Recs

8

1 Biotech Punished by Hep-C Overreaction

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Biotech investors are notorious for overreacting to positive data from small clinical trials. "If it works in a few patients, it should work in a larger trial" is a reasonable hypothesis, but it's not a fact.

Apparently overreacting to negative news from a small trial is possible too, especially for a company like Gilead Sciences (Nasdaq: GILD  ) , which has been up more than 30% over the last six weeks. The biotech said that six of eight patients taking its hepatitis C drug GS-7977 combined with ribavirin have experienced viral relapse, meaning the virus came back after the treatment regimen was finished. Shares are down almost 15% today, but investors shouldn't be so quick to jump to the conclusion that if it doesn't work on those eight patients, it won't work on a larger population; these were not your average patients.

All eight were null responders to Roche's Pegasys or Merck's (NYSE: MRK  ) PegIntron, meaning that their virus levels didn't go down with prior treatment. This patient population is notoriously hard to treat; when Vertex Pharmaceuticals' (Nasdaq: VRTX  ) Incivek is combined with peginterferon and ribavirin in null responders, only 32% of patients respond to the drug. A mere 5% of patients are rid of their virus if they're just retreated with peginterferon and ribavirin.

And the treatment with GS-7977 wasn't exactly optimized; the drug was dosed by itself for just 12 weeks. Incivek is dosed for only 12 weeks, but null responders remain on peginterferon and ribavirin for that time as well as an additional 36 weeks.

The only thing we can fault Gilead -- or Pharmasset, really, since they designed the trial before Gilead purchased the company – for is being so cocky as to think that the drug would work as a single agent, on a hard-to-treat population, for a short period of time. But of course, that's why the company tried it on a small number of patients in the first place.

The solution is to combine the drug with others into a cocktail and perhaps dose it for longer. GS-7977 is already being tested in combination with Johnson & Johnson's (NYSE: JNJ  ) TMC435 and Bristol-Myers Squibb's (NYSE: BMY  ) daclatasvir. It seems that'll be necessary for null treatments and might even be required for treatment-naïve patients, but a change in dosing doesn't necessarily take away from the sales potential of GS-7977.

Interested in new technology? Check out the Fool's new report, "The Next Trillion Dollar Revolution." Claim your free copy by clicking here.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Brian Orelli holds no position in any company mentioned. Click here to see his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Gilead Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and creating a diagonal call position in Johnson & Johnson. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 17, 2012, at 9:28 PM, musicbrain wrote:

    The Motley Fool has been trying to beat down Vertex for a long time, for whatever unsavory reason. Invicek cures 90-95% of genotype 1 patients that have been non-responders or relapsers. It is unconscionsable, indeed reckless and questionable writing that you would leave this inmportant data out of your writing, and shows the prejudice you have.

    You obviously have some questionabel reason to support GILD, when this ridiculous trial resulted in a dishonest release from the company days before option expiration, as if meant to sabotage Vertex and other companies with similar drugs.

    I have no respect for you or for Motley Fool. You are simply pawns for other forces. How's your income?

  • Report this Comment On February 17, 2012, at 9:56 PM, johnf50 wrote:

    GILD released data February 2, 2012 from their phase 2 Electron study showing 4 week RVR data with a 100% response in genotype 1 HCV for both treatment-naive and null responders. There are 35 patients in this study, with 25 treatment-naive patients and 10 null responder patients. The negative GS-7977/ribavirin data in 10 null responder patients came from this study.

    So why are they not releasing the relapse data in the treatment-naive group? They should have this information. Perhaps, they want to spread their losses over more than one day. A loss of 14% is enough for one day?

    Because if they have the data for the null-responders... the logical conclusion is that they also have the data for the treatment naive patients.

    Giving the mis-leading precedent that GILD established when they released a RVR rate of 100% before negative earnings news after buying a company for 25% of their previous market cap...

    And they have to release the negative data sometime... why only the null responders on this go?

    If the treatment naive data was as positive as expected... they would be using it to offset the negative data for the null responders.... the same precedent of behavior that they used when they used the 100% RVR to offset the negative earnings.

    But they didn't.

    Why?

    My conclusion is because the true SVR rate for GS-7997 is going to be lower than the current SOC. Low enough to where they know they will have problems selling their product where doctors won't prescribe an inferior treatment regimen to avoid being sued for malpractice.

    My speculation is that Gilead is waiting to see the VX-222 data from Vertex. Because if the VX-222 data is lower than the data Gilead ALREADY has for an all oral... that is how and the only way they recover from this.

    This is poker... and who shows their cards first?

    BTW, any idea how the relapse rate in previous nonresponders is correlated with relapse in naive patients (GT1)? It might be an good measure in predicting the result of the all-oral trial of 7977?

    Based on my data... roughly 2.4 to 1. Or if GS-7977 is showing a 2 of 8 positive response on GT1 TE than GT1 TN should have an SVR of 60% to 70% for PSI-7997 and Rib.

    To make that clear... an all oral GT1 treatment of 60% to 70%.

    This clearly becomes much worse if the two positive GS-7997 patients relapse in time, which odds are they will.

    With a VX-222 / Rib / Telaprevir combo forecasted anywhere from 65% to 85%.... it is probable that in the next few months it is shown by demonstrated clinical data that the VRTX all oral regimen is more potent in GT1(a&b) patients than GS-7997/Rib.

    These are just educated conclusions based on the statistics I have... the data will rule the day.

    The more important thing to remember for valuation purposes is that the data today set GS-7997 behind another 18 months even if it is a viable part of an all oral regimen.

    With an additional 18 months... where will Vertex's VX-222, and Vertex's Alios nucs be? Where will the other 5 nucs be?

    Bottom line is GILD overpaid for a unproven drug and now they are back to the drawing board scrambling to recover... and best bet, they recover in time now to compete with everyone else.

    Vertex is clearly the market leader with one amazing thing none of the other HCV market competitors have at the moment....

    Cash flow.

    And the other item to point out today is that the GS-7997 data for an all oral regimen shows a efficacy that is less than the current SOC.

    The current SOC being Rib / PegInt / (Tela or Boceprevir) where Telaprevir is clearly the better drug for a number of reasons.

    From a liability standpoint, no doctor is going to prescribe a regimen that is less effective - with the exception of the PegInt intolerant patients.

    Lawsuit is simple.... you prescribe me a less effacious drug and I relapsed and I am now worse off... you now owe me $3 million dollars Mr. Dr.

    Don't be 'fooled' by someone's oral fixation. Follow the drugs that have been proven to work.

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2012, at 1:05 PM, applejungle wrote:

    This Brian Orreli, PhD (does this stand for permanent head damage?) is a joke. I saw some time ago he mistook 200M as 2B. For ordinary people, this is fine, but you are pretending to be an expert here and posting articles, that silly mathematic mistake ruined your reputation...

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2012, at 6:47 PM, portefeuille wrote:

    A post on the basket of "hcv related stocks" in my fund is here -> http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/hcv/711340.

    INHX and ANDS are in the top10 gainers list of my fund, see comment #151 here -> http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/fund-trades/705717.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2012, at 10:21 PM, curedbyvrtx wrote:

    This article must be bought and paid for by Gilead or others who want to challenge the effectiveness of telaprevir. Thirty-two percent cured by Incivek of Geno-1???? That's a big lie.

  • Report this Comment On February 24, 2012, at 3:54 PM, johnf50 wrote:

    PegInt & Rib has an SVR48 of 33% to 42% in GT1 and 80% in GT2-4.

    http://www.lancet.com/journals/lancet/ar...

    PegInt & Rib has an SVR48 of 14% in null responders.

    http://gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5...

    PSI-7997 has a 91% SVR12 for GT1 naive with PegInt & Rib:

    http://investor.pharmasset.com/releasede...

    And the thus far released SVR4 data for GS-7997 / Rib in GT1 null responders is equal in potency to the SVR48 PegInt & Rib null responders.

    So the billion dollar question is, "When you deduct PegInt from the mix... does that SVR% go up or down?"

    Clearly it goes down. And it goes down at least 15% from the 91% SVR12 data with PegInt / Rib.

    GS-7997 / Rib will not be shown as effective of an all oral treatment as VX-222/Rib/Telaprevir in GT1 naives.

    GS-7997 / Rib will likely show an SVR12 of 76% or less.

    Pharmasset did a very good job selling the effacy of their drug on GT2 - 3 with the implication that it was as effective on GT1. Gilead has been following suit... but the ride is about to be over when the rollercoaster hits an 11 billion dollar hole.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1783640, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 6:21:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
GILD $50.49 Down -0.13 -0.26%
Gilead Sciences CAPS Rating: ****
MRK $37.55 Down -0.05 -0.13%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
VRTX $64.85 Up +0.76 +1.19%
Vertex Pharmaceuti… CAPS Rating: ***
BMY $33.09 Up +0.10 +0.30%
Bristol-Myers Squi… CAPS Rating: ****
JNJ $62.51 Down -0.59 -0.94%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement