Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Another Bump in the Road for Electric Vehicles

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

As the new year gets under way, more U.S. drivers are getting behind the wheels of hybrid and electric cars than ever before. And why shouldn't they? As it stands, EV owners qualify for hybrid and electric vehicle perks, such as tax credits, free parking, and unlimited access to high occupancy vehicle lanes. However, new legislation may act as a disincentive to EV adoption.

Pulling the plug
In the not-too-distant future, state governments may impose a special tax for drivers of fuel-efficient cars. Some argue this is hypocritical of lawmakers. One moment you're rewarded for buying a plug-in vehicle and the next you're slapped with a new tax.

In fact, as soon as next month, electric vehicle drivers in the state of Washington will be forced to pay a tax of $100 per year, per EV owned. This is the first degree of what many states are considering a new excise known as vehicle miles traveled tax, or VMT. In the future, it's likely that all U.S. drivers would be required to pay a VMT tax in one form or another.

Getting down to the heart of the matter: The VMT tariff is a direct result of falling fuel revenues. You see, as cars and trucks become more fuel-efficient Americans spend less on gas. This means that states are bringing in less revenue from gas taxes. Going forward, some states hope to make up these losses by implementing new legislation that would charge drivers per miles driven.

Moving backwards
One of the major problems of the proposed VMT tax is that it works against this country's current efforts toward becoming more energy independent. Specifically, taxing all electric cars to compensate for dwindling gas taxes acts as yet another roadblock for widespread EV adoption.

Some think a better solution would be if states simply increased the tax applied to gas. As it stands, the U.S. imposes the lowest taxes on fuel of the industrialized nations. Though those people driving gas-guzzlers would likely disagree. That's because U.S. drivers currently pay more than $0.18 per gallon to the federal government in fuel taxes in addition to variable state gas taxes.

Another contradiction to this new tax is that fact that carmakers are being pushed to offer more hybrid and electric cars, albeit at a loss. Specifically, major autos including Ford (NYSE: F  ) and GM (NYSE: GM  ) are under pressure to produce more EVs as a result of new fuel-efficiency rules that were recently put in place by the Obama administration.

The Wall Street Journal reports that "by 2025, car makers' vehicle fleets must average 54.5 miles on a gallon of gasoline, a goal that can be achieved in part by offering more electric cars." Unfortunately, a new tax on these vehicles could make it harder for these companies to sell them. Up to this point, EV and hybrid sales in the U.S. have been steadily gaining momentum.

GM recently touted its achievement of becoming the first American car company to sell more than one million cars with an EPA fuel economy rating of 30 mpg in highway driving. New electric models from companies such as BMW, Ford, and Tesla Motors (NASDAQ: TSLA  ) are also generating speed.

In fact, Tesla's Model S zero-emission sedan made history recently after being crowned Motor Trend's "Car of the Year." The much-deserved accolade marks the first time in its 64-year history that Motor Trend has awarded "Car of the Year" to an electric vehicle. Ford has also seen growing demand for its cars with high fuel economy ratings. According to Forbes, Ford's new C-Max hybrid is one of the 10 hardest cars to find this year, as inventory is quick to sell out.

For the time being, many of the details surrounding the VMT tax remain unclear. While we will have to wait and see how taxing these cars will affect future sales figures, it's not likely that these changes will happen overnight. Still, investors should keep an eye on automakers as they work to adapt to new industrywide legislation.

Ford, for example, has been performing incredibly well as a company over the past few years despite industry changes -- it's making good vehicles, is consistently profitable, recently reinstated its dividend, and has done a remarkable job paying down its debt. 

Ford has been a longtime pick of Motley Fool superinvestor David Gardner, and has soared 48.89% since he recommended it in November 2009. David specializes in identifying game-changing companies like this long before others are keen to their disruptive potential, and he helps like-minded investors profit while Wall Street catches up. I invite you to learn more about how he picks his winners with a free, personal tour of his flagship service: Supernova. Inside, you'll discover the science behind his market-trouncing returns. Just click here now for instant access.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 10, 2013, at 1:04 PM, garifolle wrote:

    This really sad, and so absurd.

    This proves once more how mighty the oil industry is powerful, and the states - which finally make the USA - care more about its oil then about climate change, pollution, innovation.

    It is a shame.

    I absolutely agree that a tax on gasoline would be better: gasoline in the US is one of the cheapest, and probably THE cheapest in the "civilized " countries.

    On the other hand this might be a way to tax the riches, since the hybrid cars are more expensive.

    Then increasing estate tax might have the same effect.

  • Report this Comment On January 10, 2013, at 1:06 PM, garifolle wrote:

    And this would void the federal tax credit, which might well be cut in the new budget.

    Once again, shame on the USA.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2189494, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/29/2016 4:47:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,339.24 110.94 0.61%
S&P 500 2,171.37 11.44 0.53%
NASD 5,318.55 12.84 0.24%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/28/2016 4:01 PM
F $12.09 Up +0.11 +0.92%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GM $31.90 Up +0.30 +0.95%
General Motors CAPS Rating: ***
TSLA $206.27 Up +0.46 +0.22%
Tesla Motors CAPS Rating: **