Newspapers Are Finally Getting a Clue

What's black and white and read all over? The answer: Your new bill from the newspaper company!

For years, the newspaper industry has struggled as its subscribers have left in numbers, opting to read their news for free online. With declining subscriptions, newspapers have had little negotiating power when it comes to getting top dollar for their ad space. In addition, fewer readers meant advertisers were less willing to place their ads in newspapers when online readership was increasing.

Well, the newspaper industry may finally be wising up. The New York Times (NYSE: NYT  ) yesterday unveiled the next step in its plan to get at least some of its online viewers to pay for content by lowering the amount of free articles per month from 20 to 10. Print subscribers already get the online version of The New York Times for free, but the company has been missing a decent chunk of potential revenue by not harnessing online subscribers.

The system isn't perfect, either, with numerous loopholes existing through backdoor links on Facebook and Twitter, which easily allow users to bypass the New York Times' pay wall once a reader's monthly limit is reached, but it's a good start for a company whose revenue has been in a downward spiral for years.

This move follows Gannett's (NYSE: GCI  ) plan, introduced in February, to begin charging customers that access more than five to 15 articles per month by year's end. With 80 newspapers currently in circulation, Gannett's no-nonsense plan could actually turn into a serious revenue generator. News Corp. (Nasdaq: NWS  ) (Nasdaq: NWSA  ) has been more of a work in progress up to this point. Its online content segment is thus far losing money, but CEO Rupert Murdoch is steadfast in his belief that consumers pay for online content.

According to a study conducted by the University of Missouri of more than 300 newspapers, it's actually the smaller newspapers that have taken to charging customers for online content much quicker than the larger daily papers have. Based on phone interviews, 46% of all papers with less than 25,000 circulation were charging for online content while only 24% of all papers over 25,000 circulation were charging. Ironically, though, it's the larger newspapers that are quicker to adapt mobile applications for smartphones and tablets than smaller circulations, and I suspect that has more to do with their budgetary differences than their intent.

Still, not every newspaper company has chosen to charge for its online content. Washington Post (NYSE: WPO  ) CEO Don Graham has made it very clear that his company has no intention of charging for its online content. Unlike the Gannett and the New York Times, Washington Post's business is diversified to the extent that roughly 60% of its revenue comes from for-profit education provider Kaplan. With student enrollment growing there for the first time in five quarters, the company itself can probably sneak by without needing to charge for online content.

It may have taken years of resistance and a basket of stubborn CEOs to realize it, but content's trend is away from print and toward digital. Although it could be years before a real ramp-up in subscriptions is seen -- remember, we are still in the infancy of paying for online content -- the long-term growth generating by these online subscriptions should give much of the newspaper sector a second wind.

Disagree with me? Share your thoughts with your fellow Fools in the comments section below and consider adding these stocks to your free and personalized watchlist.

While newspapers are struggling to reinvent themselves, there are three stocks our analysts have uncovered that are dominating the emerging markets. Find out the names of these three companies for free!

Fool contributor Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. He last paid for a newspaper in 1999. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy that's always the right price: free!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 21, 2012, at 1:59 PM, corant123 wrote:

    I'm not sure I see this move being as significant as you do. It's far too easy right now to either work around the limit or to go find the information somewhere else, in my opinion, for this to really increase the number of subscribers.

    At this point the only major draw newspapers have left is local news, and they're competing with local TV and Radio to cover that. As more and more people who grew up turning to newspapers pass on, I think you're going to see more and more of a shift away from them into mediums that offer more of an audio/visual content (tv/radio web sites) or free, if mostly lower quality, writing (Blogs, social media.) A few papers may well survive if they can adapt well enough, but even the ones that do will not likely enjoy the clout they had even ten years ago.

  • Report this Comment On March 21, 2012, at 4:11 PM, fvgetcom wrote:

    Ha, they missed out on me because the Motley Fool IS my "newspaper" now!

    For years, I've read about the same assaults, murders, robberies, etc...just "rinse & repeat" every day with new names & places.

    Now that I spend time reading the daily articles at the Motley Fool, I'm finding out lots more about how the world actually works. Wish I'd have found the Fool sooner!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1833342, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2014 8:08:14 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement