Recs

1

Throw This Stock Away

The house rules are simple in this weekly column.

I bash a stock that I think is heading lower. I offset the sting by recommending three stocks as portfolio replacements.

Who gets tossed out this week? Come on down, Target (NYSE: TGT  ) .

Ixnay on the Tar-jay
I have historically been bullish on the "cheap chic" discounter. It may not be the biggest or the cheapest discount department store, but it's the one that most people aren't embarrassed to be shopping at, for the most part.

No one ever posts "I'm going to Kmart" on Facebook. Target is a more socially acceptable shopping outlet.

However, a Wall Street Journal article earlier this week details the lengths that Target is going to in order to nip showrooming in the bud. What's showrooming? Well, it's what some retail analysts are calling the growing practice of shoppers armed with smartphones or access to comparison-shopping websites entering stores to check out goods before buying them for less online.

Target has been reaching out to its vendors, asking them to offer the chain specialized products that shoppers can only buy at the discounter. If a vendor can't provide exclusivity, Target's asking for pricing discounts so it can match the price points of online-only operators.

It's easy to see the flaw in Target's thinking. Why would vendors give Target a price cut? Why should suppliers bear the cost discrepancy between running a brick-and-mortar operation and the limited overhead of a streamlined e-tailer? Why would a vendor sacrifice margins in replacing the same sale?

Target will fare better in its cry for exclusivity or special editions of certain products, but never to the point where a vendor will forgo overall sales growth.

Showrooming is inevitable -- and it will only become a growing problem for Target and its physical-retailing peers.

Target's already feeling the pain. Analysts see flat earnings growth for this holiday quarter that concludes next week. Wall Street is bracing for profitability to climb by a mere 1% -- on a 4% top-line uptick -- for the new fiscal year that kicks in next month.

Sure, Target may seem cheap at 12 times earnings with a decent 2.4% yield, but where's the growth? As more consumers arm themselves with smartphones, showrooming will see lines at the register continue to thin out.

Target hosed down its quarterly guidance earlier this month. As a result of weaker-than-expected holiday sales in December, the discount department store operator now sees fiscal fourth-quarter earnings coming in between $1.35 a share and $1.43 a share. Its previous target was as high as $1.53 a share.

Things won't get any better with its anti-showrooming initiatives. Target will be forced either to slash margins by cutting prices or to forgo sales. Either way, the bottom line is going to take a hit, and even the 1% increase that analysts are targeting for the year ahead may prove to be too aggressive.

It was fun while it lasted, Tar-jay. I'm initiating a bearish CAPScall rating on Target this morning.

Good news
As I do every week, I don't talk down a stock unless I have three alternatives that I believe will outperform the company getting the heave-ho. Let's go over the three fill-ins.

  • Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) : We all know that Amazon, Target's former online partner, is eating its lunch. At least one of the initiatives that Target is proposing to vendors -- discounted pricing on subscriptions for repeat purchases -- is something that Amazon has been doing for years. However, there are some things that Target will never be able to do as efficiently as Amazon. The lean infrastructure that affords Amazon the opportunity to sell goods at meager markups will always make Target more expensive on similar goods. Amazon's ability to sacrifice margins because it's cashing in on the technological end through hosting and merchant services will never be matched by Target or anyone else. It's true that Amazon is a very expensive stock, and that it's going through its own margin contraction as it emphasizes Kindle sales. However, analysts see Amazon growing its revenue by 33% in 2012. It's the one swiping market share from the real-world merchants. Why buy trouble when you can bet on the troublemaker?
  • Kohl's (NYSE: KSS  ) : If Target has a "cheap chic" kissing cousin, it would probably be Kohl's. Both stocks have similar valuations. Kohl's is fetching just 11 times earnings with a 2.1% yield. The difference here is that Kohl's emphasis rests nearly entirely on clothing and related accessories. Target sells electronics and media items that are prone to showrooming. That's not Kohl's. Target will experience declines in CDs, DVDs, video games, and books as the digital migration continues. Kohl's just wants to sell you a marked-down pair of slacks and a navy blazer. Clothing will be the last bastion of showrooming-proof retail, and Kohl's is in the right place. Unlike Target's near-term lethargy, analysts see Kohl's growing its earnings by nearly 17% during the upcoming fiscal year.
  • Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) : This may be a trendy pick after last night's announcement of a blowout quarter, but I may as well eat crow after being skeptical of the class act of Cupertino in recent weeks. Apple revealed earlier this month that it will be opening bite-size Apple Stores inside 25 Target stores that are far removed from stand-alone Apple storefronts. We can applaud this as a move for both companies, but when you consider that both Apple and Target are fetching roughly 12 times projected earnings over the next four quarters, why would you side with the laggard?

Take the Motley Poll

Which of these stocks would you rather own?

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Amazon.com. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Amazon.com and Apple, as well as creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz calls them as he sees them. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Sensing that "showrooming" will be a buzzword that will haunt traditional retailers for some time, Rick just registered Showrooming.net. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Frash wrote:

    You mention selling TGT - where is the growth?

    I guess you did not do enough homework - the company is expanding into Canada - is that not considered growth??????

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Popnfresh100 wrote:

    "Target's asking for pricing discounts so it can match the price points of online-only operators"

    Not a big fan of Target right now, but do we know this is what they're asking suppliers to do (discounts)?

    My understanding is that Target asked suppliers to help them MATCH or beat online pricing- that doesn't necessarily mean giving them discounts.

    This is counter intuitive, but the Target-unique products would most likely be sold for less, not more, than the competing brands. Look at Target's Up and Up store brand. It is the absolute least expensive brand you can find. This has nothing to do with how much it COSTS Target to stock and deliver the product because Target simply uses the product as a loss leader. It has to do with the fact that Amazon simply does not sell it and therefore they can't spoil Target's advertising by simply matching the price.

    Contrary to popular belief, Amazon does NOT employ simple everyday low pricing. Instead, they employ complex computer algorithms and pricing bots to aggressively MATCH competitors prices in real time. It's not so much that Amazon has a lower cost structure- the high marginal cost of delivery and the high overhead cost of fulfillment centers means they probably don't- it's more like they just have a larger selection, a theoretically infinite inventory, and they don't need to actually have something in stock to quote a price on it, so loss-leadership becomes more effective.

    The point is, if Target were to try to use Huggies brand diapers as a loss leader, Amazon's pricing algorithm/ scanner apps would simply find out about it and match the discount being offered on Huggies. Thus, the loss-leadership becomes pointless- it gives customers no reason to drive to Target, but it still costs Target money.

    Failing unique product numbers, Target is asking for suppliers to help them find ways to beat Amazon's surveillance mechanisms- not their cost structure.

  • Report this Comment On January 25, 2012, at 6:18 PM, mountain8 wrote:

    If Apple is opening mini-stores in Target, Why support Apple and dis Target? Seems this might be a decent move for Target. I would sure like to see Apple in my little non-megatropilis so I wouldn't have to travel 200 miles to see an Apple item.

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2012, at 5:18 AM, cduance wrote:

    I dont think its just price that is causing people to avoid shopping in stores personally I cant be bothered with the hassle of driving to find a load of shops and then seeing if they have what I want when I can browse the web look at reviews of the products, make my selection based on other actual users thoughts and have it delivered to me not to mention having to pay for the privilidge of parking in a council carpark etc

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1765252, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 3:46:49 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
KSS $50.49 Up +0.45 +0.90%
Kohl's Corp CAPS Rating: ***
TGT $57.62 Up +0.37 +0.65%
Target CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement