Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Should You Worry About This Tech Trend?

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

Silicon Valley's biggest names may be flush with cash, but owners -- i.e., shareholders -- aren't reaping huge dividends. Instead, Facebook (NASDAQ: FB  ) , Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) , and NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA  ) are joining Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) in expanding their corporate digs.

Google and NVIDIA last week went public with plans to expand their existing office space. Vanity Fair published an exclusive preview of the new Googleplex, which is to be designed by architecture firm NBBJ and occupy 1.1 million square feet.

NVIDIA, meanwhile, is planning to add a new reptilian-looking HQ across the street from its current Silicon Valley digs. In a blog post, co-founder Jen-Hsun Huang described the project as embodying the company's ambitions.

"The design harmonizes smart functionality and a shape that connects with and inspires our employees – a triangle, the fundamental building block of computer graphics," Huang wrote.

Sounds awesome, right? It must be if you're an employee of either of these companies. Or, for that matter, Facebook, which months ago revealed plans to build a decked-out new space for 3,400 engineers.

Less clear is whether these efforts are necessary steps to sustained growth or a severe case of Apple envy. Steve Jobs presented plans for the Mac maker's forthcoming HQ, which looks more like a spaceship than an office complex, at a Cupertino town hall meeting months before his untimely death.

Is this a troubling trend? A little, yes, but Silicon Valley is an intellectually driven economy, and top companies win by attracting and keeping the brightest minds in their fields. Appealing space can be a recruiting tool.

But I also wouldn't mind seeing these companies use some of their cash as a substitute for dilutive options grants that eat away at profits and cost shareholders gains. Do you agree? Disagree? Please share your thoughts in the comments box below.

And if you're interested in following Apple more closely, I urge you to take advantage of our newest premium research service. Motley Fool senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief Eric Bleeker will help you understand whether Apple is a buy right now and what opportunities are left for the company (and, more importantly, your portfolio) over the long term. Click here now to get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 24, 2013, at 10:19 PM, EconoWizDanny wrote:

    I am not entirely sure what you are suggesting? I do agree a reduction in their dilutive options/shares would be a good thing considering the majority of them posting a negative market trend over the last week. But, I don't know the particulars of the options well enough to know if they are even callable? Also, I don't associate the liquidity associated with a new HQ as representing a current capital investment with enough value to really effect the total amount of callable bonds outstanding. But, I haven't looked at the numbers so you may be right.

  • Report this Comment On February 25, 2013, at 5:22 PM, XXF wrote:

    The tech industry is awash in poor governance. There are too many director's seats held by insiders and under quid pro quo arrangement and the industry is dominated by individuals with egos that outsize their morals.

    How would you define the value of a company if not the present value of future dividends discounted at a risk-based rate of return? If tech companies refuse to return any of the money to their business' owners then the value of the company is zero.

    How many more times do we need to see tech companies whittle away under executive compensation and failed business lines before investors get loud enough to demand they return our cash? Of course it's hard to get that loud when most tech companies out there have dual class shares and poison pill amendments to prevent shareholders from demanding their rights.

    *Soapbox rant over*

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2273326, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/28/2016 8:25:12 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 11 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,228.30 133.47 0.74%
S&P 500 2,159.93 13.83 0.64%
NASD 5,305.71 48.22 0.92%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/27/2016 4:00 PM
GOOGL $810.73 Up +8.08 +1.01%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
NVDA $66.54 Up +2.20 +3.42%
Nvidia CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $113.09 Up +0.21 +0.19%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
FB $128.69 Up +1.38 +1.08%
Facebook CAPS Rating: ***