What Coal CEOs Are Saying Entering 2013

Coal has been beaten up in the media and the markets over the past year or so. Being outspoken against coal has been made easy by cheaper, cleaner-burning natural gas, which has been produced in abundance here in the United States recently. 

To tackle reductions in both demand and price, coal companies in the U.S. were forced to curtail production and capital spending in preparation for future production. Entering 2013, could the coal market finally have found a trough? To help answer that question, I turned to the conference calls of some of the biggest players in the business to see what their CEO's had to say.

The largest player in the business, Peabody Energy (NYSE: BTU  ) ,  has found itself operating in both the western U.S. and Australia, which has allowed it great access to the import markets of China and India. Record exports helped carry Peabody and its peers through 2012's dormant domestic market, but does Chairmen and CEO Greg Boyce see this continuing? 

We would expect a growing reliance on imports to help satisfy India's continued build-out to meet its energy needs. Japan and Europe also increased thermal coal imports in 2012, as coal continued to substitute for declining nuclear generation, and as international gas prices remain high. We expect to see burn thermal coal demand to grow in 2013 in excess of 40 million tons. We look for approximately 75-gigawatts of new coal-fueled generation to come online globally in 2013, which will require another 250 million tons annually at full capacity.

With positive sentiment remaining abroad for coal, what does he expect here in the U.S.? Will there be a shift or simply continuation of the status quo?

In 2013, we expect an improved supply/demand balance as stockpiles normalize, led by a 40 million to 60 million ton increase in US coal use. We expect US met and thermal coal exports to fall from 2012, due to current pricing in the seaborne market. Based on producer announcements and early trends we are seeing so far this year, we would expect US production to continue to decline in 2013.

In 2012, Alpha Natural Resources (NYSE: ANR  )  doubled its exports of eastern thermal coal as volumes reached 6 million tons shipped. This is an area that Chairman and CEO Kevin Crutchfield says the company feels confident about the its ability to expand. Further encouraging news, he says, will emerge from the realignment of the supply and demand dynamic.

Since bottoming with spot prices reported in the low $140's per metric ton late in the third quarter, the Asian market has strengthened as a result of reacceleration of Chinese manufacturing activity, steel restocking efforts, and record high Chinese coking coal imports in December ... And the current pricing is insufficient to sustain the large portion of the remaining global production base, these raise the odds that better times lie ahead. And those odds increase further if growing Asian economies start to consume a larger portion of a smaller natural supply base.

Investors simply cannot avoid monitoring the natural gas market when considering coal as a bullish investment. Arch Coal (NYSE: ACI  ) President and CEO John Eaves touched on this after discussing his 2012 performance. In his mind, the downward pressure low natural gas prices have been placing on coal could finally shed some weight.

[We] believe that natural gas prices are unsustainably low today, as companies cannot make sufficient returns to justify continued investment, as evidenced by the rig count decline. Over time we expect market forces to move gas prices higher, which should further bolster coal's competitiveness in the power sector. We also believe that US generators entered 2013 with conservative burn forecasts, and could potentially find themselves needing coal as the year progresses. This development should initially help to reduce the stockpile overhang, but could eventually lead to more active and dynamic market in the second half of the year and into 2014.

After reading these three outlooks, CONSOL Energy (NYSE: CNX  )  reels everyone's expectations a bit with Chairman and CEO J. Brett Harvey's skeptically confident forecast:

And remember, it's demand for energy. It's not the ability to serve the customer. The demand is just not there, and we think China's turning a little bit, and that looks pretty strong. As Jim talked about, our inventories there have dropped right inside of China, and we're optimistic. But it's a little bit dicey, yet. I wouldn't give a robust look, but I can tell you we're cautiously optimistic.

A fifth company, though much smaller than those mentioned here -- market capitalization of just $95 million -- is James River Coal (NASDAQOTH: JRCCQ  ) . Due to its limited scope it is potentially a riskier play on the rebound, but it releases earnings on March 7 for those interested on getting a smaller player's perspective.

Investing in cyclical industries like coal requires attention to the details that might signal the bottom of a downward cycle. These peaks and troughs are inherent, and that is something that investors must come to grips with. You can only hope that successive troughs are higher than those that came before it.

For those of use who have a penchant for long-term investing, getting in at, or as near as possible to, the bottom of these troughs is ideal. Based on these CEOs' appraisals of what the landscape looks like toward the horizon, we could have finally reached that point of inflection. Like Benjamin Franklin once said: "Kites rise highest against the wind."

Could Peabody Energy be your next investment kite?
The coal industry in the United States has been in a state of flux since the arrival of a cheaper alternative for energy production: natural gas. Exports are becoming a much bigger part of the domestic coal landscape, and Peabody Energy has deals in place to get its cheaper coal from the Powder River and Illinois basins to India, China, and the EU. For investors looking to capitalize on a rebound in the U.S. coal market, The Motley Fool has authored a special new premium report detailing exactly why Peabody Energy is perhaps most worthy of your consideration. Don't miss out on this invaluable resource -- simply click here now to claim your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 04, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Paulson545 wrote:

    Here's what your going to start reading about when the national news catches up with the local news. Gas well drillers are beginning to shut down operations. In my opinion they are probably going to reduce the supply of NatGas until the price exceeds $5.00. Last year the Wall Street Transcript wrote that NatGas was going to enter a five year up trend.

  • Report this Comment On March 04, 2013, at 10:47 AM, TMFrunAMuck wrote:

    @Paulson545 - Thanks for the comment.

    Which region's local news are you referring to? I definitely favor a more local look if you have a place you typically turn to, or if you are from a prominent production area.

  • Report this Comment On March 04, 2013, at 11:16 AM, MarkOfBeast wrote:

    BTU's estimate that they see global thermal coal demand growing 40M tons in 2013, is WAY TOO CONSERVATIVE that it is laughable. I expect a much bigger demand growth:

    1. China imported 290M tons of coal in 2012 versus 182M tons in 2012, that's 108M tons growth from China alone.

    2. China saved some coal demand due to excessive hydro-electricity in 2012. China generated 860.85 billion KWH of hydro-electricity in 2012, versus 694.04 billion. The 166.8 billion KWH of extra hydro-electricity saved China 91M tons worth of coal demand.

    3. If rainfall in China falls back to normal level, without any new coal demand growth, simply to replace the lost hydro-electricity, China would need to import 91M tons more coal, which already exceeds BTU's 40M demand growth figure.

    The most compelling case for being bullish in US coal, is that in the US shale gas sector, drilling rig has plummeted for over a year. The supply will finally collapse. More over, the shale gas industry has been funded by huge capital flow into the sector, as the industry spend $125B per year just to drill enough wells to maintain production. The shale gas production so far reached only 10 TCF per year, or worth $35B of revenue at current gas price. $35B shale gas reveue can not support or justify $125B capital spending to drill wells.

    The shale gas industry, already half a trillion dollar in debts, will collapse. That's going to send US coal sector flying.

  • Report this Comment On March 04, 2013, at 8:47 PM, devoish wrote:
  • Report this Comment On March 05, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Paulson545 wrote:

    Here are some random thoughts in no particular order. There are funds who announced they are looking to buy American mining companies. T Boone Pickens bought shares in Arch Coal & George Soros bought shares of Peabody Energy. Coal stocks are at record lows. China, Japan & India still need a lot of coal. NatGas is cheap but if you read newspapers from Eastern Ohio and Western Pa it seems as if Gas Drillers are reducing the number of wells they are drilling until prices improve. The Wall Street Transcript last year wrote that NatGas should start a five year move up in price. They are building NatGas plants to convert NatGas to a liquid to ship overseas. If demand out ways supply NatGas could and should spike up. Having said that coal is still out of favor but if people see their heating and electric bills start to move up they will vote for coal over NatGas in my opinion. Our other hope is that with coal stocks this cheap some of them get bought out. Let's hope the worst is over.

  • Report this Comment On March 05, 2013, at 11:47 AM, TMFrunAMuck wrote:

    "A kite rises against the wind." - Ben Franklin

    Is coal the contrarian choice at the moment?

    *disclosure - I own CNX (which I like for its exposure to both coal AND natural gas)

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2290820, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/23/2014 1:59:18 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement