Will Regulators Squelch Mortgage REITs' Juicy Yields?

For yield-starved investors, the plethora of mortgage REITs going public over the past few years has been a godsend. As fans of the sector well know, the requirement that these trusts share 90% of their profits with investors usually results in yields in the double digits. Even Annaly Capital (NYSE: NLY  ) , which has had to shrink its dividend because of the policies of the Federal Reserve, still sports a yield over 11%.

The mREIT explosion has drawn the attention of regulators, though, and talk of squelching these superlative returns by imposing limitations on the way these companies do business has begun to pick up, after several months of silence.

Expanding assets prompt concern
As mREITs rack up a larger asset base, some rule makers began to express concern that one or more failures in this sector could harm the mortgage industry -- or, more troubling, the economy at large. In August 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced it would be looking into regulating mREITs as if they were investment firms, much like mutual funds. This followed a tough time for these REITs, in which concerns regarding Europe caused selling that sent values plummeting.

Since then, things have been quieter on that front, but a recent Bloomberg article shows that regulators have recently restarted the debate. Of particular concern are the two largest mREITs, Annaly and American Capital Agency (NASDAQ: AGNC  ) . Together, these two companies hold approximately $234 billion in assets -- primarily government-insured mortgage-backed securities.

What's the risk?
In addition to their exploding girth, some officials worry about the high leverage these trusts use to make money as well as their use of repurchase agreements, since this was the formula that helped cause the financial crisis. As entities that invest in real estate, mREITs have been exempt from certain rules. If mREITs are folded into the category of investment funds, however, they will fall under the auspices of the Investment Act of 1940 -- effectively quashing their ability to use high leverage to produce their historic yields.

Will recent comments about mREIT risks from Fed Governor Jeremy Stein or Federal Reserve Bank of New York President William Dudley nudge the SEC to take action? Perhaps not. As some analysts point out, the industry is still tiny, holding less than 10% of all MBS products. In addition, most report lower leverage ratios today than they used in 2008.

Many commenters also note how important management is in this business, seeing little risk in the leadership of Annaly and American Capital Agency. One mREIT that seems to inspire less faith is Armour Residential (NYSE: ARR  ) . This company holds less than $21 billion in assets, but it has seen its asset base skyrocket by nearly 30% year over year, and some question the ability of management to keep up.

Are the sector's tasty yields soon to be a thing of the past? For mREIT investors, this may well be the most important issue facing the industry this year.

There's no question Annaly Capital's double-digit dividend is eye-catching. But can investors count on that payout sticking around? With the Federal Reserve keeping interest rates at historically low levels, Annaly has had to scramble to defend its bottom line. In The Motley Fool's premium research report on Annaly, senior analysts Ilan Moscovitz and Matt Koppenheffer uncover the key challenges the company faces and divulge three reasons investors may consider buying it. Simply click here now to claim your copy today!


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2013, at 3:20 PM, collinsfriedel1 wrote:

    If the gov't is truely concerned about protecting the american economy, they shold break up the big banks in the same way the big oil, steel & electric trusts were broken up a hundred yrs ago.

    Until Congressmen stops taking the banker's bribes, jokingly called election contributions, they have no credability with the american people.

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2013, at 5:47 PM, neamakri wrote:

    Together, these two companies hold approximately $234,000 in assets.

    What?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2339562, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/1/2014 12:38:53 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement