How to Build Your Sustainable Portfolio

Patagonia's founder, Yvon Chouinard, talked about the concept of "sustainability" recently:

Yeah, it's a lot like "gourmet." You get gourmet hamburgers now. It's a watered-down word. There is no sustainability as far as any human, economic endeavor. We're polluters here, and we recognize that. All you can do is work toward minimizing the damage that you do. You'll never be sustainable.

It may be that Chouinard has grown cynical after years of running his outdoor-gear company, but what rational company wouldn't want to tag on "sustainable" to its public relations, even if it runs one of the most unsustainable businesses in the world? So now, just as someone buying eggs has to sort through and make sense of "cage-free," "free-range," "vegetarian," and "organic" varieties, a well-meaning investor has to discern between corporate greenwashing and actual damage-minimizing efforts.

How can an investor get a clearer look through the corporate fog of war to buy into a socially responsible business? Here are a few ways to start.

Rankings
First, to help get a broad collection of potential investments, check out the lists from groups like the Corporate Knights. This company publishes an annual ranking, the Global 100, of companies that score well on several different metrics, including waste, water, and energy productivity, CEO-to-average-worker pay, taxes paid, and safety. Top companies this year included Danish pharmaceutical Novo Nordisk (NYSE: NVO  ) , Norwegian energy producer Statoil (NYSE: STO  ) , and Dutch technology firm ASML Holding (Nasdaq: ASML  ) . The inclusion of an oil company may seem out of place when talking about sustainability, but Corporate Knights designs its survey to be "product- and service-agnostic," in hopes of eliminating any subjective bias.

As Corporate Knights argues: "this approach isn't perfect. It doesn't capture the contamination of ecosystems, land grabs in Africa, underhanded lobbying tactics, or poor treatment of civilians in foreign countries ... but we can always shine a light on those behaving badly in different areas."

Be careful to take note of what metrics the rankings actually measure, and who measures them. Even though it would be easy to take Corporate Knights at its word, it still has a goal of selling data and subscriptions. Use lists like these as a jumping-off point to highlight companies that you might want to research further.

Search the Web
Once you've identified a potential company worth your investment, scour the Web for any potential wrongdoings. Check out Glassdoor.com to see what employees say. Search news sites to find information beyond the press releases posted on an investor-relations website. Chances are that there will be a negative take on a company's policies or past actions, because, as Patagonia leader Chouinard said, you can only minimize the damage that you do. Some companies will take no accountability for the damage, while others will be more in a gray area where you have to decide whether it is enough.

For example, Whole Foods Market (Nasdaq: WFM  ) provides health care for employees, caps executive pay to 19 times its average worker's compensation, gives 5% of its profits to community and nonprofit organizations each year, and buys renewable-energy credits. But it received flak in the past for not reporting its greenhouse gas emissions.

Fund reports
If you've heard of a mutual fund that carries your values of sustainability, read its quarterly letters and look at what companies it has invested in. With more research resources at its disposal, a mutual fund that you trust can be a good source of information. One such firm I admire is GMO, led by Jeremy Grantham. He has many great quarterly letters to read, in which he has expounded that "you can have 'growth' -- for now -- or you can have 'sustainable' forever, but not both." And while not claiming to be a "sustainable" fund, as you'll see in its largest holdings, the firm's philosophy resonates with long-term investors. Currently, some of GMO's top holdings include Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ  ) , Microsoft, and Philip Morris International. Of course, you should use these holdings as a start, as the fund could have bought in or sold out anytime in between disclosures.

For more of a traditionally "sustainable" fund to watch, take a look at Generation Investment Management, which was co-founded by former Vice President Al Gore.

Damage-minimizing portfolios
While companies continue to water down the meaning of sustainability, both investors and truly committed firms will have to find easier ways to communicate and cut through the public-relations noise. These are just a few ways to start, and I've left off other means like researching a founder's beliefs, looking at resource certifications, and actually talking to employees. The big takeaway is to take any sustainable claims with caution and follow up with your own legwork.

For more ideas, check out how socially responsible Fool Alyce Lomax invests her portfolio. In addition, read our free report that teaches you the basics of building wealth and reveals "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich."

Fool contributor Dan Newman holds no position in any of the above companies, but he does own one of the warmest Patagonia jackets. Follow him on Twitter, @TMFHelloNewman.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson and Whole Foods Market.
Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Johnson & Johnson, Statoil, and Whole Foods Market and creating a diagonal call position in Johnson & Johnson. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (13)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2012, at 10:04 AM, TMFLomax wrote:

    Great piece, Dan. And thanks for the shout-out, too!

    Best,

    Alyce

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2012, at 10:52 AM, Mega wrote:

    While Grantham's letters are interesting, GMO's holdings and performance are more or less the same as every other large fund company. To a certain extent I think his gloomy outlook is just an excuse for not aiming very high.

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2012, at 2:10 PM, TMFHelloNewman wrote:

    @Alyce, thanks - I'm glad I can point readers to all the work you put into your portfolio!

    @MegaShort, true; I just really appreciate his take on the finite resource future. I suppose under promising and over delivering is a tried and true tactic for any business.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2012, at 12:17 PM, thidmark wrote:

    Gore is a hypocritical boob.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1966407, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/23/2014 8:28:51 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement