5 Reasons You Should Stop Obsessing Over the Dow

Millions of Americans never look beyond the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  ) in thinking about the stock market. With all the news that its streak of eight consecutive all-time record-high closes generated over the past two weeks, the Dow has only cemented its status as the center of attention for mainstream investors and market observers.

Yet what most of those people don't know is that the Dow has largely become irrelevant as a true measure of the market's health. Despite the Dow's more than 100-year history, it gets far more attention than it deserves, overshadowing other market measures that carry more useful information about stocks and their financial health. Let's look at five reasons you should stop paying so much attention to the Dow.

Reason 1: The Dow has only 30 stocks.
In a market with thousands of different companies covering the widest swath of industries, company sizes, and geographic areas, the Dow has room for only 30 of them. The folks who manage the Dow do their best to pick the most deserving candidates, but with such a limited number of spots available -- as well as a tendency not to want to make changes unless it becomes absolutely necessary -- the Dow's ability to stay relevant comes under assault all the time.

Reason 2: Out of the Dow's 30 stocks, only a few really matter.
Because of the way the Dow is calculated, only the stocks with the highest share prices really have a big influence on the overall average. Consider: IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) shares are worth 17 times what a share of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) costs. As a result, when you look at the gain of about 7% that IBM has enjoyed so far in March, IBM has contributed more to the total number of points that the overall Dow has risen than Bank of America throughout its rise of more than 150% from December 2011 through yesterday. Put another way, a 1% move in IBM moves the Dow by more than 16 points, while the same 1% move in B of A has less than a 1-point impact on the Dow.

Reason 3: The Dow leaves out essential companies.
Have you ever wondered why Apple and Google are left out of the Dow? Apple has the largest market cap in the U.S. market, yet most experts agree that the company will never get into the Dow unless it takes the step of splitting its shares. The reason: With a stock price above $400 per share, Apple would have twice the importance even of IBM, dominating the Dow. For its part, Google would have still more weight, with its $800 share price giving it about a third of the overall influence in the Dow.

You can also make similar arguments about corporate leaders in industries that get left out of the Dow. For instance, since the ejection of General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) , the Dow hasn't had an automaker among its ranks, despite the clear importance of the auto industry to the overall economy. Such omissions threaten the Dow's relevance and credibility.

Reason 4: The Dow has bad timing when its managers make changes.
The Dow doesn't make many changes, but when it does, it has had some terrible timing. Among some of the worst examples were the decision to wait until after the financial crisis to replace Citigroup and GM, with GM on the brink of bankruptcy when it was replaced in June 2009. Similarly, AIG (NYSE: AIG  ) didn't get replaced until September 2008, after it had already suffered huge losses in advance of its needing a massive federal bailout. On the other hand, the additions of Microsoft and Intel in November 1999 corresponded almost perfectly with the high-water mark of the tech boom, with both companies suffering severe losses in the ensuing bear market.

Reason 5: The Dow leaves out international companies.
The Dow includes only U.S. companies. That made sense when the U.S. was the dominant capitalist economic power in the world, but with up-and-coming international markets catching up to the U.S., the Dow can no longer claim to track well with stock markets around the world. Although many of those companies have businesses with global scope, many foreign companies are world leaders in their industries, leaving the corresponding Dow component in that industry as an also-ran at best.

Go beyond the Dow
The Dow is a perfectly reasonable way to measure how some of the top companies in the U.S. are performing in the stock market. But as a reflection of the entire stock market, it falls woefully short. That's why you shouldn't obsess over the Dow's every move, instead taking a big-picture perspective on the broader market.

Bank of America's big run may not have had much impact on the Dow, but investors were undoubtedly happy about the rebound. But are there more gains yet to come? Find out whether B of A is just getting started by reading The Motley Fool's premium research report on the bank. Inside, Fool banking experts Matt Koppenheffer and Anand Chokkavelu, CFA, explain the bank's operations in vivid detail, with three reasons to buy and three reasons to sell. Click here now to claim your copy.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 1:31 PM, yourbestfriend wrote:

    How hard would it be to point out that the S&P and the Nasdaq index are also inefficient indicators of the overall market's value, being cherrypicked collections of high-market-cap winners, and that nobody anywhere reports the total value of all marketable equities, and that it's some sort of financial-industry scam to induce retail investors to churn their accounts based on rosy data?

    Wall Street made up all of those metrics as a con, not to keep investors informed.

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 4:01 PM, jewnomics101 wrote:

    6th Reason

    Its all fictitious. The whole thing. Been that way since 1913.

  • Report this Comment On March 18, 2013, at 1:57 PM, TheRealRacc wrote:

    AAPL in an index? Are you mad? Could not find a stock that less represents any aspect of any economy.

  • Report this Comment On March 18, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Chontichajim wrote:

    The "Wilshire 5000" is a comprehensive (not total) index of American stocks of all cap groups and industries. There are days when all 3 major indexes go one way and the Wilshire still goes the other, but not very often.

  • Report this Comment On March 19, 2013, at 3:57 AM, Mathman6577 wrote:

    The Dow being composed of only American companies shouldn't be a consideration of irrelevance as an index of the "American" market, should it ? Most American investors do not think about the German or Japanese stock markets on a regular basis, do they ?

    And I continue to love all the Apple bashing comments that I read online on a regular basis.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2316730, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 1:52:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement