Dissecting a Huge Miss From Arch Coal's Earnings

It's difficult to imagine analysts falling prey to lofty expectations within an industry this deeply buried in weakness, but that's precisely what occurred this week after coal miner Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI  ) released earnings for the fourth quarter and full year of 2012.

In the defense of those analysts, let's begin by pointing out only a small portion of the large $0.28 per share gap -- between analysts' consensus for a loss of $0.14 per share and Arch Coal's adjusted loss of $0.42 per share -- can be linked back to Arch's operating performance. With a couple of exceptions that we'll touch upon below, Arch performed as expected within an extremely challenging market environment for U.S. coal miners.

One major downside surprise came in the form of a $58 million loss booked on a contract settlement relating to the bankruptcy of Patriot Coal. Unlike the separate $230 million in goodwill and asset impairment charges incurred during the quarter, that $58 million hit (roughly $0.22 per share) does carry through to adjusted earnings.

Compared to its peers, meanwhile, Arch Coal's asset impairment charges for 2012 -- totaling $346 million -- were relatively tame. Walter Energy (NYSE: WLT  ) booked a huge $1.1 billion charge during the third quarter, Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE: CLF  ) made $1.4 billion disappear, and Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU  ) recorded goodwill impairment and mine closure costs totaling $929 million for 2012. Either Arch Coal paid a more reasonable price for the assets acquired through its 2011 purchase of International Coal than did its peers through their respective acquisitions, or perhaps further charges will follow in 2013. Time will tell, but it's worth noting that Arch now carries only $265 million in goodwill on its balance sheet after the fourth-quarter writedown.

Dissecting Arch's operating performance as it relates to the earnings miss, one item that jumps out at me is the company's increased operating cost within the Powder River Basin, or PRB. While operating its assets within that region "at significantly reduced production levels," the company is struggling to defend operating margins as costs creep upward accordingly. For the fourth quarter, Arch's PRB operating margin actually slipped into negative territory at -$0.06 per ton. Even at reduced production rates, the PRB still accounted for 74% of Arch Coal's consolidated production volume, so investors will want to pay close attention to the profitability of that unit going forward.

The coal industry in the United States has been in a state of flux since the arrival of a cheaper alternative for energy production: natural gas. Exports are becoming a much bigger part of the domestic coal landscape, and Peabody Energy has deals in place to get its cheaper coal from the Powder River and Illinois Basins to India, China, and the EU. For investors looking to capitalize on a rebound in the U.S. coal market, The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is perhaps most worthy of your consideration. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource -- simply click here now to claim your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (8)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2013, at 9:34 PM, PaulEngr wrote:

    Draglines are exponentially less efficient as depth increases. The PRB becomes unminable using current technology in 10-20 years due to the fact that the coal seam is on a slight grade downward.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2237236, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/27/2014 11:31:01 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement