Is the Financial System Safer Today Than It Was in 2007?

It's been more than four years since Wall Street collapsed. What's happened since then?

Banks have raised tens of billions of dollars in capital. They're less leveraged and have more liquidity than before.

Consumers have far less debt. Total debt-to-GDP has been declining for four years. 

New regulations dictate what should happen if a huge bank faces collapse, ostensibly ending bailouts (in theory, anyway).

We've made big strides in the right direction. But so much can still go wrong, and so much still is wrong. Is the financial system actually safer than it was five years ago?

I recently asked that question to former AIG (NYSE: AIG  ) CEO Hank Greenberg. Here's what he had to say (transcript follows):

Morgan Housel: Do you think the global financial system is safer today than it was in 2007?

Hank Greenberg: It's now so tight you can't do anything.

Morgan Housel: That's an interesting point of view. It might be as dangerous, but there's not much we can do about it?

Hank Greenberg: I think that, if you look at the regulators that we have, and had at the time, how did all this start in housing? It started with the government.

When our governor was the head of HUD, they loosened the reins. The decision by the administration was, "We want more Americans to own their homes." They dropped the qualifications for getting mortgages, and people who couldn't afford a home got a home.

Morgan Housel: The mortgages are being purchased by Fannie and Freddie, right?

Hank Greenberg: Yeah.

Morgan Housel: But a tremendous amount, virtually all of the subprime that was being done in 2005-06 was all in the private market, correct?

Hank Greenberg: Yeah.

Morgan Housel: It wasn't until 2007 that Fannie and Freddie started getting into subprime.

Hank Greenberg: No, I understand that. I understand that, but they fed on it. Once you start down that road, it became a little easier next time, to the next one, the next one, and the next one.

Then you go beyond that. The SEC, where were they when the investment banks were leveraging the capital 40 to 1? Did you hear anybody say anything?

The blame is widespread. I think if you look at some other countries -- a city-state like Singapore -- a tiny state, but very well run, and the regulators are terrific. They get paid as much as they would if they were in the private sector, or maybe more. They're intelligent, smart.

We need to change the dynamics here in the regulatory structure.

For more on AIG
At the end of last year, AIG was the favorite stock among hedge fund managers. Have they identified the next big multi-bagger, or are the risks facing the insurance giant still too great? In The Motley Fool's premium report on AIG, Financials Bureau Chief Matt Koppenheffer breaks down the key issues that you need to know about if you want to successfully invest in this stock. Simply click here now to claim your copy, and you'll also receive a full year of key updates and expert analysis as news continues to develop.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 14, 2013, at 3:15 PM, BigFatBEAR wrote:

    Greenberg just more DOUBLED his suit against the US from seeking $25 billion to $55 billion. This after we the taxpayers helped AIG out, against most of our wills, in their time of need. Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn about what he says! He has a lot of apologizing to do before he finally does us all a favor and pays some estate tax upon death.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2311166, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/23/2014 7:21:48 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement