Recs

5

1 Simple Belief That Resulted in a 4-Bagger

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Toward the end of 2007, Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) had been on one of the most remarkable runs in American business history. Just five years earlier in 2002, the company had a market cap of around $7 billion or so. By 2007, it was well over $100 billion. And revenue in 2007 -- the year that Apple introduced the iPhone -- increased 24%.

This amazing performance led many investors to believe that they had missed the bus when it came to buying shares in the company. With Apple's P/E ratio well over 40 in December 2007, the stock just seemed too expensive.

In retrospect, we now know that Apple was just getting started. Fool co-founder David Gardner recommended the stock for the first time in his Stock Advisor service back in January 2008. And that pick resulted in a 280% gain. In David's recommendation, which is included in its entirety below, he concluded by saying, "It's never too late to own a great company." That's a very simple belief that resulted in huge gains for investors with the fortitude to invest in a seemingly overvalued stock. And it's definitely an outlook that can be applied to a handful of outstanding companies today.

Given the extraordinary performance of Apple over the past four and a half years, we thought it might be helpful to publish David's original recommendation on Fool.com. Below you'll find it exactly as it appeared in the January 2008 issue of Stock Advisor.

David Gardner's Top Pick for January 2008:

It's lovely, it's juicy, it's even (at times) a low-hanging fruit. Yet Apple has never found itself on the plate of any Motley Fool service. Until today.

With its iPod, iPhone, and increasingly popular Mac desktops and laptops, Apple needs little introduction. Heck, it's already one of the most discussed stocks in Fooldom. It has nearly 12,000 active recommendations in CAPS (with more than 95% of All Stars calling for it to outperform) -- and I've caught more than a little flak from readers who've wondered why I've overlooked it for so long.

Late to the Party
I'll admit, I'm not a user of Apple's products (though my kids all have iPods), which partly explains why I "missed the boat." While I don't expect this stock to quintuple over the next five years, I want to make the case to you that even using some fairly conservative assumptions, this stock -- which is often derided in the press as overvalued because of its lofty price-to-earnings ratio -- is still cheap ... and it has some great gains ahead of it.

Apple makes most of its revenue (78% in fiscal 2007) from two product categories: iPods and Mac computers. We can now add the iPhone as the company's third major line. Software, services, the iTunes music store, and various peripherals added "only" about $5.3 billion to revenue that totaled $24 billion in fiscal 2007.

I expect Apple's revenue to about triple in the next five years. And to get there, I don't need to make wildly optimistic assumptions. Even if iPod sales go essentially stagnant from here, even if the incredible growth in Mac sales gradually tapers off to about 15% (from the 40% it enjoyed in 2007), the iPhone should get Apple to about $72 billion in revenue by 2012.

This amounts to a projection of 24.5% annual growth, which isn't greatly out of line with analysts' estimates, but it warrants some explanation.

Hidden Revenue
The iPhone -- a popular $399 gadget that Apple expects to sell at least 10 million of in 2008 -- requires a two-year contract with AT&T (NYSE: T  ) , which shares the revenue with Apple. The terms aren't disclosed, but estimates run from about $11 to $18 per month (over the two-year contract) for subscribers that Apple brings to AT&T. That means Apple could receive as much as $831 for each iPhone it sells. If you believe some projections of 45 million iPhone sales in 2009, that gets us pretty close to our revenue triple in just two years without a whole lot going on in the rest of the business.

I'm not projecting 45 million iPhone sales in 2009. I am expecting a price drop for the iPhone and possibly a decline in revenue sharing. But I think the iPhone, like the iPod, is a great way to leverage sales of Mac products, is a great way to leverage sales of software and peripherals, and so on.

So if Apple's sales triple, what happens to the stock? I wish I could say it would triple, too, but of course a lot of enthusiasm and expectation is factored into the current price. With so much revenue coming from an AT&T kickback with a 100% gross margin, we should see Apple improve its net and cash flow margins.

Apple produced about $5.33 in free cash flow per share in fiscal 2007, and the stock trades at about 33 times this figure. If the 19.7% free cash flow margin it produced this year holds steady, it will have about $14.2 billion in free cash flow in 2012. Even at 4% annual dilution (about the rate it's had during the past five years), that's $13.12 per share in free cash flow. Trading at just 20 times that figure will put the stock over $260 per share.

Risks
There's a lot of variability in that analysis. I am counting on the continued success of the iPhone and the Mac, so some iPhone killer like the "Android" phone under way at Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) could hurt Apple, though imitators certainly never derailed the iPod. Could Mac penetration start heading south again after some stunning gains? It's possible, although now that Macs have Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) processors, users have the flexibility of running Mac and Windows software with no relative heartache.

But here's what the above projections don't account for: new products -- the types of innovations that spurred an annual bottom line growth rate of 122% during the past five years. It doesn't account for new twists on existing business, like additional carriers, "unlocked" phones (those that aren't beholden to a single carrier), or dual-mode cell/Wi-Fi phones. Those are just a few of the modest innovations on existing products that could skew things further in Apple's favor. I also don't pretend to know the mind of Steve Jobs, a CEO I very much admire and who has proved time and again that he can outfox expectations.

Though I'm not a Mac fanatic -- or Machead, as they're known around our office -- I recognize and appreciate the loyalty. It's what makes Apple one of the most powerful and beloved brands in the world and what makes it the type of great company I want in my portfolio (I own Apple stock, though it was my kids who picked it out for me!). It's the kind of company you can -- and should -- hold for a long period to smooth out the volatility that comes with high expectations. This is not for short-term investors.

The Foolish Bottom Line
It's never too late to own a great company. And although businesses with market caps north of $100 billion usually fall off my radar, Apple maneuvers like a much smaller company. World-class management and unparalleled products make this one worth owning, and reasonable projections of future cash flow based on current product lines suggest solid returns are ahead. But will Apple really just be selling its current products five years from now? I can't imagine so.

It's one of the best design firms in the world, and it takes fast-evolving technology and turns it into products that people have to own. That's what will keep this company on top -- and that's how Apple will continue to surprise us.

-- David Gardner, January 18, 2008

Get the latest on Apple in our new premium research report on the company. In it, our top technology analyst walks through the key aspects of the Apple story, including both opportunities and risks facing the company.

For more of David's market-beating Stock Advisor analysis, try the service for free for 30 days.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

John Reeves owns shares of Apple, Google, and AT&T. You can follow him on Twitter @TenBaggers.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Intel, Apple, and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Intel, Apple, and Google, as well as creating a bull call spread position in Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 11:44 AM, kramsigenak wrote:

    You kept saying iPod... I hope you meant iPad.

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 11:53 AM, TMFBane wrote:

    kramsiqenak, The piece from David is from January 2008, so it is the iPod that he's referring to. The iPad was introduced in 2010.

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 1:02 PM, dragonLZ wrote:

    How about posting something about David saying NFLX is a buy at $300 (or was that Tom?)?

    Or David saying RST is a buy at $20?

    Or his Satayam Computer call? Why don't you tell us a little bit more about that recommendation (yes, he actually recommended this one as a buy, he did not just mention it as a possibly "great" company)?

    Why did you pick something he said in 2008 about AAPL?

    If he was so right about AAPL, why he didn't recommend it to his subscribers at that time?

    We all say stuf at times that makes us look like geniuses years later, if we choose to have selective memory.

    You using this "David's mentioning of AAPL" as something to brag about (not as personal brag, but as a TMF brag), just shows there are not many calls he can be proud of.

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 1:30 PM, TMFBane wrote:

    @dragonLZ,

    You asked why David "didn't recommend it to his subscribers at that time?"

    He did. His Stock Advisor recommendation is what has been included in its entirety above. We thought it might be helpful for readers of Fool.com to read one of our successful recommendations from the past. Obviously, investors can learn a lot by studying great companies. We didn't intend to brag at all. Anyone who's been investing for a while knows what a humbling business this is.

    I agree that we can learn equally from picks that didn't perform well, so that's definitely something to consider running as well.

    Thank you for your comments,

    John Reeves

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 1:58 PM, dragonLZ wrote:

    OK, John, I was wrong. Thanks for the reply.

    I thought it said somewhere in your article something like "even though none of our services recommended AAPL so far", and I thought that was a quote from 2010. My bad.

    So AAPL was a good call for David and TMF.

    Still, the reason for my frustration with TMF articles and e-mails remains: TMF is bringing up (or bragging about) only good calls while conveniently forgetting bad ones.

    I do understand everyone makes good and bad calls (and TMF brothers had slightly more good than bad ones), but I get sick of what has happened with TMF as of late.

    I think one wasn't Spam-ed with these "get rich with these 73 TMF picks or die poor tomorrow" kind of e-mails a few years ago like one is now.

    Such a shame, in my opinion.

    p.s.

    When promoting Motley Fool Pro, why are they mentioning just things like "ABC stock up 281% since we recommended it", but nowhere do they say Pro is just matching S&P's return so far (actually losing to S&P 500 if you take into account the hefty yearly subbscription).

    I do understand advertising, but in my opinion, TMF is engaging way too much into false advertising (especially, for a company which portrays itself like "we are different than the other guys who just want your money").

    A couple of years ago, I believed TMF was different, now I marked TMF as Spam so all of its "365 picks - one for each day of this year, to get you rich slowly (but don't wait until tomorrow to buy every single one)" kind of e-mails go into my spam folder.

  • Report this Comment On July 23, 2012, at 10:35 PM, SharpNJ104 wrote:

    Two points for me. Definitely David was late to the party. I bought AAPL in 2001. I was a Mac owner and user. I have to laugh at the analysts who hated the stock at the time. I bought at a $10.60 rate (with splits) and am laughing to the bank. Yes, I'm laughing at the title being a 4 bagger while I've enjoyed a much larger return than a 4 bagger.

    Second, will agree with dragonLZ as far as the spam email. That's the reason I initially unsubscribed from all Motley emails, but notice it again after I signed back up. The same, same, same emails again and again.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1953076, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2013 10:55:32 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,303.10 8.60 0.06%
S&P 500 1,649.60 -0.91 -0.06%
NASD 3,459.14 -0.28 -0.01%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/24/2013 4:00 PM
AAPL $445.15 Up +3.01 +0.68%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
T $36.75 Up +0.01 +0.03%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***
INTC $23.92 Down -0.13 -0.53%
Intel CAPS Rating: *****
GOOG $873.32 Down -9.47 -1.07%
Google CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement