No Love for Vikram Pandit

There's always been something a little curious about Vikram Pandit. He's a former economics professor who sold his hedge fund to Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) in 2007. The fund faltered and was shuttered soon after. When Citigroup itself began to crumble, the board of directors decided to make Pandit CEO of the entire company. You know the saying: When a crisis hits, find an inexperienced leader of an ill-fated acquisition and put him in charge of the ship.

Pandit resigned from Citigroup yesterday. He says the decision was his own. Others say the board asked him to leave. We'll probably never know, but it doesn't matter. He's out.

Here's what's clear: Pandit had nothing to do with Citigroup's downfall. The toxic CDOs, the multibillion-dollar losses, the bailouts -- all of those seeds were planted before he arrived. Pandit was one of the only bank CEOs in 2008 who could claim that none of the mess was his doing. He was just the clean-up crew.

And despite being wet behind the ears, Pandit actually did a good job cleaning Citigroup up. Citi teetered on the brink of collapse in early 2009, even after two rounds of government bailouts. But then, things turned. Pandit cleaved the company into two internal units -- basically, a good unit and a bad unit -- and began selling the bad unit's assets. For the most part, it worked. Citigroup has been profitable in 13 of the last 14 quarters. Taxpayers have been repaid for bailout funds. In the second quarter, the bank had the highest tier 1 capital ratio it's ever seen. The bank isn't back to its former self, nor should it strive to be. But it's stabilized -- exactly what Pandit was brought on to achieve.

But Pandit never gained the kind of respect or trust that other bank CEOs commanded, even during the financial crisis. During a 2008 conference call with other CEOs, Pandit asked a technical question related to JPMorgan Chase's (NYSE: JPM  ) purchase of Bear Stearns. "Who is this?" barked JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon. The Wall Street Journal explains what happened next:

Mr. Pandit identified himself as "Vikram." Offended that Mr. Pandit was taking up time with what he considered granular inquiries, Mr. Dimon shot back, "Stop being such a jerk." He added that Citigroup "should thank us" for staving off further mayhem on Wall Street.

And former FDIC chairman Sheila Bair filleted Pandit in her recent book, as chronicled by the Observer:

  • "I thought Pandit had been a poor choice ... he was a hedge fund manager by occupation and one with a mixed record."
  • " ... couldn't we at least bring in an experienced commercial banker to run the place?"
  • " ... wouldn't have known how to underwrite a loan if his life depended on it."
  • "I doubted that many senior commercial bankers would be willing to work for Vikram, given his weak reputation."
  • " ... he was also boasting that at some point it would start paying dividends again. We had laughed those stories off as delusional."
  • " ... no private investor was likely to invest in Pandit's bank."

Daniel Gross wrote yesterday in the Daily Beast: "Four years after the depths of the crisis, perhaps Citi's board realizes it needs a professional, seasoned manager to run the company."

Perhaps. But, look: Pandit actually did a decent job over the last five years, while every megabank that drove itself into the ground in 2008 was run by a "seasoned manager." Experience can be wrongly valued over actual performance. Citigroup shareholders should hope that's not the case here.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel has no positions in the stocks mentioned above. The Motley Fool owns shares of Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (25)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, TMFBane wrote:

    Fascinating take, Morgan!

    It was interesting for me to see Mike Mayo's reaction -- he was of course a huge critic of Pandit. He actually changed his rating to "outperform" from "underperform" as result of his departure. He said,

    "We got rid of a CEO and a governance that went with him that didn’t consider shareholders enough.”

    He also said that Citigroup under Pandit treated shareholders as if it was “too big to care.”

    Anyway, just another view to consider:

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-17/citigroup-s-5-year-...

    Also, it's incredible to me -- though I of course know how this all works -- that Pandit received an $80 million payout as part of the Old Lane buyout...in 2011! As a taxpayer, that makes me weep. :) Like I said, I get that this is how it works on Wall Street.

  • Report this Comment On October 20, 2012, at 8:14 PM, lowmaple wrote:

    Pandit didn't lose 5 billion in 2 months as under Jamie Dimon' tenure.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2061669, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/28/2014 5:26:45 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement