Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Is Stephen Steinour Responsible for Huntington Bancshares' Success?

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

There's no denying the fact that a good chief executive can make or break a bank. A textbook-worthy example of this is Ken Lewis, the former head of Bank of America  (NYSE: BAC  ) who nearly bankrupted the nation's second largest lender by assets through the now-infamous acquisitions of Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch. In our special premium reports on key banks in the industry, we look at management as a component of success or, in some cases, failure. This is an excerpt from our in-depth report on Huntington Bancshares  (NASDAQ: HBAN  ) .

While not on the same scale as Bank of America's disaster, Huntington faced an analogous threat to its mortality during the financial crisis. It reported massive losses in 2008 and 2009, prompting the federal government to intervene by means of the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Its loan loss provisions swelled from an average of $67 million a year in 2004-2006 to over $1 billion in 2008, and $2 billion in 2009. And in the first quarter of the latter year, the bank recorded a $2.6 billion goodwill impairment related to an ill-fated acquisition completed on the eve of the crisis.

But as Albert Einstein famously said, "In the middle of every difficulty comes opportunity." In this case, the opportunity for Huntington came in the form of Stephen Steinour, its chairman and CEO who assumed the reins at the depth of the crisis in 2009. Quite simply, Steinour couldn't be better suited for the job of leading a bank like Huntington. As I noted above, he's credited with growing Citizens Financial, a unit of the Royal Bank of Scotland  (NYSE: RBS  ) , from a $5 billion regional lender into a leading commercial banking operation with 1,600 branches in 13 states and assets at the time of $160 billion.

Steinour grew Citizens using many of the same tactics that he's now implementing at Huntington. Through the Optimal Customer Relationship initiative, he's focused Huntington's staff on the core fundamentals of traditional banking. According to its most recent quarterly filing:

Our general business objectives are: (1) Grow net interest income and fee income; (2) Increase cross-sell and share-of-wallet across all business segments; (3) Improve efficiency ratio; (4) Continue to strengthen risk management, including sustained improvement in credit metrics; and (5) Maintain strong capital and liquidity positions.

He's also initiated an extensive advertising campaign, entering into sponsorship agreements with both the NFL's Detroit Lions and Michigan State University. By comparison, under his direction in 2003, Citizens purchased the naming rights to Citizens Bank Park, the home of the MLB's Philadelphia Phillies.

With this in mind, it's of little surprise that Huntington has experienced a remarkable turnaround since Steinour took control. Among other things, its annual provision for loan losses fell to a comparatively modest $174 million in 2011. It repaid its TARP funds at the end of 2010 -- albeit by issuing new common stock. And, most importantly, it's expanded and deepened its relationships with customers, adding over 240,000 households since the middle of 2010 and growing the proportion of those that use four or more of its products to 76%, a three percentage point increase over the same time in 2011. 

Will Steinour keep Huntington on the straight and narrow? Our research report details many more aspects about the bank, including its strengths, weaknesses, risks, and opportunities. To help you figure out whether Huntington Bancshares is a buy today, I invite you to read this report on the company today. Click here now for instant access!

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 14, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    Stephen Steinour is the reason I invested in HBAN in the first place, and why I continued to believe it will have a great future.

    Sure, there will be ups and downs in the industry as new regulations come into play, and the overall economy shifts on events, but whatever happens, there will be no "gotchas" at HBAN.

    They are on a slow, sure, steady course to become one of the best regional banks in the country, and the "Captain" is most defenitely "in charge".

    JMO and worth exactly what I am charging for it.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2012, at 2:26 PM, twitbustr wrote:

    All IMHO. Yet another pump piece on banks and more specifically, on HBAN. The sheer amount of pumping as measured by the plethora of fluff pieces in just the last thirty days is unbelievable. (Put in HBAN in the yahoo search bar for news and you will be overcome) Where were these so called 'writers' for the last two and a half years? Nothing has changed with regard to HBAN's prospects for growth; absolutely nothing, yet like an orchestrated group of lemmings, 'writers' from what seems every online boiler room all show up at the same time, preaching the same message. It is painfully obvious that when hedge funds want a specific outcome to happen to any given stock or sector, they 'employ' these shill, er, 'writers' en mass to enable the desired outcome through sheer volume of favorable (in this instance) piece writing. Personally, I believe that the economy will tank in '13. How can it not with all of the events unfolding both dometically and internationally? Motive here? So the hedgies can file out of the banking stocks in an orderly fashion and lock in their '12 profits while retail investors 'buy' to keep the price up while the 'exit' is happening. Motley Fool and it's own bevy of pump 'writers' should be ashamed of themselves as it is not the org it was promised to be when first envisioned by it's two founders...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2155121, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2016 11:37:25 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:00 PM
HBAN $10.06 Down -0.08 -0.79%
Huntington Bancsha… CAPS Rating: *****
BAC $16.67 Up +0.11 +0.66%
Bank of America CAPS Rating: ****
RBS $4.68 Up +0.08 +1.74%
Royal Bank of Scot… CAPS Rating: ***