Is Jamie Dimon Leaving JPMorgan for Treasury?

I swear on my mother's grave I had the same idea, but unfortunately Charlie Rose didn't come and interview me: This past Monday night, Warren Buffett told Rose his pick for Treasury Secretary would be JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) CEO Jamie Dimon. 

The guy for the job
Warren Buffett, CEO of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B  ) , is an obviously smart man, as we think alike. Here's Buffett's case for Dimon for replacing outgoing Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner:

I think [Dimon] knows more about markets than probably anybody you could find in the world. And I think that if in the next four years we run into some kind of a chaos in markets some place -- and who knows when that can happen -- that he would think better about it, he would command the respect of foreign leaders that he might have to coordinate with. I just think he'd be the guy I'd pick for that job. 

And what of JPMorgan Chase?
Well put, Warren. I would add that Dimon is man of both intellectual and physical stature. He famously pulls no punches, and isn't easily intimidated. He's the kind of guy you want walking into a room full of ego-driven business leaders or politicians: someone who can stand his ground, but also keep an open mind. He reminds me a bit, in that sense, of George W. Bush's Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, a former CEO of Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) .

So far as I can tell, neither Jamie Dimon nor President Obama have made any comments in response to Buffet's call, nor have they had anything to say on the matter, period. The one concern I have with Dimon being Secretary of the Treasury is where it might leave JPMorgan Chase. Even bearing in mind the London Whale trading debacle, Dimon is still arguably the best risk manager in banking. JPMorgan came through the financial crisis in much better shape than many other banks due in large part to his skillful leadership, and I wonder what direction the bank would take sans Dimon.

That said, I'd still like to see Dimon at Treasury. I think the country could really use someone with his unique capabilities and experience there. But Charlie Rose still hasn't called.

Thanks for reading and for thinking. Got JPMorgan on the brain now? You're in luck. The Motley Fool has just published a special report on the superbank. In it, you'll learn where the key opportunities for JPMorgan lay, where its core growth will come from, all the potential business risks, and an analysis of its leadership team. Click here now for instant access.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 30, 2012, at 1:13 PM, Christy1J wrote:

    NO! If Mr. Dimon runs the Treasury like he does his bank he will be robbing from the poor to feed the wealthy. The ethical and moral state of this situation becomes a dog eat dog world. We are begging for a reissuance of Slavery, if we take this man's lead. Not by race, but by the stripping of finances from small pockets.

  • Report this Comment On November 30, 2012, at 1:27 PM, ronbeasley wrote:

    Dimon would be the best signal possible that Obama doesn't want to dictate policy and be surrounded by weak subordinates who will do his bidding.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2012, at 8:44 AM, XMFGrgurich wrote:

    Agreed. It would be a sign that Obama is trying to make nice with the business community. Dimon's a Democrat, to boot, so the basic fit is already there.

    Cheers. Thanks for checking in.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2134528, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/19/2014 6:47:57 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement