Robert Shiller on the Bubble in Bubble Predictions

Yale professor Robert Shiller correctly predicted the bubble in tech stocks at the turn of the millennium and the housing bubble in the middle part of the last decade, so he knows a little something about bubbles.

When I interviewed him last week in front of a live audience at Motley Fool Headquarters, I asked him if he saw a bubble in... pundits making bubble predictions. Shiller, author of the new book Finance and the Good Society, explains the etymology of the word "bubble" and why he's trying to avoid using the term for now. (Running time is 1:55; a transcript is provided below.)

Brian Richards: We wrote an article which claimed that there was now a bubble in people making bubble predictions. It seems like every month somebody's calling for a bubble in gold or in the tech 2.0 IPOs of last summer or in bonds or whatever. Do you see a bubble percolating anywhere, and what's your view of people just so freely using that term with anything that has run up in price?

Robert Shiller: The term "bubble," by the way, do you know where it came from? It first appeared in French in 1720 as a name for a phenomenon called the Mississippi Bubble. There was a company, Mississippi Corporation, that on the French stock exchange was soaring, and so they called it a bubble. The tulip mania -- they didn't call that a bubble, because that idea, they called in Dutch "vindhandel," or "wind trade."

That's similar, the bubble imagery, but then the bubble term kind of got discredited with the efficient markets hypothesis, and you would never utter that word in respectable company unless you were a fool. Because they kind of proved that bubbles are a myth, the efficient markets, there are no bubbles. And people sort of believe that.

Now I remember in the 1980s very tentatively using the word in academic discourse, and I thought, I'm going to get in trouble, but I'm going to say it anyway. It had that feel to it. If you do a word count on Google ngrams, especially if you look for "housing bubble" -- bubble has too many meanings, so you can't search on "bubble" -- but the housing bubble, and I think also "speculative bubble," but more particularly a housing bubble. That's really a 21st-century phenomenon.

"Land bubble" is longer back, but I think it's coming into our favorite vocabulary. It's now a word that you can use all the time for dramatic effect, and it's maybe getting overuse, so maybe there is a bubble in the word "bubble." We'll maybe see a retrenchment back. I'm trying to avoid using it now.

Brian Richards is the managing editor of Fool.com. Follow Brian on Twitter: @brianlrichards.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (11)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2012, at 5:53 PM, DJDynamicNC wrote:

    Amusing article and informative.

    And credit where credit is due: we've been asking for transcripts, and you've delivered. Thanks!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1859699, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/19/2014 12:16:02 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement