Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Time to Play Taps for Aubrey McClendon?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

In May, I wrote that Aubrey McClendon needed to be shown the door as Chesapeake Energy's (NYSE: CHK  ) CEO. Given the historical precedent of shareholders inexplicably supporting McClendon and his merry band of board members, I didn't think his departure was possible. Today, I'd be surprised if it didn't happen.

A good deal has happened in two months. The most recent revelation -- that Chesapeake may have colluded with competitor Encana (NYSE: ECA  ) in land auctions -- was covered by Brian Stoffel earlier this week. The accusation is no joke. Brian noted:

Colluding with a competitor to hold prices down for land would be in direct violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and carry stiff penalties. Companies could be fined up to $100 million -- and individuals $1 million -- for each offense. Additionally, victims of the rigging can receive up to triple what they missed out on.

That follows a tsunami of other reports detailing questionable dealings by McClendon -- from borrowing more than $1 billion against personal Chesapeake well interests to running a commodity hedge fund while at the helm of the natural-gas producer.

It's a laundry list of missteps that shareholders simply couldn't let slide, and as a result they've taken a hatchet to Chesapeake's board and governance practices. McClendon was stripped of his chairman title. Under pressure from the company's two largest shareholders -- Southeastern Asset Management and Carl Icahn -- four directors were replaced by new directors named by Southeastern and Icahn. It was a massacre at the annual shareholders' meeting:

  • The two directors up for election, Burns Hargis and Richard Davidson, received 26% and 27%, respectively, of the votes cast. They both tendered their resignations.
  • Majority voting for directors was approved with 97% of the votes cast (replacing supermajority voting, which requires two-thirds of outstanding shares to vote for a change).
  • Approval of executive compensation was rejected with only 20% of the votes cast.
  • Approval of the annual incentive plan was rejected with only 31% of the votes cast.
  • Reincorporation in Delaware -- which would improve shareholders' rights -- was approved with 53% of votes cast.
  • Majority voting for all shareholder proposals -- again replacing supermajority voting -- was approved with 86% of the votes cast.
  • "Shareholder proxy access," which allows substantial, long-term shareholders to nominate directors for the company's board, was approved with 60% of the votes cast.

Clearly, shareholders were ready for a change.

Still CEO... for now
Carl Icahn didn't sink a pile of his cash into Chesapeake to play patty-cake. He's in it to make money, and right now Aubrey McClendon is a significant impediment to that. Regardless of whether there's a near-term end to new reports about his shenanigans (thus far it has seemed bottomless), his presence at the head of the company will likely provide an overhang on the stock for some time to come.

If he steps down -- voila! -- overhang gone. Or, at least, shares may look incrementally attractive to investors who have been turned off by the wild scrum at the top of the company.

And it's questionable whether McClendon is still needed at this point. When investors wax optimistic about Chesapeake these days, it's typically about the value of the company's assets -- often cited as undervalued by the stock's current market value. In a recent Chesapeake press release, Icahn said: "With the Board providing strong oversight, the management team will be sharply focused on realizing the value of its assets and the company will be well positioned to create substantial value for shareholders going forward."

If that's all true, let us give credit where credit is due: McClendon gathered up those assets. But is he needed to sell them?

Apart from all of that, there's a good chance McClendon doesn't even want to stick around. The halcyon days of outsized paydays and using huge amounts of debt to gamble on Chesapeake stock are gone. There's a near-term end for his sweet scheme of getting in directly on Chesapeake's wells. And now he has to deal with angry shareholders and a brand-new board of directors brought in specifically to babysit him. Why not just bow out to enjoy his extensive wine collection and the success of the Oklahoma City Thunder team he championed?

The grand exit
Archie Dunham, the 73-year-old former chairman of ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP  ) and CEO of Conoco, was named as Chesapeake's new independent chairman to replace McClendon. A recent Reuters article quoted Morningstar analyst Mark Hanson as saying:

Given (Dunham's) age, I'm left wondering if his appointment doesn't signal something bigger is afoot. At 73, he obviously is a very accomplished guy. If this is his last hurrah, it's not going to be waiting for gas prices to recover, it's going to be a sale.

Recent reports note that China's Sinopec may be looking at certain Chesapeake assets, but there should be plenty of potential buyers for the entire company. ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) , the only natural-gas producer larger than Chesapeake, is an obvious candidate. Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) is another distinct possibility, as is overseas interest from Royal Dutch Shell.

If there's one card -- and this is a biggie -- that McClendon still holds tight, it's the complex financing he has set up at Chesapeake. As Reuters put it: "McClendon effectively booby-trapped the firm with a monstrously complex configuration that includes seven joint ventures, 10 volumetric production payment agreements and multiple separate holding companies. The architect may be required to unwind these structures."

Of course, if Chesapeake's assets are as good as touted, a deep-pocketed buyer may be willing and able to tackle that financial labyrinth.

Another way to play this space
If you aren’t sold on Chesapeake as an asset play for the long run, or you just aren’t interested in owning anything associated with McClendon, there are alternatives, including one that could be "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need." It's a well-positioned equipment provider that's poised to make today's investors rich off the next energy spike. Read more about it.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Chesapeake Energy Corporation. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Chevron, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, and Morningstar. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer owns shares of Chevron, but does not have a financial interest in any of the other companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool or Facebook. The Fool’s disclosure policy prefers dividends over a sharp stick in the eye.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2012, at 8:02 PM, docdevious wrote:

    McClendon obviously wove a spiders web of cross guarantee agreements with the major lenders to complicate matters for a dismantling of his holdings if the day ever came where he'd be challenged for his right to run the company..Having worked with the majors for many years, most big banks will alter an agreement to suit the situation if the need arises...No one benefits if CHK goes out of business, so given the fact that two major holders control 20% + of the company and most shareholders are tired of Mr. McClendon's antics, its high time he hits the door...The new Chairman is fully capable of placing the assets up for auction or full sale & to aid the situation we now have Nat-Gas in rally mode heading to over $3 per MCF by years end..There are further calls for $5 plus by 2014..Now is the time for a smart buyer to step up and take this company for $30 or better a share

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1926409, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2016 10:34:58 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:00 PM
CHK $6.68 Down -0.23 -3.33%
Chesapeake Energy CAPS Rating: ***
COP $41.54 Up +0.05 +0.12%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: ****
CVX $101.30 Down -0.57 -0.56%
Chevron CAPS Rating: ****
ECA $11.07 Down -0.23 -2.04%
EnCana CAPS Rating: ****
XOM $86.62 Down -0.59 -0.68%
ExxonMobil CAPS Rating: ****