Will Soaring Ethanol Credits Cost You at the Pump?

Refiners have crushed the market in the past two years, thanks to a favorable margin in crude oil benchmarks, and look to continue their upward trajectory in 2013. However, an unfolding development surrounding the federal ethanol mandate has refining companies going toe-to-toe with ethanol producers and the EPA. The value of ethanol credits known as renewable identification numbers, or RINs, has grown more than 1,000% since December.

Executives at some of the nation's largest refiners have seized the opportunity to publicly deride the mandates, with CEO Jack Lipinski of CVR Energy (NYSE: CVI  ) saying the "unintended consequences are frightening." Some have called for the mandate to be reduced in 2013, arguing that it now threatens profit margins for refiners and retail gasoline prices for consumers. 

Will the rising values end up costing you the next time you fill up the tank? Who's to blame? The answer isn't as clear-cut as it seems.

The RIN market
Ethanol producers assign RINs to blocks of ethanol -- usually between 1 million and 5 million gallons -- which are then sold to blenders alongside the physical product. For example, if ethanol sells for $2.00 per gallon and RINs are valued at $0.50 per gallon, the blender must pay a total of $2.50 per gallon of ethanol. The market system was designed in 2005 with the Renewable Fuel Standard, or RFS, to accomplish two things: (1) to provide an added incentive for renewable fuel production, and (2) to keep track of the volumes of biofuels that refiners blended into the nation's gasoline.

Source: EIA.

Since it was implemented, the market for RINs has worked as intended in a supply-and-demand relationship. In the early years of the industry, RINs produced a sizable chunk of sales for biorefineries. Credits fell precipitously as the industry matured and ethanol production soared, pushing weaker producers out and leaving only the most efficient standing. Nonetheless, the mandate did its job to spur the American ethanol industry.

Hitting a wall
Which brings us to the issue at hand: From early 2010 to the end of 2012, ethanol credits never broke $0.10 per gallon. Something changed a few weeks ago, as secondary RINs were trading hands for $0.75 per gallon:

What's behind it all? The long-term problem facing the industry has little to do with RIN values and everything to do with the dreaded blend wall -- the limit of how much ethanol can be blended into a gallon of gasoline. Refiners have maintained that the blend wall will be reached at 10% ethanol mixtures, or E10, while the EPA has stated that it's E15 for cars built after 2001. Who's right?

Although blenders cite car manufacturers as the de facto source for their concerns, several studies suggest that E10 isn't really where the blend wall begins. A study released last year showed the potential benefit of using higher ethanol blends in terms of octane ratings for E15 to E30 fuels. The report states: "Higher octane ratings would enable greater thermal efficiency in future engines through higher compression ratio (CR) and/or more aggressive turbocharging and downsizing, and in current engines on the road today through more aggressive spark timing under some driving conditions."

It goes on to conclude that "substantial societal benefits may be associated with capitalizing on the inherent high-octane rating of ethanol in future higher-octane number ethanol-gasoline blends."

Who wrote the study? A little-known group called Ford (NYSE: F  ) .

Blenders have a point
You can't blame refiners for attempting to defend their turf. Raising the mandated ethanol blend from E10 to E15 displaces an additional 5% of gasoline from the market and results in a loss of market share. And to be fair, they do have a point in their scuffle with the EPA. The agency's unwillingness to break from its original fuel guidelines in light of changing market forces is worrisome. For instance, RFS calls for nearly 1 billion gallons of cellulosic ethanol in 2013 despite the country's lack of capacity.

The bigger problem is the ever-increasing mandates for ethanol in the face of falling gasoline consumption. The mandates push the effective ethanol blend in the nation's gasoline tantalizingly close to the E10 blend wall:

Year

Finished Gasoline Sold (Billion Gallons)

Fuel Ethanol Sold (Billion Gallons)

Approximate Blend Ratio

2005

140.411

4.040

2.88%

2006

141.841

5.615

3.96%

2007

142.349

6.960

4.89%

2008

138.182

9.838

7.12%

2009

137.917

11.136

8.07%

2010

137.900

12.915

9.37%

2011

133.940

12.90

9.63%

2012

?

13.018

?

Source: EIA.
Note: Fuel ethanol sold equals production less net imports.  

Given the 15 billion-gallon cap on corn ethanol in RFS and a rough target of 10% ethanol blends, we can assume that the agency figured ethanol production would top off when gasoline consumption hit 150 billion gallons. Oops.

This is the root of the problem. Refiners such as Valero (NYSE: VLO  ) and Marathon Petroleum  (NYSE: MPC  ) are making a short-term push to buy RINs on the secondary market -- without equivalent volumes of ethanol -- to combat the blend wall. Doing this allows blenders to have enough credits to meet their renewable-fuel requirements without exceeding 10% blends.

What's the rush? In April, the EPA is expected to announce the 2013 ethanol mandate calling for 14 billion gallons of corn ethanol. Continually increasing engine efficiency could lower total gasoline consumption to around 130 billion gallons for the year, resulting in a national ethanol blend just above the line refiners have drawn in the sand. 

Foolish bottom line
Will rising RIN values affect gasoline prices? Assuming the credits remain at current prices of $0.70 per gallon and a 10% ethanol blend for 2013, RINs will add $0.07 to a gallon of gasoline. Consider that gasoline prices last week were $0.12 below last year's prices. Therefore, it seems unlikely that ethanol will make a major impact on your budget.

As for the larger problem at hand, I find it difficult to show compassion for refiners complaining about skyrocketing RIN prices when they're the ones buying certificates on the open market. Furthermore, refiners can increase exports of non-blended gasoline to countries that don't have ethanol mandates, so it may actually increase margins even further.

That doesn't mean the EPA gets off the hook. The agency urgently needs to address its plans for the future of renewable fuels. When 2022 rolls around, it will be impossible to blend the required 31 billion gallons of ethanol (16 billion gallons of cellulosic) into our fuel. The market needs to be reassured by the EPA and car manufacturers such as Ford that the country's infrastructure and automobile engines can handle higher blends of ethanol without significant modifications (where possible). Many see E15 blends as an inevitable reality in the next several years, but that won't solve the problems we'll face in 2022. And it's much closer than you think.

Ford has more power in the future of the ethanol industry than many people think, which will be aided by the increased financial flexibility it's earned by paying down its debt. The stock has recently taken off, and it appears that investors have begun to notice what Ford is doing right. Does this create an incredible buying opportunity, or are there hidden risks with the stock that investors need to know about? For in-depth analysis on whether Ford is a buy right now, and why, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's premium research report on the company, authored by one of our top equity analysts. Simply click here now to claim your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 10:38 AM, image7 wrote:

    When is American going to wake up about the HEMP plant? You can make bio-fuel from this plant. You can make over 25,000+ products and medicines . The Federal gov't needs to take it off the schedule one drug list. I support H.R. 499 (2013) (take marijuana off the schedule one list)

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 3:28 PM, murphinator1 wrote:

    every state should have e85 available to those who want it that would solve this problem , or at least mandate every station have a blender pump where you can choose any ratio of ethanol to gasoline you want , I have to drive 2 states away to get e85 to run in my toys , search e85 on you tube to see how amazing this fuel can be all the quckest cars run it , makes more power than $12 a gallon race fuel for $3 a gallon. Like the article said for fuel economy they can make smaller more efficient engines with higher compression and or turbos to more than make up for smaller displacements - The hot rodders are onto ethanol fuels because they flat out work !

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 7:28 PM, hwneys wrote:

    Hawaii has used e10 blend for a long time and most people don't know what it really does. Powers that be want you to believe that it is the wonder blend of all times, but it is not. It has been shown that ethinol in gas or not is bad for the rubber hoses or plastic parts in a cars engine, that includes boats, lawn mowers, weed wackers and generators. A garage owner here tested ethinol and found that it will melt plastic and turn rubber gummy to the point were engines would not run until their carbs, injectors and some gas lines were cleaned, rebuilt or replaced to get the engine running again. Boat owners here will not run ethinol blended fuels in their boats for fear of break downs out at sea.

    The government and fuel industries must do more research on corn based ethinol, before requiring it to be use in all gasoline products.

    Sugar based ethinol would be cheaper to produce since it is the by product of making sugar which would be thrown out anyway or turned into some alcohol based products unlike corn being turned into animal feed....

  • Report this Comment On March 16, 2013, at 7:32 PM, hwneys wrote:

    Opps, misspelt ethanol each and every time in my post!!!! Sorry folks....

  • Report this Comment On March 18, 2013, at 11:50 AM, CopyCat3000 wrote:

    I cannot agree with those who still think we can use food for fuel. With world population exploding to 9 billion in just a few years this is simply short sighted. Fools in this article, like so many, seem to be afraid to call a spade a spade so I will. The problem is GOVERNMENT poking its nose where it doesn't belong. As long as we allow this stupidity to propagate we will continue down a path that is unsustainable.

  • Report this Comment On March 20, 2013, at 9:44 PM, EmFetch267 wrote:
  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2013, at 12:48 PM, TMFBlacknGold wrote:

    @EmFetch267

    Not so sure the calculation in the link above is accurate. I believe the coverage would be multiplied as 1.13, not 0.13.

    For instance, if one were to use the equation presented in the link in a year when the amount of ethanol produced met demand the cost added to gasoline would zero (multiplied by 0). That makes absolutely no sense.

    I think the industry will produce close to 14 billion gallons this year given recent upgrades by POET and others.

    --Maxxwell

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2316704, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/30/2014 10:34:24 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement