Recs

5

Is Microsoft Losing It?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Not long ago, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) was on a roll with its quest to patently conquer Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Android, steadily growing its list of Android gadget makers that had signed on the dotted line of a patent licensing agreement.

The fallen few weren't little no-names either, mind you. We're talking about household electronics names like Samsung, HTC, and Acer, among others. Meanwhile, two of Mr. Softy's targets had the gall to fight back (the nerve!). The defiant duo was none other than proposed Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility (NYSE: MMI  ) and digital up-and-comer Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS  ) .

At the end of December, Motorola shot and scored what was mostly a victory when the International Trade Commission (ITC) said the company had infringed on just one out of the original nine patents that Microsoft had thrown at it.

B&N has been trying to pull out the big guns, even attempting to call foul and bringing Uncle Sam into the fray with an antitrust probe, saying Microsoft's moves hinder competition. The bookseller refused to cave to Microsoft's demands for "exorbitant" licensing fees, going as far as to say it simply couldn't afford it.

In a recent development, ITC staff attorney Jeff Hsu has now said that he will be recommending to the ITC judge that B&N did not violate of any of the three patents Microsoft is alleging infringement of. There were originally five patents in the case, but the Redmond giant has been slimming down its attack recently to "streamline and simplify the issues to be considered," adding, "it was not a concession on the merits."

It's a preliminary recommendation, and the judge has the final say. Microsoft said the attorney's opinion was formulated before evidence was presented and may change throughout the trial. B&N has a lot riding on the case, since its Nook is one of the few growth catalysts it has left and an ITC-imposed import ban on the device could cripple the bookseller's prospects. The only other out would be to pay Microsoft's "shockingly high licensing fees."

Interestingly, Microsoft welcomed another major Android OEM to its ranks just last month -- LG Electronics. That addition led to Mr. Softy's pointing out that it now covers more than 70% of domestic Android smartphones sold.

After gaining patent momentum, it looks as if Microsoft may be running into a bit of a roadblock from the two that had the fortitude to fight back.

It's no wonder Microsoft has been targeting Android, since Android is leading the mobile revolution. With all the patent battling, investors can look deeper to find even more opportunities to ride the mobile revolution. You can start by checking out this new free report on "3 Hidden Winners of the iPhone, iPad, and Android Revolution," which names three critical component suppliers that are helping to drive the mobile devices of the future. Check it out now -- it's free.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Evan Niu holds no position in any company mentioned. Check out his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google and Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Microsoft and Google and creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2012, at 8:30 AM, obviocapitao wrote:

    How much Microsoft patents are really worth?

    How much Microsoft patents are really worth?

    Here's a small list of "features" that you'll find in any smartphone:

    1. Activating the phone using a pin

    2. Making emergency calls

    3. Search engine integration

    4. Making voice commands

    5. Navigating the web

    6. Writing emails

    7. Geolocation (maps/satelite/navigation)

    8. Buying things in a marketplace

    9. Talking to friends via instant messager

    10. Alarm clock

    11. Calendar

    12. Calculator

    13. Taking photos

    14. Reading news

    15. Taking notes

    16. Reading/editing texts

    17. Recording sounds

    18. Playing video

    19. Playing music

    20. Managing contacts

    21. Making phone calls

    etc.

    All these ideas sound trivial? But each of them is covered by a number of patents. In fact, a typical smartphone is covered by 250,000 patents (Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/technology/a-bull-market-i.... If manufacturers paid $0.01 for each patent, smartphones would cost $2,500 -- and that wouldn't even include the manufacturing costs!

    Thus, I think we can agree that patents *cannot* cost $0.01. At least the simplest ones.

    Now, let's take look at the patents that Microsoft is using to get money from Barnes & Noble and other Android phone makers:

    - Patent #6,957,233: Making annotations in read-only documents

    - Patent #6,891,551: Highlighting and selecting elements of electronic documents

    - Patent #5,778,372: Quickly downloading documents from a browser

    Read that again.

    Microsoft thinks that making anotations in a read-only document (which implies saving the anotations in a separate file) or highliting and selecting elements from a document (which is done since the first text editors, 25 years ago) and downloading *documents* are so important features that Android manufactorers should pay a few bucks for each smartphone sold.

    Remember: if manufacturers paid $0.01 for each trivial patent, smartphones would cost $2,500. That's simply impossible!

    What would be a fair value of trivial and unimportant patents like these?

    So... let's consider that the price of a smartphone is $800. If companies are supposed to pay, directly or indirectly, for each one of the 250,000 patents, the price for each one would be $0.0032. Let's make it $0.01 per license. (Microsoft deserves that.)

    That would give Microsoft $0.03 per device sold. Is that fair?

    Let's see: Android manufacturers are expected to sell 180 million devices per year, that three patents would give Microsoft a whooping $5.4 million per year.

    That's enough to hire a team of 54 engineers. Do you think 54 engineers could possibly come up with more inovative ideas like "Making annotations in read-only documents", "Highlighting and selecting elements of electronic documents", and "Quickly downloading documents from a browser"?

    Sounds like a good deal, unless Microsoft wants to use their patents in anticompetitive ways.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2012, at 3:37 PM, leonhart03 wrote:

    Well said, obviocapitao!

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2012, at 5:56 AM, cduance wrote:

    I hate software patents they stifle innovation as everyone is either too scared to do something as a patent that has no reason for being granted was granted by someone with no idea of what it means or they do it and end up in court even though they had no idea that someone had thought of that before.

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2012, at 8:14 AM, DJDynamicNC wrote:

    @Obviocapitao: +1 for that. Great comment.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1775612, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 9:11:18 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
MSFT $29.06 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ****
BKS $17.23 Up +0.19 +1.12%
Barnes & Noble, In… CAPS Rating: *
MMI $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Motorola Mobility… CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement