Transocean's Latest Numbers Could Be Misleading

For oil and gas companies, there's nothing more important than reserves, rigs, submersibles, and refineries. However, to be truly valuable, these assets must be capable of generating profitable returns.

Value for money
It makes little sense for an offshore drilling contractor to own a lot of rigs, but not be able to utilize them to full capacity. In short, you have to understand how valuable these rigs, drillships, and submersibles are to the company. Today we'll take a look at Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) and see how efficiently the company uses its resources.

To help evaluate this, we can look at some important metrics:

  • Return on assets, or net income divided by total assets, indicates how efficiently the company generates profits for every dollar of assets it owns. A higher value indicates that the assets are more valuable. The metric is pretty useful when used as a comparative measure against peers and the industry in general. The average ROA for Transocean's peer group in the oil-field services industry is about 6.6%.
  • Fixed-asset turnover ratio, or revenues divided by total fixed assets, indicates how efficiently the company's refineries are generating revenues. The higher the turnover rate, the better. For these companies, a value above 2.7 times looks pretty good.
  • Total Enterprise Value/TTM EBITDA shows how expensive the company looks when compared to its trailing-12-month earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization.

This is how Transocean stacks up against two of its peers:

Company

Return on Assets (TTM)

Fixed-Asset Turnover Ratio

P/B

TEV/TTM EBITDA

Transocean 0.8% 0.4 1.26 15.6
SeaDrill (NYSE: SDRL  ) 6.1% 0.3 3.00 14.9
Halliburton (NYSE: HAL  ) 14.1% 3.4 2.35 5.4

Source: S&P Capital IQ; TTM = trailing 12 months.

Transocean doesn't seem to generate the best returns compared to these peers. The company's ROA and fixed-asset turnover are below the industry average, as well.

But as I see it, the company simply has yet to recover fully from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill, which is why I don't think these numbers reflect the true picture. In 2011, Transocean recorded an impairment of $5.2 billion, which led to a net loss of $5.7 billion. Keep in mind that impairment losses are simply accounting entries without any real outflow of cash involved.

Obviously, ROA took a beating due to this. However, offshore drilling is moving further and further away from shallow water, as fellow Fool Travis Hoium points out. Transocean's deepwater drillships should see increased demand, and with higher crude oil prices, the rigs should command higher dayrates. However, investors should watch out for SeaDrill and Halliburton, which could play a major role in an industry where competition is cutthroat. SeaDrill has a fleet of new rigs and drillships, with more than 50% of them contracted till beyond 2015. Halliburton, on the other hand, is an established hand in the game offering diverse services.

Given the opportunity and Transocean's skill in deepwater drilling, its assets look undervalued. The company also pays a dividend and currently yields almost 6%.This might be an excellent opportunity to grab a few shares. If you'd rather stay on the sidelines and watch the company for a while before jumping in, add it to your personalized watchlist. It's free.

Fool contributor Isac Simon does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Transocean. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of SeaDrill. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that
considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2012, at 1:30 PM, LeKitKat wrote:

    last time i checked, HAL did not have any UDW rigs. How are they going to give RIG a run for their money and any competition in drilling? SDRL certainly but the market's so tight the backlog is big and the rigs should not have to scramble for work

    Why didn't you comp to Ensco or Diamond? Why HAL?????

  • Report this Comment On March 30, 2012, at 3:29 PM, petroglyph wrote:

    Noble would be another better comp. Maybe the writer just wanted another oil service name, even if they are utterly different from RIG.

    And RIG has finished paying the series of 4 special dividends which gave it such a high yield, the current divi has been zeroed out until further notice.

  • Report this Comment On April 03, 2012, at 8:12 AM, artmuseum wrote:

    How is any comment on RIG valid without mentioning

    the Brazilian "episode"?

    This foolish reader requests enlightenment - do RIG's Brazilian units generate any cashflow + if they do, how much longer?

  • Report this Comment On April 17, 2012, at 3:52 PM, spiril wrote:

    Transocean has suspended the dividend.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1851669, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 7:09:50 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement