The Trader's Guide to Flu Profits (or Lack Thereof)

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

In case you haven't heard, this is going to be a big flu season. Both New York and Boston have declared public health emergencies. My Foolish colleague Sean Williams wrote an article on 14 ways to play the flu outbreak.

This is a trader's goldmine. Or put another way, this is more short-term hype than long-term success.

Here today, gone tomorrow
We've seen this before. Remember the swine flu? Pharmaceutical companies rushed to make vaccines and saw a nice bump in sales as a result. But it was only a one-time bump that came crashing down. Gilead Sciences (NASDAQ: GILD  ) actually saw year-over-year revenue drop for the first time in more than a decade after sales of Tamiflu dried up post pandemic.

This time, flu vaccine makers -- GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi -- won't even benefit from this outbreak. This year's vaccine is already made and sold. It's unlikely they'll ramp up production. By the time they did, the epidemic would be over. At this point, flu vaccine makers are focused on taking orders for next year's version of the drug.

Hospitals and drugstores such as Walgreen  (NASDAQ: WBA  ) and CVS Caremark  (NYSE: CVS  ) will likely see a slight bump. As will Gilead from Tamiflu, which doesn't change each year. But again, we're talking about a small one-time increase. It's no reason to buy the stock.

A quick response
Flu vaccine makers are working on ways to speed up the process of making the flu vaccine. The old system requires growth in chicken eggs, which can take six to nine months to produce. Drugmakers are slow in switching over to cell culture systems that can produce virus quicker.

Novavax (NASDAQ: NVAX  ) is skipping the virus altogether. Its vaccine uses virus-like particles, a nanoparticle of proteins capable of eliciting an immune response. Trials in both seasonal and swine flu have validated the technique, but short of a major pandemic, the company will likely have to run larger trials to get approved.

Novavax was up big on Friday as word came out that the flu season was picking up, but the price has settled back down today as people realize that a bad flu season isn't going to have an effect on whether the drug works or not.

Thinking long term
A bad flu season could spur more people to get their flu vaccine next year, although the addition will be a small percentage of the overall sales of the large pharmaceutical companies that make the vaccines. Best case scenario, the added sales increase revenue by a percentage point or two, which would certainly be a welcome addition as drugmakers face declines from drugs going off patent.

But an increase in people getting vaccinated isn't sustainable growth. It's a one-time bump to a new sales level. And it might not even last. A few years of mild flu seasons and people will stop getting vaccinated.

A universal vaccine?
There are different strains of influenza virus, and they can recombine with each other to create a new strain. Each year, different strains of the virus are more prevalent, which is the reason we have to be vaccinated each year.

But if a vaccine against the part of the virus that doesn't vary could be developed, then we could get vaccinated once, perhaps with a booster every decade or so.

BiondVax Pharmaceuticals of Isreal and London's SEEK are both working on universal vaccines. Dynavax (NASDAQ: DVAX  ) was working on one as well, but seems to have put it on the back burner while focusing on its hepatitis B vaccine Heplisav.

Thus far, big pharma seems to have stayed away from developing a universal vaccine. Not having to get vaccinated every year would cut into sales, but more people would likely get the vaccine and companies might be able to charge more for it. Pfizer's Prevnar 13, for example, is a multibillion-dollar vaccine that requires just three boosters.

The opposite of trading
The best investing approach is to choose great companies and stick with them for the long term. If you're an investor looking for big long-term winners, Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner's picks have frequently trounced the market. How? Because he's always on the lookout for revolutionary stocks and recommends them before Wall Street catches on to their disruptive potential. If you're interested in how David discovers his winners, click here to get instant access to a personal tour behind David's Supernova service.

Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (16)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2013, at 12:51 PM, ikkyu2 wrote:

    This article isn't very insightful. Big Pharma has not "stayed away" from developing a vaccine that targets the unchanging part of the flu virus; those parts of the virus are not very antigenic. That is why the virus did not evolve in such a way to make them changeable year to year. If it were easy for people to mount an immune response to those parts of the virus, it would have happened naturally and flu pandemics would not occur. The idea of targeting that part of the virus with a vaccine is a hard target; if it were not it would have been solved decades ago.

    The analogy to Prevnar is not good; Prevnar vaccinates against bacteria, not a virus, and the bacteria in question do not produce epidemics; they infect relatively-immunocompromised people.

    I would be cautious with Tamiflu as well. Recent clinical data published last year suggest that the drug has no benefit and that the initial positive trial results were a fluke or were misinterpreted.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2013, at 1:02 PM, lihpd wrote:

    Why is this all blue and unreadable?

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2013, at 1:08 PM, lihpd wrote:

    The second attempt loaded as normal with no problem.

  • Report this Comment On January 17, 2013, at 7:33 PM, ikkyu2 wrote:

    I posted some links in a second comment to correlate my comment above, by the way, but they were not posted. The Cochrane Reviews and Google are good places to start.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2197525, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/28/2016 6:41:35 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 9 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,228.30 133.47 0.74%
S&P 500 2,159.93 13.83 0.64%
NASD 5,305.71 48.22 0.92%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/27/2016 4:00 PM
CVS $90.56 Up +0.64 +0.71%
CVS Health CAPS Rating: *****
DVAX $10.91 Down -0.15 -1.36%
Dynavax Technologi… CAPS Rating: ***
NVAX $2.28 Down -0.07 -2.98%
Novavax CAPS Rating: **
NVS $80.88 Up +0.15 +0.19%
Novartis CAPS Rating: ****
WBA $80.97 Up +0.29 +0.36%
Walgreens Boots Al… CAPS Rating: ****
AZN $33.61 Up +0.06 +0.18%
AstraZeneca CAPS Rating: ****
GILD $79.25 Down -1.37 -1.70%
Gilead Sciences CAPS Rating: *****