Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



The Secret Behind LINN Energy's Secret Sauce

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Units of LINN Energy (NASDAQOTH: LINEQ  ) , and to a lesser degree its affiliate LinnCo (UNKNOWN: LNCO.DL  ) , where hit with a one-two punch last Friday. First, an analyst began to question the company's hedging practices, saying its accounting for those derivatives is questionable at best. Those questions were then amplified in a Barron's article over the weekend. With the spotlight now shining brightly on LINN, what's an investor to do? Before we get to that, let's take a deeper look at what's at issue.

A word about risk
Let's state the obvious here and note that investing is a risky business. You are buying ownership interests in companies that themselves face a set of risks that could put any one of them out of business. The ability to navigate those risks in an effort to survive and then thrive is what makes winners and losers.

Investing in energy is no different. One of the big risks investors face is from commodity prices which are notoriously volatile. Just ask investors in Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK  ) , who went from riding high as natural gas prices rose, only to collapse along with them. To help mitigate that risk and navigate past it many energy companies will use hedges. Most energy companies, though, will only hedge a portion of production, and usually only for the next year or so. 

Using Chesapeake as an example, as of its last hedging update in November, the company had only hedged 76% of its fourth-quarter oil and natural gas production. Further, the company has hedged just 69% of its 2013 oil production. What's most interesting is that the nation's No. 2 natural gas producer had not hedged any of that production for 2013, leaving it completely vulnerable to the whims of the market. While operational risks abound at Chesapeake, the added risk of commodity exposure leads investors to endure a potentially wild ride.

LINN's secret sauce
LINN Energy takes a different approach -- the company hedges 100% of its oil and natural gas, not just for the next year, but through 2016 for oil and 2017 for natural gas. The company refers to this as its "secret sauce" because this long-term, 100%-hedged discipline is unique to LINN. It's unique even among its peer group of oil and natural gas producers organized as master limited partnerships. 

Within that group is BreitBurn Energy Partners (NASDAQOTH: BBEPQ  ) , which, while well hedged, isn't hedged for as long nor to the same extent as LINN. The company's stated goal is to consistently hedge a high percentage of future production. Specifically, 80% of current production, 75% of the following year's production, dropping to 60% in year three, and 50% in year four. Like LINN, its hedging program is a core of its business strategy and not a trading tool. 

LINN sees hedging as its way to lock in a minimum cash flow for the next few years. How it hedges leaves room for some upside but most of LINN's growth comes from either acquisitions or through the drill bit. When you invest in LINN you're not investing in the upside of commodity prices, you are investing in the constancy of its cash flow. Put another way, you are investing in the thesis that we need energy each and every day, but not in the price that is paid to keep the lights on and the car running.

A practical example
Let's take a look at what LINN does in a more practical way that you, as an investor, might understand. Last year LINN bought $2.8 billion in assets. Each time LINN buys an asset two things in the press releases stand out that you would'nt see elsewhere. LINN will note that the deal was immediately accretive to distributable cash flow per unit. Typically, for every $100 million of assets LINN acquires it expects to generate $0.02 additional distributable cash flow. LINN spends up to 10% of the acquisition price to hedge the production out four to six years.

Let's say you, as an investor, want to lock in a dividend and future sale price but did not want to expose your portfolio to the volatility of the underlying stock. Your options are limited, but you do have, well, options. For this example we'll use Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A  ) , which currently has a dividend over 5%, global operations, and a fortress-like balance sheet. You can, as of this writing, buy shares for around $65.50 and hedge those shares for the next two years using options. You can buy a January 2015 $65 put for around $7.70 a share. Your total investment would be $7,320 and you would, in essence, lock in a 4.7% yield with virtually no downside risk for the next two years. The upside is yours to keep. 

This is the essence of what LINN does, but instead of hedging 100% through buying puts, LINN's hedging strategy is to use 70% swaps, which are fixed price contracts, and 30% puts. Swaps are no more than fixed rate contracts where LINN is essentially selling tomorrow's production at an already agreed upon price. Taken together, LINN is locking in its minimum future sales price, which locks in its cash flow for the next four to six years, with the puts providing some additional upside. 

Foolish bottom line
Investors need to realize that LINN was the first MLP-type upstream oil and gas producer to go public. Now that the company has gained popularity among investors in this low yield environment it's not surprising that the company is also now being put under a brighter spotlight. This is not necessarily a bad thing as it keeps management accountable to investors.

LINN Energy is a different kind of oil and gas company. There is virtually no commodity price risk here; instead you're buying stable, growing cash flows. That stability does not come cheap: Investors can certainly pay less for an oil and gas investment, but in doing so they expose themselves to the underlying commodity. You need to ask yourself what you are buying and why. We're here to help you along the way, stay tuned to all this week for more coverage on LINN Energy, including its earnings release on Feb 21.

Like I said, LINN is not a cheap company but a stable cash flow. If on the other hand you're looking for a deeper discount and are okay with commodity price risk, then Chesapeake Energy might be right up your alley. Its share price depreciated after negative news surfaced concerning the company's management and spiraling debt picture. While these issues still persist, giant steps have been taken to help mitigate the problems. To learn more about Chesapeake and its enormous potential, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's brand new premium report on the company. Simply click here now to access your copy, and as an added bonus, you'll receive a full year of key updates and expert guidance as news continues to develop.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2013, at 10:57 AM, JustMee01 wrote:


    A good article that summarizes Linn's strategy well, but what do you think of the accounting treatment criticism on the puts? Are you concerned at all about their capitalization?

    Personally, I am not. I don't think it's a big issue, but some people clearly do.

    The other aspect is the "you're buying stable, growing cash flows" statement. We HAVE been buying stable, growing cash flows. Will we in the future?

    Linn's getting pretty big. It will be hard to reproduce those huge BP purchases. So, Linn's turned to whole companies. Berry Petroleum's roughly a quarter of Linn's size. It was a $4+ B acquisition. The next one will need to be even bigger. These are no longer little deals. At what point does Linn run out of deals to fill its voracious appetite?

    I do know that this one surprised me, and it came at a market premium. It has me curious how many other Berry Petroleums are out there, valued well below Linn's pricepoint. I just don't know and it would seem like a sensible thing to investigate. Are there plenty of Berry-like opportunities out there??? If there are, then Linn may still have room to grow.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2013, at 6:56 PM, TMFmd19 wrote:

    Hi JustMee01-

    Thanks for reading and great comments. I'm not really concerned about the accounting treatment. Linn was pretty open about it on the conference call and said that they would look for other ways to hedge if buying puts hurt the company's ability to access the capital market. That tells me that they are not using them improperly.

    To answer your other question, I think Berry is the tip of the iceberg. First we can put away the concern that paying a premium means they overpaid, BRY was $57+ a share within the past year. Not only that but the tax free implications created value for BRY which further reduced any perceived market premium.

    Looking forward, LINN sees its addressable market at nearly half a trillion dollars. There are public E&P's like BRY but also private ones and assets owned by institutions. Then there are the straight asset deals like the BP. So, really, I think they can grow for decades. Not only that but today's hot plays will be tomorrow's mature assets.

    So, I don't see too much holding them back at the moment. We need to keep an eye on the hedging and the debt but I think the distribution is safe and should grow for years given the reserves and ability to keep buying.


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2266702, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/28/2016 4:40:59 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,339.24 110.94 0.61%
S&P 500 2,171.37 11.44 0.53%
NASD 5,318.55 12.84 0.24%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/28/2016 3:59 PM
LINEQ $0.06 Up +0.00 +5.83%
Linn Energy, LLC CAPS Rating: **
LNCO.DL $0.05 Down +0.00 -3.88%
Linn Co, LLC CAPS Rating: ***
BBEPQ $0.06 Up +0.01 +10.52%
BreitBurn Energy P… CAPS Rating: ****
CHK $6.75 Up +0.52 +8.35%
Chesapeake Energy CAPS Rating: ***
RDS-A $48.72 Up +1.62 +3.44%
Royal Dutch Shell… CAPS Rating: ****