The One Number That Explains Why Apple Is Still Cheap

There's so much debate among my colleagues over whether Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) is still cheap now that it's trading for more than $500 a share. Eric Bleeker points to existing product growth, new initiatives, and international growth in making the bull case. A more nervous Brian Richards refers to history in worrying about the bullish consensus for Apple shares on Wall Street.

Count me with Eric, and not just because the iPhone is winning converts around the world. I'm comfortable keeping open a sizeable real money position and outperform CAPS call on the basis of just one -- yes, that's right one -- number. Follow along in the charts below and see if you agree.

The Law of Really Large Numbers
Most bulls point to Apple's extraordinary growth rates as cause for staying in or buying now. To be sure, there's plenty to crow about:

  • Revenue is up more than 50% in each of the last two fiscal years, and three of the last five.
  • Profit growth has accelerated each year since 2009. Earnings doubled in calendar 2011.
  • Gross margin has improved 9% since 2007.
  • And most importantly of all, free cash flow is up 61% annually over the past five years.

Cash is the story when it comes to Apple. The Mac maker is creating so much that it's approaching what expert investor Seth Klarman identified as "rare air" in his introduction to the sixth edition of Graham and Dodd's value investing handbook, Security Analysis.

In discussing relative versus absolute value, Klarman offers investors guides for what makes a bargain: "[One possible] standard is to invest when a security offers an acceptably attractive return to a long-term holder, such as a low-risk bond priced to yield 10% or more, or a stock with an 8% to 10% or higher free cash flow yield at a time when 'risk-free' U.S. government bonds deliver 4% to 5% nominal and 2% to 3% real returns." [Emphasis added.]

There are two main things to consider here:

  1. Klarman's argument is for buying businesses whose free cash flow yield is at least three points greater than the available risk-free rate (8% versus 5%), though it appears he would prefer a six-point gap (10% versus 4%).
  2. Applying this same math to present circumstances finds the 10-year Treasury yielding 2%. That's a good proxy for the risk-free rate if our intent is, as Klarman says, to be a "long-term holder."

Now do the math. Stocks yielding at least 5% and ideally 8% are "cheap" by Klarman's standards. How does Apple measure up? A lot depends on how you measure the yield, but all three of tech's titans do well by the most traditional definition, which is to divide calculated FCF by market cap:

Metric*

Apple

Google

Microsoft

Levered Free Cash Flow (TTM) $26,061.4 $8,286.0 $19,020.3
Market Cap $484,870 $197,740 $263,600
FCF Yield to Market Cap 5.37% 4.19% 7.22%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Yahoo! Finance, TMF estimates. TTM = Trailing 12 Months. * Numbers in millions.

Value hounds should love that table. Cheapskate poster boy Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) yields a very generous 7.2% in free cash flow as compared to market cap. But it gets even better. Mr. Softy improves even more than Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) when using enterprise value as the denominator, which factors in most but not all of the strengths of each company's balance sheet:

Metric*

Apple

Google

Microsoft

Levered Free Cash Flow (TTM) $26,061.4 $8,286.0 $19,020.3
Enterprise Value $451,310 $159,950 $225,330
FCF Yield to Enterprise Value 5.77% 5.18% 8.44%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Yahoo! Finance, TMF estimates. TTM = Trailing 12 Months. * Numbers in millions.

As great as those ratios are -- all three are officially "cheap" on the basis of FCF yield -- they still understate the impact of held but illiquid investments. I think that's wrong, especially so in Apple's case.

CEO Tim Cook has said twice now that he and the board are giving careful consideration to whether Apple should pay a dividend. If they do, at least some of the proceeds are likely to flow from the $67 billion noted below. Here's what happens when you factor those assets into its Apple's FCF yield:

Metric*

Apple

Google

Microsoft

Levered Free Cash Flow (TTM) $26,061.4 $8,286.0 $19,020.3
Enterprise Value (EV) $451,310 $159,950 $225,330
Long-Term Investments (LI) $67,445 $790 $7,550
FCF Yield to EV-LI 6.79% 5.21% 8.73%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ, Yahoo! Finance, TMF estimates. TTM = Trailing 12 Months. * Numbers in millions.

Not surprisingly, Microsoft still looks like a screaming buy. And while you wouldn't know it from its CAPS rating or the headlines, so does Apple. We've focused so much on growth that we've forgotten that, in at least one way, this stock is also a ridiculously good value. Perhaps it's time we thought differently.

Will Apple ever pay a dividend? It certainly seems so, but you also needn't wait for management to make up its mind in order to profit from generous dividend payers. The Motley Fool has identified 11 outstanding dividend stocks in a special report that's free, but only for a limited time. Click here to get your copy now.

Add Apple to MyWatchlist for up-to-the-minute Foolish coverage of the stock and your entire portfolio.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team. He owned shares of Apple and Google at the time of publication. Check out Tim's Web home, portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Google+ or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft, Google, and Apple; buying shares of Apple, Microsoft, and Google; creating a bull call spread position in Apple; and creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 1790533, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/16/2014 6:28:28 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement