Trial Reveals Silicon Valley's Dirty Laundry and a Steve Jobs Threat

A court filing released Tuesday showed that in 2007, Apple's (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) co-founder Steve Jobs threatened Palm's then-CEO Edward Colligan with a patent war if Palm wouldn't stop recruiting Apple employees.

The late Jobs' communications to Colligan -- and to others -- were revealed in the course of a civil lawsuit brought against Apple, Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) , Intel, among other high-tech companies, by five workers claiming an illegal conspiracy to keep wages low by agreeing not to recruit each other's employees.

The defendants wanted to keep their documents buried, but U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled that some must be made part of the public record.

According to a sworn statement made by Colligan, Jobs' quid pro quo offer that the two companies stop any employee poaching was seasoned by "Mr. Jobs [suggesting] that if Palm did not agree to such an arrangement, Palm could face lawsuits alleging infringement of Apple's many patents."

In a note to Colligan, Jobs' did more than imply that with Apple's huge treasury any court battle between their two companies would not be much of a contest.

"I'm sure you realize the asymmetry in the financial resources of our respective companies when you say: 'We will both just end up paying a lot of lawyers a lot of money,'" Jobs wrote.

Future iPhone threat
Jobs also had concerns about another even more significant company trying to lure away Apple employees -- and rightfully so, as this 2006 note to Google CEO Eric Schmidt reveals:

"Eric, I am told that Googles new cell phone software group is relentlessly recruiting in our iPod group. If this is indeed true, can you put a stop to it? Thanks, Steve"

It's hard to swallow, but here's Schmidt's reply:

"I'm sorry to hear this; we have a policy of no recruiting of Apple employees. I will investigate immediately ! Eric"

The above communications -- and several more from Adobe, LucasFilm, Intel, and Pixar -- can be found on The Verge, and make it look like the plaintiffs may have a strong case. Judge Koh is deciding if their suit should go forward as a class action. If so, the damages could be substantial.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2210954, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/30/2014 10:06:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement