The obesity drug war is about to begin.
Investors are anxiously waiting for the launch of Arena Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:ARNA) and Eisai's obesity drug Belviq, which will match up with VIVUS' (NASDAQ:VVUS) Qsymia, which hit pharmacies a few months ago. We'll also get safety data for Orexigen's (NASDAQ:OREX) Contrave later this year, which could put it on the market a few months after that.
But Belviq, Qsymia, and Contrave aren't the first obesity drugs on the market. We've been to this rodeo before. And it wasn't pretty.
A lean history lesson on obesity treatments
Lesson number one: no obesity drug has ever been a blockbuster because of a combination of minimal efficacy combined with safety issues.
Wyeth's Fen-phen, and Abbott Labs' (NYSE:ABT) Meridia, were pulled from the market because of side effect issues. Roche's Xenical is still on the market, but has never racked up monster sales because the drug causes some rather unpleasant side effects. It blocks the uptake of fat, and if patients eat too much fat, let's just say that it isn't pretty when it passes out the other end. GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) said it plans to sell Alli, the over-the-counter version of Xexical, presumably because it never reached full potential .
There's a startlingly large number of American's that are obese, 78 million adults according to the last count by the CDC . If you charged them all $1,000 per year for an obesity drug, that's a potential $78 billion market. And yet no drug can get to $1 billion. What's the problem?
Let me be blunt
There's one thing some people trying to lose extra weight struggle with: laziness. I speak from experience; I've lost a whopping five pounds since I joined my gym more than a year ago. That extra helping of desert is so tempting. So is the snooze alarm.
The characterization is a generalization, of course. There are reasons that people have trouble losing weight other than laziness. But when it comes to drug sales, generalizing is OK. It's the actions of a large majority that will drive drug sales, not the minority that proves the rule.
Those lazy people are now looking for an easy way to lose weight by taking Belviq and Qsymia, but, unfortunately, there's no easy way to shed substantial pounds. It takes exercise and dieting to lose weight.
But patients lost weight in clinical trials
Yes they did. The drugs help patients lose weight, but it's extra weight loss. Almost half of the weight loss seen in the Belviq trials, for instance, could be attributed to lifestyle changes. Patients in the placebo arms of the combined phase 3 trials lost 2.5% of their body weight, compared to 5.8% for patients taking Belviq .
People willing to enter a clinical trial for an unproven drug are likely a lot more motivated to lose weight than the general public. Remember all those side effect issues from other drugs?
And only some of the patients in the trial were actually motivated to lose the weight. A whopping 50% of patients in one of the Belviq trials withdrew before completing one year of the trial.
The key for the obesity drugmakers to hit $1 billion in sales is not only to convince doctors to prescribe their drugs, but for patients to stay on the drug for an extended period of time. I predict that many lazy patients will take the drug, but not change their lifestyles, because they're looking for an easy fix. After a few months, they won't see any dramatic results, and they'll stop taking the medication.
One of the barriers to staying on the obesity drugs is the price. Even if a patient is only seeing modest weight loss, they'll be more likely to stay on the drug if they're paying the standard co-pay of $20-$50 per month -- that's the cost of a gym membership with a lot less work -- than they would if they're playing the full price of around $160 .
The companies have made some strides into gaining insurance coverage, but they have a long way to go. Gaining history-setting blockbuster status isn't going to be easy for any of the three obesity drugs, but insurers are likely the key to get there.
Fool contributor Brian Orelli has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.