Watch stocks you care about
The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...
Your own personalized stock watchlist!
It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...
Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL ) rewrote the history books this summer when a California jury awarded Cupertino $1.05 billion in lawsuit damages. The landmark decision was the largest patent infringement award in history. Samsung is busy asking for lower damages, mistrial, or appeals. But the enormous damage total was a benchmark in the world of patent enforcement.
Until this week, that is. Chip designer Marvell Semiconductor (NASDAQ: MRVL ) just broke the record when a Pittsburgh jury found the company guilty of infringing on two Carnegie Mellon patents. Pending appeals and post-trial motions, the university could collect $1.2 billion in damages. Both Samsung and Marvell might end up tripling their legal bills if the judges find their infringement willful.
What did Marvell do wrong?
According to the verdict, Carnegie Mellon held exclusive patents for methods of cleaning up noisy signals when reading data off a hard drive. Marvell collects about half of its revenue on selling hard drive controllers (the rest comes from networking chips and mobile system processors), and may have used some of Carnegie Mellon's technology to produce competitive products.
It's a highly concentrated market on both the supplier and end-product sides, so the potential value of any business edge can be enormous. Both Seagate (NASDAQ: STX ) and Western Digital (NASDAQ: WDC ) use Marvell's controller chips, and the only serious competition comes from LSI (NYSE: LSI). If Marvell gets knocked out of contention for new contracts in the hard drive market, LSI stands to win big, while the hard drive makers could end up paying more for the controller chips they need.
And that's not an entirely unreasonable outcome here. If Carnegie Mellon's big paycheck survives appeals, with or without willful tripling of the damages, Marvell would be hard pressed to come up with the cash.
That's ridiculous! Marvell is flush with cash!
The company does have a cool $2 billion of debt-free cash reserves -- surely enough to cover at least the original $1.2 billion jury award. Break it up into installment payments to allow Marvell some operating breathing room, wait for the generally positive cash flows to refill the drained coffers, and all will be well.
Unfortunately, it ain't that easy. You see, most of Marvell's cash is held outside U.S. borders, and would not be easily moved to Carnegie Mellon's bank accounts in Pennsylvania.
Customers in Asia account for some 80% of Marvell's sales. A staggering 95% of operational income flows through overseas operations. The company cares a lot about tax-efficient accounting and holds very large cash reserves outside American borders for this very reason. Marvell's real headquarters may be in Santa Clara, Calif., but the company was incorporated in Bermuda for tax reasons. The effective tax rate? 0.6%. Blink and you'll miss it.
Marvell isn't particularly eager to tell us how and where every penny is actually stored. But only $770 million of the company's short-term investments are held in the form of definitely American securities. All the rest is up for debate, and given the heavy foreign component of Marvell's bottom-line income, it's a fair bet that most of it sits somewhere else.
What's next, then?
I'd estimate that at least $1 billion of Marvell's cash equivalents would be subject to a 30% tax hit the moment it crossed U.S. borders. Paying down a $1.2 billion Carnegie Mellon bill would most certainly trigger that unfortunate event, even if the domestic reserves were nearly bled dry first.
And that's where investors throw up their hands and back away slowly. The company recently kicked off a dividend plan that pays $0.06 per share, per quarter. That's a fairly generous 3.4% yield today. Marvell would have to turn off that spigot in order to satisfy Carnegie Mellon's demands. The court hasn't actually ordered this (yet), but I can see Marvell on the hook for a permanent technology license on top of the one-time damage payments. Those royalties alone could reduce the cash available for dividend payments to zero.
Investors hate shrinking or unreliable payouts. And that's exactly what we're getting from Marvell unless the jury verdict is overturned somehow. Our Foolish watchlist feature will help you keep a close eye on the proceedings.
2013 and beyond
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in our brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." I invite you to take a copy, free for a limited time. Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.