This Dividend Cut Is Likely a Positive for Investors

Despite its dividend cut, Exelon is well-positioned for the future of energy
As the nation moves increasingly toward clean energy, Exelon is perfectly positioned to capitalize. Not only does the company have the largest nuclear fleet in North America, but its investing to grow its wind and solar portfolio. Combine this strength with EXC's recent merger with Constellation, and it places Exelon on a short list of top utilities. To determine if Exelon is a good long-term fit for your portfolio, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's premium research report on the company. Simply click here now for instant access.

Well, at least the company can say you were warned. Exelon  (NYSE: EXC  )  finally ended months of speculation and announced that it will be cutting its dividend. Starting in the second quarter it'll be going from the current rate of $0.525 per share to $0.31 per share. 

As a soon-to-be investor in Exelon I'm not exactly thrilled by the cut; I was looking forward to that nice chunk of quarterly cash flow. What's important to understand, though, is the reason behind the cut and if it makes sense. For Exelon, the idea behind the 41% haircut is so that it can maintain its investment grade credit rating, and invest the cash in growth projects. I can certainly understand the company wanting to maintain its credit rating. My question is: How does the company plan to grow? 

As investors know well, Exelon owns the nation's largest fleet of nuclear power plants. However, given the shear cost involved to build a new plant, as well navigate the difficult regulatory environment, the company won't be building a new unit any time soon. Instead, the company is investing in nuclear uprates to grow its nuclear generation. This entails investing in the components necessary to increase the generating power of a reactor. 

These are lower-risk, higher-return investments for the company. When executed across its portfolio, the uprates will increase Exelon's generation capacity to an output equivalent of adding a new unit. Even better, the uprates will be accomplished at a substantially reduced cost. 

Exelon is not alone in using uprates to grow its nuclear capacity. Fellow clean energy generator, NextEra Energy (NYSE: NEE  ) is investing $1.5 billion on its own uprate program to add 400 MW of nuclear capacity. The company had filed to build two new 1,100-MW nuclear reactors, but no decision on the reactors is likely until 2014, for the $12 billion-$18 billion project is not likely to enter into service until at least 2022. As you can see, uprates have quite the return on investment. 

Looking past uprates, Exelon is also investing in renewable energy to generate even more nuclear generation growth. One example is the company's new 230-MW solar farm in California that First Solar  (NASDAQ: FSLR  )  is building. The $1.36 billion dollar project will include more than 3 million solar panels and will be operated by First Solar. The power has been contracted out to PG&E under a long-term contract. 

These long-term power purchase agreements are important because they generate steady, predictable returns for the company. Not only that, but as Exelon CEO Christopher Crane noted: "[When] the balance sheet is tight like it is right now, you would want to make investments that have a short investment period ... wind and other smaller assets really do fit that profile. Within a year, you're getting a return."  

That's likely why the company will continue spending a bulk of its growth capital on these quick-turnaround growth projects at the expense of its dividend. Essentially, management is saying that it believes it can earn its investors a greater return on their money by investing in these high-return, quick-payback projects than they could earn if the company kept up the payout. So, while no one likes to see a pay cut, this one shouldn't scare you.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2013, at 3:54 PM, mattack2 wrote:

    "but its investing to grow its wind and solar portfolio."

    *it's* investing...

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2013, at 3:58 PM, mattack2 wrote:

    "given the shear cost"

    sheer cost.

    GET AN EDITOR.

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2013, at 8:41 AM, TMFmd19 wrote:

    I have one, these must have slipped through :)

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2013, at 1:28 PM, gskinner75006 wrote:

    mattack2, lol! Not much to do where you live huh?

  • Report this Comment On February 10, 2013, at 3:45 PM, TMFBlacknGold wrote:

    Matt is right. The dividend cut is the right move. Besides, the new dividend is still yielding 4%.

    ––Maxxwell

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2013, at 9:05 AM, ravens9111 wrote:

    The dividend cut is reflected in the stock price. The decline in the stock anticipated this move. If you buy at these levels, you should do well in the long run. However, who knows if further cuts are needed? If another dividend cut is on the horizon in the future, the stock will drop more to maintain that yield.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2242996, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/24/2014 7:42:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement