Robert Arnott: Why I Feel Worse About 2013 Than 2012

Last month I sat down with Robert Arnott, CEO of Research Affiliates and a brilliant and outspoken investor. I asked him a simple question: Do you feel better about 2013 than you felt about 2012? Here's what he had to say (transcript follows):

Morgan Housel: As you look ahead, do you feel better about 2013 than you did 2012?

Robert Arnott: I feel worse about 2013 than about 2012 because we're ignoring some enormous structural problems in the developed-world economy. We have an addiction to debt finance consumption. We've shown no serious appetite -- in Europe, in Japan, in the U.S. -- to rein it in. It's hugely destructive. It creates artificial appearance of prosperity. Think of the family that buys a car they can't afford. Feels great. Drive a BMW around town with an income that can't afford the BMW. Feels great. Then, when the car is repossessed, it feels awful.

GDP is a terrible measure. It measures spending, not prosperity. So the family with the BMW, their GDP -- GFP, "Gross Family Product" -- just soared, because they just spent money they didn't have. To the extent that we're engaged in deficit spending, we're spending money that we don't have. We're creating an illusion of prosperity that has consequences. That debt has to be paid back eventually, and it leads to a lowering of future GDP in order to bolster current GDP and puts us on a trajectory for really disappointing GDP growth in the coming decade. In Europe and in Japan, I would say a trajectory that likely implies negative real GDP growth. Very destructive.

As we come into 2013, we see no signs at all that the policy elite or the immediate punditry gets it. There are parts of the media that get it, but the large majority of the media and, on a bipartisan basis, Washington doesn't get it. Here you have Boehner trying to compromise with a president who wants to spend more and tax more rather than saying, no, we were elected to reign this in, to stop this nonsense. And so it's a very dangerous world that we've got.

link


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 14, 2013, at 12:20 PM, SkepikI wrote:

    Morgan: What a great article! I've been waiting for expert opinion to point out exactly what Arnott had to say.... Thanks for the transcript, it made things easier for me. The incessant presumption that SPENDING on anything, no matter how useful or how ill-advised is good and will get us out of the mess has been infuriating and alarming to me. Why dont we just take all the money in greenbacks, shove it into a big pile with bulldozers on the Capital Mall (spelling and pun intended) and light it afire? That might be less harmful than some of the things our spendthrift civil servants have been doing- like funding crooks and lunatics, or just bad business that ought to have been turned soles up and shaken hard to straighten out.

  • Report this Comment On January 14, 2013, at 2:53 PM, nberube wrote:

    Translation : deficits are fine as long as it's the GOP that's in power. You can almost feel the anger in Mr Arnott's voice. I wonder if that anger was there between 2001 and 2008, when George W. Bush was increasing the size of government every year and turning the surplus into a massive deficit.

  • Report this Comment On January 14, 2013, at 3:06 PM, AvianFlu wrote:

    Yes, GW Bush not only massively increased government spending, but also destroyed the Republicans reputation as the party of fiscal discipline. Thanks George! As I often say, would you rather have the flu...or terminal cancer? Currently republicans are the flu and democrats are terminal cancer.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2194274, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/1/2014 4:48:42 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement