This Threat Could Cost You Your Life Savings

It's never been harder to get ready to retire. Between ailing employer pension plans, the long-term problems with Social Security, and a stock market that hasn't exactly cooperated so far this millennium in providing consistent strong returns, many people have simply given up on thinking that they'll ever be financially secure once they retire.

The right planning can go a long way toward overcoming those obstacles and letting you retire comfortably. But now, insurance companies are taking away a valuable tool that many people used to try to control one of the biggest risks during your retirement years: health-care costs.

Getting what you need
One of the most expensive costs you'll face in retirement is paying for health care. Especially for those who need skilled nursing care, Medicare offers very limited coverage, and the big monthly expenses can rapidly eat away at your retirement savings. Yet setting aside enough money to cover those potential expenses, which in some places can add up to $100,000 per year, is nearly impossible for most people.

For many, long-term care insurance has been the answer. Long-term care policies pay benefits that help cover a range of different health-care expenses. Historically, nursing home expenses have been covered nearly from the beginning. But as the industry evolved, long-term care policies expanded to cover alternatives such as home health-care providers and other measures that involve somewhat less extensive services than a nursing home.

Bowing out of long-term care
Unfortunately, many of the insurance companies that offer long-term care insurance to individuals have chosen to abandon the market and stop selling new policies. The latest was Prudential (NYSE: PRU  ) , which said that it will stop taking applications for individual long-term care policies at the end of this month.

Prudential isn't the first to take that dramatic step. MetLife (NYSE: MET  ) did the same thing more than a year ago, and Unum Group (NYSE: UNM  ) decided recently that it would stop offering employer group long-term care coverage.

Alternatively, other insurers have asked for rate increases to make the policies more profitable. Manulife Financial (NYSE: MFC  ) and Genworth Financial (NYSE: GNW  ) were among those asking for rate increases early last year.

Why are they leaving?
Insurance companies face the same challenges that retirement savers have lately. Typically, insurance companies take the premiums they get from customers and put the money to work through various types of investments, particularly bonds.

With bond interest rates near historic lows, insurance companies haven't earned as much income as they need to make the policies sufficiently profitable over the long haul. That explains recent requests for premium increases, but those increases obviously make it harder for policyholders to keep their insurance in force.

What to do
Protecting yourself against potentially catastrophic health-care expenses is smart, but not if it costs you too much to get that protection. Weighing the benefits and options available under different long-term care policies can help you balance affordability and financial security. With a combination of lower policy limits, longer periods before benefits kick in, and other traits, you may be able to tailor a long-term care policy that meets most of your needs and gives your nest egg enough protection to survive an extended period of skilled nursing or home health care.

Unlike some insurance products, long-term care insurance meets a real need that's difficult to protect yourself against in any other way. It's unfortunate that Prudential and other insurers have had to take the step of no longer selling long-term coverage, and if other providers don't find ways to step in and fill the void left by their competitors' decision, then it'll mean yet another worry you have to deal with in your retirement planning.

Smart investing is your best answer to building your retirement nest egg. Be sure to check out the Motley Fool's latest special report on retirement, which highlights three promising stock picks for retirement investors. Don't wait; get your free report today while it's still available.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger ended up being glad his mom had long-term care coverage. You can follow him on Twitter here. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Fool's disclosure policy takes care of you for the long-term.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (17)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 13, 2012, at 12:35 PM, JesseSlome wrote:

    Dan, can't say I've ever seen another journalist actually write that their parent had (and benefited from) long term care insurance.

    The risk hasn't changed but the long-term care insurance policies today are (because of the changed economy) different today. In many cases, the newer options are actually better.

    The American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance has 3 consumer guides that have tips and relevant info (no scares, no pushing) that I believe Motley Fool readers will find of great value. Here is the link http://www.aaltci.org/long-term-care-insurance-costs and there is no sign-in info required to read them.

    Jesse Slome

    Director

    American Association for Long Term Care Insurance

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1813797, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/18/2014 5:51:04 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement