. Swinburne is looking for just 1.3 million net additions this year, a far cry from the 1.7 million net additions that got the service up to 21.9 million subscribers through 2011. Most analysts are eyeing 1.5 million or more.

Swinburne concedes that Sirius XM did come through with better-than-expected subscriber growth during the fourth quarter. He also singles out the improving sales outlook at General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) and Ford (NYSE: F  ) .

That's important. Ford and GM were early partners in the Sirius XM story. Since factory-installed receivers account for the vast majority of satellite radio subscribers, strength at Ford and GM has historically resulted in strong account growth at Sirius XM.

This doesn't mean Swinburne's caution is unwarranted. Sirius XM raised its rates this month. The increase wasn't much, but the 12% hike for new subscribers -- and old subscribers as they approach renewal milestones -- will weed out some penny-pinchers.

Sirius XM's own guidance should also raise some eyebrows. The media giant hasn't gone public with its 2012 subscriber target, but back in September Sirius XM was projecting $3.3 billion in revenue for 2012. That's a mere 10% increase over its 2011 top-line target and closer to a 5% spurt based on its fourth-quarter run rate (which matters because the 12% price hike went into effect at the start of this year). Obviously, there will be a lot of people who won't be hit or can negotiate their way out of this month's increase. Until Sirius XM puts out a public subscriber target -- something that may happen when it reports early next month -- Swinburne and his peers will simply have to agree to disagree.

I don't question Swinburne's skepticism on subscriber growth for 2012. Conversion rates have been shrinking in recent quarters, and new cars will be less of a factor with every passing year as more buyers are either existing subscribers swapping one sub for another or folks who tried the service and chose to pass on paying a premium for an upgrade in in-car audio entertainment.

However, Sirius XM doesn't need to grow its subscribers at a heady clip to deliver strong bottom-line results. Between this month's price hike and the fact that programming and content costs have actually declined over the past year, even a modest gain in subscribers will be huge in terms of profitability and free cash flow.

Sirius XM's fundamentals continue to improve. The share price will follow.

In the spirit of the CAPScall initiative for accountability, I'm reiterating my bullish call on Sirius XM for Motley Fool CAPS. XM Satellite Radio was a Rule Breakers recommendation before the Sirius XM merger. It's gone from the scorecard, but if you want to discover the newsletter service's next Rule-Breaking multibagger, a free report tells all.  

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford Motor. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Ford Motor and General Motors. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a synthetic long position in Ford Motor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz calls them as he sees them. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 23, 2012, at 11:42 AM, CaribouPaku wrote:

    I just don't get it. Overweight to equal weight but than increase price from $2.00 to $2.20. This is exactly the kind of mixed messages that should not be allowed or warrented. Who sets this net subscribers growth projectin and who really cares if it is 1.3million or 1.7million. in either case this will be actual net increases in paying users not some mythical figure used like in Pandora where you only get to try it out unless you subscribe to it and than are used as a number in their subscribed pool, whcih is very misleading. The increase in revenue will go to the bottom line. What was his real motive? To drive the price down so as to capitalize on the downward tick? Hmm, something smells at Morgan Stanley....

  • Report this Comment On January 23, 2012, at 2:25 PM, doubting wrote:

    Rick,

    Great title. It is actually the best part of your post. You did chime in at the right time.

    However, your statement, "I don't question Swinburne's skepticism on subscriber growth for 2012. Conversion rates have been shrinking in recent quarters, and new cars will be less of a factor with every passing year as more buyers are either existing subscribers swapping one sub for another or folks who tried the service and chose to pass on paying a premium for an upgrade in in-car audio entertainment.", is a little bit disingenuous. And I hope you know why. If you do not know why, let me explain just in case.

    1. You know just as well as anyone following siri closely, that unlike before where siri relied virtually only on the OEM sales, there are two more sources of subs. One that is getting quite a bit of strength and will be a factor this decade is used car sales with installed sat radios. These sales are already getting significant, per Mel Karmazin, at about 35% take rate.

    2. Sat radio 2.0 technology featured today by Lynx combining both satellite and internet technology. It is true that we do not know the extent of its impact. But what we do know is that we are getting more channels targeting Hispanic community of over 50M in this country and we are getting closer to customization and personalization. Per Mel, the latter may happen as early as 2012.

    As to "conversion rates have been shrinking", this is an apparent stretch because they have been in the same ballpark in 2011.

    To summarize, let us be, as Fox guys tout themselves, FAIR and BALANCED. Although OEM market may not be as efficient as before but it will compensate by the growing OEM sales pace. I expect about the same number of new subs from OEM sales this year. But the other two sources that I described above will keep driving the subs numbers to about 2M in 2012. I Hope one day siri will provide a breakdown of its subs per source.

    As to Swinburne et al., they should be ashamed of themselves. They obviously suffer from mouth diarrhea by coming out with their wild guesswork literally on the eve of siri 2011 announcement and 2012 guidance that are expected within the next two or three weeks. We have been through this before, haven’t we? I just wonder how Swinburne and the likes would feel if Mel announces, say, 1.8M instead of Swinburne’s 1.3M guidance for 2012. Will they apologize or as usual pretend that nothing happened.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1763088, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 6:00:31 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
GM $22.44 Up +0.40 +1.81%
General Motors Com… CAPS Rating: **
F $10.60 Up +0.01 +0.09%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement