Big Oil's Big Chance

The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that 25% of the world's remaining undiscovered conventional oil and gas reserves are located in the Arctic, with most of it in offshore reservoirs. These reserves are difficult and expensive to produce, requiring tax incentives in most situations to make production worthwhile. Russia, one of the world's top oil producers, has realized that, and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin recently updated the country's offshore tax rules to encourage development.

Important changes
Russia is looking to draw $500 billion in investment for offshore projects over the next 30 years. In order to do that, the country enacted several changes to the rules that govern its offshore oil and gas industry:

  • Export duties -- abolished! But only for the next five to 15 years, and it is contingent on a project's profitability. This could save companies as much as $460 per ton of oil.
  • Value added tax on imported equipment -- abolished! But only on equipment that Russian companies do not manufacture.
  • Mineral extraction tax -- as low as 5%! But only on the most complex Arctic projects.
  • Additional taxes will be kept low and held at the same rate for 15 years once production has begun.

The changes to the tax laws will certainly encourage foreign investment, but guidelines still ensure that Russian companies must own at least 70% of offshore projects.

What to expect
Previously, Russian state-owned producers Gazprom and Rosneft were the only companies allowed in the Arctic. Look for private Russian oil giant Lukoil to be a big winner here, as well as foreign giants ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) , Total (NYSE: TOT  ) , and Statoil (NYSE: STO  ) .

ExxonMobil announced a deal with Rosneft to explore the South Kara Sea last summer, and on Monday, we got a closer look at the details of the $3.2 billion deal.

Rosneft will pick up a 30% stake in Exxon's West Texas La Escalera Ranch project, a 30% stake in its Cardium oil project in Alberta, and the option to buy a 30% stake in 20 other drilling areas, yet to be determined.

On the Russian side, Exxon and Rosneft have completed 70% of a seismic program in the Black Sea and expect to begin exploratory drilling in 2014. They have also begun environmental assessments in the Kara Sea, with the hopes of drilling there by 2014 as well.

Another deal
Statoil and Total partnered with Gazprom to explore the Shtokman gas field located in the Barents Sea, but recently postponed the project for a variety of reasons, one of which was the uncertain tax climate. Statoil already operates a gas field in the Barents Sea, a region that is estimated to also contain 250 million barrels of oil.

But it will be a difficult and expensive region to develop, making the changes to the tax laws that much more important. Icebergs and freezing water temperatures are just part of the reason why cost estimates for the project range from $20 billion to $40 billion right now.

Gazprom, Total, and Statoil expect to make a final investment decision on the project by July 1.

Foolish takeaway
The Arctic offshore region may be one of the last chances for Big Oil to move the needle on its oil reserves. Though we may not know much about commercial viability for the next two years, it is a project worth keeping an eye on. Click here to add the companies above to My Watchlist and stay up to date on the offshore drilling story.

Fool contributor Aimee Duffy owns shares of Statoil A, but she holds no other position in any company mentioned. If you have the energy, check out what she's keeping an eye on by following her on Twitter@TMFDuffy.

 Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of ExxonMobil, Statoil A, and Total. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 18, 2012, at 6:58 PM, xetn wrote:

    Government subsidies only end up distorting the real price of a product and should not exist. If a product is not profitable on its own merits, then it should not, would not be produced.

    All the "greens" bemoan the use of fossil fuels and encourage government subsidies to promote "green energy". This is also wrong. It seems to me that if you really want "green energy", just let the price of crude and other competing energies play out without government interventions distorting the true prices.

  • Report this Comment On April 18, 2012, at 7:02 PM, rcleven wrote:

    Russia law will change after Exon sinks 40 Billion and privatize all oil gas production when they get the technology to frack.

    Fool me once shame on me.

  • Report this Comment On April 19, 2012, at 3:25 AM, JadedFoolalex wrote:

    rcleven has it dead on! Those fools just didn't learn from BP's and Shell's misadventures in Russia, no, they don't get that Russia changes the rules in the middle of the game, but they will!!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1864827, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/31/2014 2:36:05 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement