The Cost of Keeping Risk Cheap, and the Next Bubble

The American public was rightly outraged at the bailouts of Wall Street, particularly Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , AIG (NYSE: AIG  ) , and Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , which each took (and needed) tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer money to stay afloat.

In each case, the public fuming centered on shareholders getting bailed out. But that was a slightly misrepresented view. Shares of the heavily bailed-out banks fell more than 90%, and because of heavy share dilution from bailout funds, most of those losses will never be recouped. Far from walking away scot-free, shareholders lost nearly everything.

The real outrage should have been targeted at bondholders. They are the group that financed a bank's outrageous risk-taking during the bubble, and walked away with 100 cents on the dollar after the bailouts. That story didn't make many headlines because the world of debt markets is so foreign to most Americans, whereas the stock market is familiar. But the debt markets are where the real bailouts took place. And if you want to look for where there is moral hazard -- where investors feel they can take risk without facing any downside -- that's where you need to look.

Last week I sat down with Ron Suskind, a former Wall Street Journal reporter and Pulitzer Prize-winning author of five books. We got to talking about public policy, which led into a conversation about the cost of risk. Here's what he had to say (transcript follows):

Ron Suskind: "The fact of the matter is, a fundamental structural issue that hasn't changed, is guiding events. And if you read Ken Rogoff or Carmen Reinhardt, their book This Time is Different, the single sentence, if you want to save yourself a 700-page read, is basically that risk is artificially underpriced in the current U.S. and largely global economy by edict and effort -- often right-minded and well-intentioned -- of governments. They say we're going to keep debt and largely risk cheap.

"When you do that, you create bubbles. It's like a law of physics! It's like the sun rising in the east! And it's no different than it has been since the 1980s in the United States -- every bubble bigger, every burst a little harder to recover from. And literally the question is not whether there is now a bubble, but where; where it will express itself, where it will inflate. And that's because we have not dealt with the underlying structural issues of getting risk properly priced. And the way you do that is for there to be a bite in terms of the debt markets. People to take real haircuts. Like, 'Wow, we're ruined. Now we know better, in terms of the due diligence necessary to buy this thing called debt,' and to deal with these issues of downside risk. That's what gets risk properly priced, and we're not doing that now."

To learn more about the most talked-about bank out there, check out our in-depth company report on Bank of America. Just click here to get access.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2013, at 6:07 PM, sciencedave wrote:

    The bond holders may have financed this but the decision makers were the bankers. The outrage should be directed to them since they all still managed to keep their outrageous salaries and bonuses in most cases. These companies and individuals should have been held more accountable. The government has encouraged this risky behavior in many industries from banks to auto to airlines. Because of this they have all become poor and non-transparent investments areas.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2222151, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/22/2014 8:07:24 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement