Is Shell Making a Sequel to "Waterworld"?

It's not every day that a company writes a check for $15 billion in an effort to save money. That's a pretty astronomical number, but it does represent the cheaper option for several companies looking to tap offshore gas fields for liquefied natural gas, or LNG, production. Laying underwater pipelines for hundreds of miles can be expensive, especially when the gas and condensate contains large amounts of seawater and sediment. This heavily skews the economic competitiveness of large offshore reserves around the world to the "noncompetitive" category.

Why bring the gas to the liquefaction facility when you can bring the facility to the gas?

Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A  ) aims to get around the high costs of developing offshore gas fields by building a floating liquid natural gas, or FLNG, facility. This is not a fanciful idea by a large multinational company with too much time on its hands: Construction has already begun on the $12.6 billion Prelude FLNG facility. It could mean big things for the future of natural gas.

All ideas start off as crazy
Shell's Prelude FLNG facility (67.5% interest) will be the world's largest, producing 3.6 million metric tons (mtpa) of LNG, 1.3 mtpa of condensate, and 0.4 mtpa of liquid petroleum gas each year. If building a massive floating facility sounds ridiculous, that's because it is. And how massive is massive? Try 488 meters long. That's about 50% longer than a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier (the world's largest), more than four times longer than a soccer field, the same size as the Taipei 101 Tower, and just plain ginormous. The floating giant will displace the same amount of water at six Nimitz-class aircraft carriers. Yet despite its massive size, Prelude will have just 25% of the footprint of a similar-sized onshore facility.  

The capacity will represent only about one-third the capacity of the Sabine Pass facility being constructed by Cheniere Energy (NYSEMKT: LNG  ) and Total (NYSE: TOT  ) . However, this should not be looked at through a lens that focuses solely on capacity. Prelude is writing an important chapter in world energy supply -- the kind that isn't factored into long-term energy predictions. As we'll see, the facility can be useful long after the gas field becomes uneconomical.

Source: Royal Dutch Shell.

Prelude FLNG will be moored about 200 kilometers off the northwestern coast of Australia and will open up a steady supply of gas to the high-priced Asian markets. The facility won't have to be brought back to port for inspection for 25 years -- not even during the strongest typhoons imaginable (famous last words).

How it works
The FLNG facility will float 250 meters above its target gas field, extract the riches from beneath the sea floor, clean and process the natural gas into LNG and other liquids, store them in the massive tanks located under its deck, and then offload the booty to LNG carriers that come cruising on by. Engineers have created a system that uses cold water from the ocean floor -- at the rate of 50 million liters per hour -- to help cool the LNG tanks. Ocean water is nowhere near the -162 Celsius needed to liquefy natural gas, but it will save millions of dollars and valuable deck space while protecting the facility's cargo from ambient temperatures.

Green LNG
This engineering marvel will eliminate hundreds of miles of pipelines and alleviate traffic in some of Australia's busiest ports. It also keeps traffic away from Australia's Great Barrier Reef, which adds more than $6.4 billion to the country's GDP each year. Decades from the now, when the gas field is depleted or no longer economical, the ship can float over to the next big offshore opportunity. It could also mine smaller reserves that are not economically recoverable by other means, perhaps including valuable methane hydrate deposits.  

An industry shift?
While a handful of multinational companies such as Gazprom and Petronas are planning or building their own FLNG facilities, several high-profile projects opted out at the last minute. Chevron (NYSE: CVS  ) , ExxonMobil  (NYSE: XOM  ) , and Shell were initially considering floating facilities for their massive Gorgon and Wheatstone projects but ultimately decided against it. However, the fields are so massive -- expected to triple Australia's LNG capacity -- that there will be plenty of opportunities for future FLNG capacity. That's especially true given Shell's presence, which was responsible for nudging the group toward FLNG in the first place.

INPEX and minority partner Total are building a hybrid FLNG facility for its Browse Basin project. The facility will extract and clean natural gas offshore before shipping it 885 kilometers to an onshore processing facility. Condensate and other liquids will be available for offloading to carriers offshore. Browse will have twice the capacity of Prelude, but will cost 2.7 times as much to build. With a final price tag of $34 billion, perhaps Shell is onto something.   

Foolish bottom line
Although it seems unlikely that all offshore gas deposits will be developed by FLNG facilities in the future, innovations from Shell will ensure that costly onshore facilities aren't the only option on the table. Not only does Prelude represent a discount to a similarly sized onshore facility, but its lifetime can also be extended well beyond that of the initial gas field. That could be a major selling point for companies with large offshore reserves scattered across the globe and give Shell the upper hand in partnering with new projects. This could be as big of a game-changer for the company -- and investors -- as it is for the industry.

If you're on the lookout for high-yielding stocks, The Motley Fool has compiled a special free report outlining our nine top dependable dividend-paying stocks. It's called "Secure Your Future With 9 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." You can access your copy today at no cost! Just click here.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 02, 2013, at 12:00 AM, hand1bag wrote:

    Hi!

    The errors in this piece are so enormous as to question both the author's credibility and his understanding of the information he alludes to.

    About the only information which is correct is that Prelude is the first FLNG project in the world applying Shell's world-leading technology.

    The technology was not available for Gorgon and Wheatstone and the size of INPEX's gas resource is larger than has been regarded as suitable for FLNG up until now. (The same might be said of both Gorgon and Wheatstone).

    By the way the Ichthys Project will clean up the gas offshore and send it onshore for processing into LNG. The offshore Central Processing Facilty will strip condesate (light oil) from the gas stream which will be marketed direct from the field. It is technically difficult and energy expensive to compress a liquid. That is why the Ichthys solution is one that has been used many times around the world. Ichthys is not a hybrid LNG project - it is totally conventional.

    INPEX is an equity partner in Prelude.

  • Report this Comment On April 02, 2013, at 8:53 AM, caztx wrote:

    In an attempt to be humorous, the author has mislead the readership in the general LNG industry as well as advances in offshore technology. It's obvious the research was only based on internet searches.

  • Report this Comment On April 02, 2013, at 11:54 AM, TMFBlacknGold wrote:

    @hand1bag,

    "The technology was not available for Gorgon and Wheatstone and the size of INPEX's gas resource is larger than has been regarded as suitable for FLNG up until now."

    In 2010 and even 2011 there was chatter that Chevron was considering FLNG for at least some of its fields. These fields are still being developed, so saying the technology was not available is a bit of a misnomer.

    "By the way the Ichthys Project..."

    You essentially paraphrased what I wrote above. Did you read the article?

    --Maxxwell

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2338299, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/30/2014 5:43:07 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement