Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.

Recs

4

2 Reasons Why Apple Was Back Below $400 Billion

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

The daily Street analyst drama surrounding Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) shares continues unabated. After a rebound rally yesterday to reclaim the $400 billion market cap threshold, shares woke up to selling pressure first thing in the morning. At the morning's low, the iPhone maker broke back below that $400 billion valuation by a hair.

There were two clear reasons for the investor pessimism in the form of analyst downgrades.

A first opinion
First came Berenberg, which downgraded its rating on Apple by two notches. What was previously a buy has gone straight to "sell" in Berenberg's opinion. Analyst Adnaan Ahmad believes that smartphone plays are no longer an attractive investment, following three years of healthy growth. Ahmad makes comparisons to what happened in the broader handset industry 10 years ago. In that case, unit volumes peaked in developed markets and companies subsequently found growth in emerging markets.

The challenge is that emerging markets represent lower-price segments of the market, which has the potential to squeeze margins due to the reduced pricing power. The analyst predicts that Apple's gross margins will fall from the 45% to 50% level down to roughly 35% over the next three years. Notably, Ahmad also cut his rating on Apple's archenemy Samsung.

He sees both companies peaking and future growth coming from margin-dilutive sources, which will contribute to fundamentals throughout the industry deteriorating. This effect will subsequently trickle down through the supply chain as OEMs look to preserve margins by reducing component costs.

Berenberg similarly has sell ratings on other smartphone component plays, including Imagination Technologies, Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM  ) , and Foxconn International, among others. Those three companies all happen to be Apple suppliers in some form or fashion. Apple licenses mobile GPU designs from Imagination, buys basebands from Qualcomm, and Foxconn does the assembling.

Surprisingly, Berenberg separately reiterated a buy rating on ARM Holdings (NASDAQ: ARMH  ) , another smartphone supply chain pick that also provides processor IP to Apple. This is notable because I've long questioned ARM's monetization and role in the value chain relative to some of its licensees like Qualcomm, who add more value in the supply chain. Qualcomm also just boosted its dividend and buybacks on the fundamental strength of its business.

ARM's valuation is a little frothy at the moment and I think it's gotten ahead of itself, even as it tapped a fresh 52-week high yesterday. If you compare the three, Qualcomm and Apple offer much more attractive valuations.

AAPL P/E Ratio TTM Chart

AAPL P/E Ratio TTM data by YCharts.

This is why it's peculiar to rate them both at "sell" while ARM earns a buy rating.

A second opinion
Citi also chimed in with negative news. The investment bank is keeping a neutral rating on Apple, but has toned down its price target from $500 to $480 after reducing its estimates on iPhone and iPad sales in the near term. The 9.7-inch iPad is seeing demand fall, which Citi believes is a result of tablet market share loss.

The analyst believes that Street estimates for iPhone unit sales over the next two quarters are too high. The consensus currently calls for 37 million and 32 million iPhone units over the next two quarters, respectively. Citi slightly reduced its estimate for the current quarter from 35 million to 34 million, while keeping its estimate of 25 million units next quarter. Both of those estimates are below consensus.

The challenge with these estimates is that the timing of Apple's product cycles is largely unknown right now. The iPad may see a refresh within months, but no one knows for sure. Likewise, the iPhone is expected to see an earlier launch this year (June or July) relative to last year (September). New product launches reinvigorate unit sales and if Apple announces a product launch, don't be surprised if all the Street analysts that have been ratcheting down estimates in recent months scramble to re-up them.

The most undervalued stock in the universe
Opinion isn't entirely negative on the Street, though. Goldman Sachs still considers Apple a buy and thinks shares are headed to $660. Goldman even noted that Apple is currently the most undervalued stock within its coverage universe, based on current prices and its price target. Of all of those stocks on its radar, Apple has the most potential upside based on its modeling.

Once upon a time, there was a cheery consensus on Apple's prospects. These days, there is anything but consensus and these analyst opinions are just more evidence that the stock has become a battleground.

Concerned about Apple's plunge? We have expert advice for you.
Emotions aside, Apple's growth story is far from over, and the company still has massive opportunities ahead. We've outlined them right here in The Motley Fool's premium Apple research service, and it may give you the courage to be greedy when others are fearful. If you're looking for some guidance on Apple's prospects, get started by clicking here.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 06, 2013, at 8:50 PM, DanManners wrote:

    Evan, I love your articles. Great stuff.

  • Report this Comment On March 06, 2013, at 8:58 PM, DanManners wrote:

    Evan, I have a few questions and it would be an honor to get your opinion.

    I agree with you most of the time.

    1. Will the Galaxy 4 (assuming it is a great update) offset and buybacks or dividend increase that are announced this month (if they are announced)???

    2. Everyone thought Apple employees were so great but Scott Forstall and the maps fiasco, Ron Johnson and his problems running JC Penney and Tim Cook having no innovation and a stock price that is down 40% has changed that. What do you think?

    3. I think Apple should go after Googles' business. Buy Bidu and control search in China a much bigger market where Google is not really succeeding.

  • Report this Comment On March 06, 2013, at 10:27 PM, PEStudent wrote:

    For a couple years now, I've been saying that when you're Apple's size, making a percent improvement in sales or earnings requires an ever bigger new product success. When your profit margin is so large to start with, it magnifies any stumbling on the way. Yes, Apple should be expected to produce some new "wows" but that doesn't mean that will grow earnings much anymore in a field where last year's product is out of date yet, as happened with computers, we're not far from the date when mobile items become virtual commodities. It's a great company but not as certain a great stock anymore.

  • Report this Comment On March 06, 2013, at 10:43 PM, TMFNewCow wrote:

    DanManners,

    1) I don't believe I understand the first question, mind rephrasing? If you're comparing the Galaxy S IV launch on 3/14 to a dividend/repurchase increase in the near future for Apple, I think the positive effects of a dividend/repurchase increase would outweigh any negative sentiment surrounding the competitve GS IV launch.

    2) Forstall reportedly clashed with other execs frequently, and the maps issue was more of an overreaction from the press since it didn't actually affect sales and iOS emerged stronger because of it (after Google Maps relaunched as a 3rd party app). Ron Johnson's troubles at JCP seem to be isolated to JCP, even though he was a huge part of Apple's retail success. I also don't believe that all of Apple's product innovation needs now fall solely on Cook, instead innovation is deeply embedded within the corporate culture so the entire company can contribute.

    3) Apple would never get directly into search. Too far off from what it's good at. Apple doesn't buy it's way into large businesses with huge acquisitions either. It makes small specialized purchases with technology it can integrate into existing products.

    Hope that helps!

    -- Evan

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 2296734, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/19/2013 7:34:20 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,354.40 121.18 0.80%
S&P 500 1,667.47 17.00 1.03%
NASD 3,498.97 33.73 0.97%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/17/2013 4:00 PM
AAPL $433.26 Down -1.32 -0.30%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
QCOM $66.61 Up +0.97 +1.48%
Qualcomm CAPS Rating: *****
GS $158.18 Up +3.71 +2.40%
Goldman Sachs CAPS Rating: ***
ARMH $49.78 Down -0.11 -0.22%
ARM Holdings CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement