Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

42

The Surprising Signal That Provides "Superior Information to Investors"

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Since hitting a 12-year low in March 2009, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has nearly doubled. But now, a steady stream of pundits are calling for a market pullback (with one columnist even urging investors to "move to cash and wait out the storm").

Investors trying to make sense of conflicting signals got some troubling news last week. Mark Hulbert, MarketWatch columnist and founder of Hulbert Financial Digest, wrote that "corporate insiders continue to sell shares of their companies at a well-above-average pace." Hulbert quotes data from Argus Research showing that the sell-to-buy ratio among insiders is 6.56-to-1.

Though he cautions that insiders don't always have the Midas touch, "more often than not they turn out to be right, which makes sense given their access to inside information and insight. Bulls, take note."

Channeling Peter Lynch
Cheer up, though: A year-old research paper "Are CFOs' Trades More Informative than CEOs' Trades?" by Weimin Wang, Yong-Chul Shin, and Bill Francis contains a silver lining.

Peter Lynch's oft-cited line is a good summation of why: "Insiders might sell their shares for any number of reasons, but they buy them for only one: They think the price will rise."

But, as the title of the paper suggests, all insider buying is not equal. The study found that "purchase transactions by CFOs, compared to CEOs, provide superior information to investors." How so? By combing through two decades of insider transaction information:

CFOs earn statistically and economically higher abnormal returns following their purchases of company shares than CEOs. During 1992-2002, CFOs earned an average 12-month excess return that is 5% higher than that by CEOs. The superior performance by CFOs occurs notwithstanding controls for risk factors, and persists even after their trades are publicly disclosed.

The authors suggest a few reasons, but I like Nell Minow's conclusion: "I think CFOs are just more motivated. Every dollar they make on the stock matters more to them because of the monumental differential in the amount and kind of pay they receive."

Abnormal returns
This isn't just a novelty, either. The paper argues that "risk-adjusted abnormal returns are still obtained after CFO trades become public knowledge via SEC filings."

One important distinction: The outperformance took place after open-market purchases. Although combing through SEC filing data can be daunting, these two tricks will ease the burden:

  • Insider buying and selling is disclosed on SEC Form 4. You can search directly at http://www.sec.gov, but Form 4-specific sites http://www.secform4.com or http://www.form4oracle.com are likely easier to comb through.
  • On the filing, in table I, section 3, "Transaction Code," what you're looking for is a "P." P = open market or private purchase of non-derivative or derivative security.

I'll be honest. As Hulbert pointed out, most insiders are in a selling mood right now, and I had a tough time finding meaningful open-market purchases among CFOs in recent months. After combing through a ton of company filings, however, I found three worth sharing.

Valeant Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: VRX  ) hired Goldman Sachs alumnus Howard Schiller to be its CFO in December 2011. Since joining the company just four months ago, Schiller has made open-market buys on seven different occasions. In my research, I could not find a CFO who has accumulated more shares on the open market in the past six months.

Between those open-market buys and grants, options, restricted stock, etc., Schiller now owns 136,800 shares of Valeant, valued at more than $7 million.

By contrast, Terex (NYSE: TEX  ) CFO Phillip Widman has been making slow and steady purchases. According to the Form 4 filings, Widman's buys are via "payroll deductions through the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan."

Last Friday, it was 50 shares -- the same size of his February purchase. In January, Widman picked up 73 shares ... in December it was 68 shares ... in November, 67. You get the idea. All told, Widman owns nearly $9 million of Terex stock -- some 377,000 shares -- but importantly, he's adding to his stake every single month.

Mark McGettrick is CFO and executive vice president of Richmond, Va.-based Dominion Resources (NYSE: D  ) . McGettrick has been Dominion's CFO since 2009, although he's been at the power utility since 1980.

On Jan. 31, McGettrick disclosed an open-market acquisition of 5,000 shares of Dominion stock (at around $49 -- roughly where it's trading right now). In August, McGettrick bought 6,000 on the open market (at around $46). All told, he owns $11.6 million worth of Dominion stock -- nearly 228,000 shares -- according to S&P Capital IQ. (To be clear, open-market purchases are likely a small percentage of that stake.)

Add it up
I'm going to track these three stocks with a CAPScall, but let me be clear: Investing should never be boiled down to a single variable.

Still, take notice: The academic research is compelling, and the next time you begin screening for stock ideas, this could just be an unusual, but profitable, starting point.

Another place you can start your research is our hugely popular free report -- it's been downloaded tens of thousands of times in recent months -- featuring 9 dynamic dividend stocks. Click here and you can instantly download a free copy.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

Brian Richards is managing editor of Fool.com. Follow Brian on Twitter: @brianlrichards. Brian doesn't own shares of any companies mentioned in this article. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Goldman Sachs and Dominion Resources. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (42)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2012, at 6:13 PM, sfojoe wrote:

    I think one important reason for the insider selling is that the market has been rising. After having stock options trapped underwater, the current market affords an opportunity for insiders to realize some of that trapped value. No matter how much we like to see the firm's managers with signigicant "skin in the game", their families come first and they need to assure sufficient diversification to protect their interests. I hardly view what's going on as wholesale dumping to avoid a market downturn.

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2012, at 11:43 PM, kirkydu wrote:

    I think another reason a CFO might be a better gauge than a CEO is that a CEO might buy to create an appearance v. strictly to make money on that purchase.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2012, at 7:03 AM, haywool wrote:

    Because the chief FINANCIAL officer has his/her finger on the company's finances, he/she is more in tune with the company's direction.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2012, at 9:27 AM, 3Fairfield wrote:

    Interesting article.

    I think CEOs are very conscious of the signal they send to other investors and to other executives in the company when they buy and sell stock and thus don't sell on just a whim. But I do think the market is up a lot and some are taking profits to rebalance their portfolios or exercising old options.

    Interesting about the CFO angle, and from my experience those guys (by nature) are much more laser focused on the overall 'financial' view and also on their personal stakes and net worths and so are apt to 'micromanage' their vested interest in the company to yield best returns in the plus column. It's just their nature and the reason they are in finance and not CEO 'big picture' guys. So, yes, I do think their actions are worth scrutinizing for some signals on what's to come.

    I just read this a.m. that Jim Cramer thinks the market still has room to run but that one never really knows so he recommends trimming back on some (speculative?) positions. That's what I am doing.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2012, at 12:54 PM, kahunacfa wrote:

    As a venture capital portfolio manager since the Spring of 1977, I have either served-on, or had observer rights, to many, many corporate Boards of Directors(BODs). BODs help the company's officer/managers Plan for the Future. Plans work as planned oftentimes, not always, of course.

    In the late nineteen seenties to early nineteen eighties, one small, microcapitalization technology company, an expert in the Test & Measurement industry, the first digital, storage oscilliscope, for example, used their technology and know-how to start developing the Digital Hearing Aid -- those devices are now commonplace. The first working unit was about the size of several packs of cigerettes <but did, of course not cause Cancer>.

    Eventually, the technology of Digital Signal Processing, and microprocessing developments allowed the development of forst behind-the-ear units; now in-the-ear units. Battery life was extended from an hour or two, to todays now almost a week before battery replacement was necessary.

    Corporate insiders started accumulating shares of the company's stock in the late nineteen eighties. The company achieved actual, practical useful devise production by the early 2000s.

    Corporate Insiders are: 1. Always too optomistic, 2. Always Way, way too early, and 3. Sometimes simply just WRONG.

    My typical investment horizon is always at least three to five years for a 4-Bagger -- sometimes a decade or two. Many of the companies I own in my portfolios were bought during the ending of the 1972-1974 GREAT BEAR market. Companies with earnings and EBITDA cash-flow growth of over 20% could be had for the taking at 2.2 to 4.5X EBITDA. Those are still my typical Venture Capital investment parameters. For an already public company, i am sometimes willing to pay as much as 4.0 - 4.5 EBITDA -- especially if my correct fundamental assessment is more faorable than the outlook already prices in the company's current Market price.

    Stuff I am buying now <hint: AAPL <$499>, AMAT, ATX, HCA, HPQ, IBM, NANO, RRD, RGR, SWHC, & XRX> was recently posted on my MF Investment Discussion board. Do NOT just buy these, do your own Homework <at least one hour/company/per week -- including an on-site company visit.

    Kahuna, CFA

    Venture Capital

    Portfolio Manager

    1977 - Present

    le 13 mars 2012

    Kailua-Kona

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2012, at 2:04 PM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    Great article, Brian. High value-added content!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1812223, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/19/2013 5:05:53 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,354.40 121.18 0.80%
S&P 500 1,667.47 17.00 1.03%
NASD 3,498.97 33.73 0.97%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/17/2013 4:05 PM
VRX $78.17 Up +2.42 +3.19%
Valeant Pharmaceut… CAPS Rating: ***
TEX $32.90 Up +0.89 +2.78%
Terex Corp CAPS Rating: ***
D $61.17 Up +0.79 +1.31%
Dominion Resources… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement