Recs

12

Apple Lesson of the Day: Design Matters. A Lot.

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

"When you see an object, you make so many assumptions about that object in seconds: what it does, how well it's going to do it, how heavy it is, how much you think it should cost. The object testifies to the people that conceived it, thought about it, developed it, manufactured it. Ranging from issues of form to material, to its architecture, to how it connects to you, how you touch it, how you hold it. Every object, intentional or not, speaks to who put it there."

-- Jony Ive, Objectified (2009)

If there's another lesson that Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) has taught us with product strategy, it's that industrial design matters. A lot.

Steve Jobs was always known for his perfectionist ways, to the extent where even the innards of Apple's computers that would rarely be seen by mortal eyes needed to be designed flawlessly -- a lesson he learned from his mechanic father. Add in his passion for Buddhist principles and affinity for Zen, and you arrive at an unparalleled drive for minimalist simplicity.

Jobs' notoriously high design standards were also why his mansion in Woodside, Calif., was famously devoid of any furniture.

It takes two to tango
While much of Apple's design prowess is frequently chalked up to Jobs, his longtime essential partner in crime was London-born Jony Ive, Apple's senior VP of industrial design, who was knighted in his home country over the new year for his work. Sir Ive had always drawn much inspiration from design legend Dieter Rams, the German designer who crafted products for Braun half a century ago.

anImage

Sources: designboom.com, Apple.com. Braun T3 radio (1958) and original Apple iPod (2001).

Sources: designboom.com, Apple.com. Braun T3 radio (1958) and original Apple iPod (2001).

There's no shortage of examples of this inspiration. Interestingly, Rams has said that "Apple has managed to achieve what I never achieved: using the power of their products to persuade people to queue to buy them." He also considers his inspiration on Ive and Apple products a great compliment to his work.

anImage

Sources: designmuseum.org, Apple.com. Braun LE1 loudspeaker (1960) and Apple iMac (2011).

Sources: designmuseum.org, Apple.com. Braun LE1 loudspeaker (1960) and Apple iMac (2011).

From Rams' own experience, he noted (before Jobs' death) a requisite condition for success: "I have always observed that good design can normally only emerge if there is a strong relationship between an entrepreneur and the head of design. At Apple this situation exists -- between Steve Jobs and Jony Ive."

Sweet freedom
In Steve Jobs' biography, he had told author Walter Isaacson that Ive was his "spiritual partner" at Apple and that he personally set up the organizational hierarchy so that Ive has complete operational freedom and no one can tell him what to do.

Now that Jobs has died, Ive's role crafting Apple products will be accentuated. He also happens to have a knack for realizing the unthinkable, much like Jobs' famed "reality-distortion field" -- it was his initiative to spend millions on highly specialized machines to include a tiny green light that appeared to shine through metal on Macs to indicate when the camera was on.

Lessons learned?
Competitors are now scrambling to crank up their game with industrial design. Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) is trying to be "fun" with its design direction. The BlackBerry maker has even recently released a futuristic model designed by Porsche, the P'9981. That limited-edition device's makeover was purely aesthetic, didn't improve software or internal specs, and costs nearly $2,000.

Mobile-device makers are also following suit, and there's a pretty clear distinction in the design language after Apple enters an arena. Apple and frenemy Samsung have been waging a high-profile war in recent years over blatant ripoffs.

anImage

Source: CultofMac.com, before and after iPhone.

Source: CultofMac.com, before and after iPhone.

anImage

Source: CultofMac.com, before and after iPad.

Source: CultofMac.com, before and after iPad.

Even beyond the realm of smartphones and tablets, Intel's (Nasdaq: INTC  ) Ultrabook reference designs are overt in trying to mimic the success of the MacBook Air. This year should see an army of Ultrabooks whose designs emphasize thin and light.

anImage

Sources: HP.com, Apple.com.

Sources: HP.com, Apple.com.

Hewlett-Packard's (NYSE: HPQ  ) Envy laptop lineup geared toward professional users is similarly a clear knockoff of the MacBook Pro, although the iconic PC-maker is hardly alone with its Apple design envy.

Or lessons copied?
Apple's focused product strategy inadvertently contributes to a sense of conformity among its offerings (a stark irony when considering its famous 1984 ad), and having competitors mimic its designs does little for differentiation or competition.

Rival gadget and PC makers should now be painfully aware of the importance of industrial design. The main downside is that many of these OEMs are now simply imitating Apple's design philosophy instead of focusing on developing their own distinctive blueprints. Doing so could potentially help them set themselves apart instead of eternally living in Apple's shadow.

Too bad they haven't realized that lessons learned don't mean lessons copied.

Apple's unrivaled industrial design prowess is why it's leading the mobile revolution, which promises to be The Next Trillion-Dollar Revolution. There are ways to play the mobile migration beyond Apple, and one of them includes a company that is set to power the revolution from the inside out. We've uncovered a company that has been scoring design wins hand over fist in next-generation mobile devices. Check out the free report now.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Evan Niu owns shares of Apple, but he holds no other position in any company mentioned. Check out his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple and Intel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple and Intel and creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 15, 2012, at 11:07 PM, jdwelch62 wrote:

    Evan: Britons would refer to Mr. Ive as "Sir Jony", not "Sir Ive". Otherwise, you make a fair point. However, it has been said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery...

    Fool on!... :-)

  • Report this Comment On February 15, 2012, at 11:15 PM, TMFNewCow wrote:

    Always a pleasure, jdwelch.

    Foolish best,

    -- Evan

  • Report this Comment On February 15, 2012, at 11:58 PM, fidgewinkle wrote:

    Motorola is a rival that has always had a flair for design. It will be interesting to see what happens as they become Googlefied.

  • Report this Comment On February 16, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Zendwell wrote:

    To the writer of this article, the words, the formatting of the text, the choice of subtext colors, and the use of images speaks to good design as well. Nice work.. I never knew about Dieter Rams. Thank you.

  • Report this Comment On February 16, 2012, at 1:17 AM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Your article concentrates on the exterior product design that is the minor part of the famed Apple design, the major part of Apple's design is in their machines' relationships with human beings, and that include the all-important user experience design. Very much like a romantic relationship, the Apple machines are the best a machine can be for a human being, just like that special someone in your life, you just got to have him, or her, as your soul mate. Very much like a famous movie star, the Apple machines and apps are perfectly manicured, well behaved, and presented, no one can do it better than Apple. The Apple Siri, for example, is not yet another voice control software, Siri is highly intelligent, charismatic, and much more than just a very useful replacement user interface for the GUI that's been around for the past 20 years using the old stale keyboard and mice, even touchscreen. The new iPhone 4s using Siri is so alluring and downright so useful at the same time it stimulates mass queues of adorers from all over the world to embrace it. Even Google Android does not have an answer to the iPhone 4s Siri, and quite possibly can never compete with Apple. Of course, the Research In Motion brand is now completely deadpan by comparison.

  • Report this Comment On February 16, 2012, at 9:51 AM, woodNfish wrote:

    InfoThatHelp, interface design is also part of ID (Industrial Design).

    This was an interesting article except for the nonsense about the design being influenced by buddism and other eastern psycho-babble. It isn't. There is nothing eastern about Braun, Ram, or even the simplicity of Shaker design all of which are of Western origin as is Apple and ID.

    Attention to design has always set Apple apart. Most companies are too cheap to invest in ID which is why they are all just copiers as is very well demonstrated by the cell phone and tablet photos above.

    In the electronics industry, Apple is the only company, other than high-end audio components, that understands the huge value of good design. The only other industry that really understands the value of ID is automotive. Which proves how true the last line of this article is. That is also the genius of Jobs. He understood marketing and design. Other than that, there is really nothing special about Apple products, but obviously it is enough.

  • Report this Comment On February 16, 2012, at 12:40 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    No, this article focused too much on the visual side of design whereas Apple's salt is in the user experience design. Apple machines are engineered like Braun machines, the design embodies the engineering details that are meticulous and simply offer a marvelous user experience that is unparalleled. Observe how even though myriads of Apple clones attempt to rip off Apple in visual design, the contents, quality, user experience are just nowhere up to par with Apple. Apple Siri for example, is not a voice control software like Google Voice Action, Vlingo; Siri is a genuine artificial intelligence personal assistant that is truly Personable, and the dynamic unrobot-like natural language Siri deals with users is simply exhilarating user experience again - a Apple trademark, the users simply cannot put the iPhone 4s down. Apple's engineering design is not only limited to hardware, it goes into software and component level also. One thing is, where does engineering design come from? All designs originate from a blank piece of paper. Ive and Jobs are true masters at creative designs that conjure magical designs that are vastly superior to the mundane competition. To say that Apple did not make gold out of thin air but uses the readily available technologies and components like everyone else is like saying Leonardo da Vinci also uses oil paint to create his masterpieces, it is a gross insult to da Vinci's vast genius.

  • Report this Comment On February 17, 2012, at 12:01 PM, VolkOseba wrote:

    The hardware gets copied... now someone copy the software so I don't have to keep buying apple products!

    ... come to think of it, I only have two, and only use one...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1782010, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 6:19:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
RIMM $11.00 Up +0.29 +2.71%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: *
INTC $25.74 Up +0.09 +0.35%
Intel Corp CAPS Rating: *****
HPQ $22.33 Up +0.56 +2.57%
Hewlett-Packard Co… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement