Newmont Mining Hit a 52-Week Low. Should You Be Buying?

Shares of Newmont Mining (NYSE: NEM  ) hit a 52-week low on Monday. Let's take a look at how the company got there and whether cloudy skies are still in the forecast.

How it got here
Newmont Mining finds itself trading at a 52-week low because of a perfect storm of bad news. The gold miner was forced to take a huge asset writedown last quarter on its Hope Bay mine in Canada that resulted in a $1.61 billion quarterly loss.

The reason for the writedown was, quite simply, costs. A combination of rising labor and mine-building costs made operating the mine unreasonable, and the company chose to put the project on hold. This move is similar to what we saw recently from Kinross Gold (NYSE: KGC  ) when it placed a temporary hold on the build-out of its Tasiast mine in Mauritania. Agnico-Eagle Mines (NYSE: AEM  ) was also forced to take a large asset writedown on its Goldex mine, which is shut down indefinitely while repairs are made. Suffice it to say, writedowns are becoming a gold-sector norm as the cost of mining spikes.

How it stacks up
Let's take a look at how Newmont Mining stacks up next to its peers.

NEM Chart

NEM data by YCharts.

As you can see, gold miners tend to trade in tandem, but they've vastly underperformed gold (the metal) over the past five years.

Company

Price/ Book

Price/ Cash Flow

Forward P/E

5-Year Revenue CAGR

Newmont Mining 1.8 6.5 8.2 15.7%
Agnico-Eagle Mines 1.7 8.3 14.3 29%
Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX  ) 1.7 7.4 6.6 20.5%
Goldcorp (NYSE: GG  ) 1.5 14 12.1 25.7%

Sources: Morningstar; author's calculations. CAGR = compounded annual growth rate.

Again, you could more or less throw a dart in the gold-mining sector and wind up with an incredible value right now. Aside from Agnico-Eagle and its shuttered Goldex mine -- which was expected to contribute 17% of its gold production -- the miners on this list are incredible values.

Just yesterday I discussed Barrick Gold, a company that has hit a 52-week low and should be able to counteract the rising inflationary costs of mining. Goldcorp actually boasts one of the lowest mining costs in the industry, thanks to the by-products it mines along with gold. In 2011 the company produced 2.5 million ounces of gold at a net cost of just $223 per ounce. Finally, Newmont, like Barrick, boasts a large enough balance sheet that it is able to adjust its operations as needed to maximize operating efficiencies. Investors are ignoring that gold prices aren't far from record levels, and these miners will be incredibly profitable on any gold price north of $1000.

What's next
Now for the real question: What's next for Newmont Mining? That question will depend on whether Newmont can get its cost inflation under control and properly take advantage of near-record gold prices.

Our very own CAPS community gives the company a three-star rating (out of five), with 92.8% of members expecting it to outperform. I am one of those nearly 93% that have made a CAPScall of outperform on Newmont and am currently down 41 points on that call. While that's discouraging, it doesn't change my opinion that Newmont is a buy.

One reason I remain excited about Newmont is the fact that it linked its dividend to the price of gold. This allows shareholders the potential for bigger dividends without actually having to own the yellow metal. Also, as fellow Fool Dan Caplinger noted this month, Newmont's production is contracted out, meaning the only constraint for the company is: How much can it produce? With a price of 6.5 times cash flow and a 3% yield, Newmont appears to be cheaper than ever.

Craving more input on Newmont Mining? Start by adding it to your free and personalized watchlist. It's a free service from The Motley Fool to keep you up to date on the stocks you care about most.

Fool contributor Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 24, 2012, at 12:37 PM, bossman5000 wrote:

    Is there something missing other than market inefficiency with the gold miners?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1869435, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 5:13:35 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement