Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Will This Tiny Technology Mean the End of China's Manufacturing Dominance?

In the 1970s, PARC, a Xerox (NYSE: XRX  ) company (formerly the Palo Alto Research Center), helped usher in an era of modern computing, as it built a graphical mouse-based operating system atop the foundations laid by Douglas Englebart's NLS. The PARC Alto would inspire both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates to develop the earliest consumer graphical operating systems, which continue to influence interface design today.

In the 2010s, PARC might again transform the world through technology. This time, the big step forward is "chiplets," a minuscule form of printed electronic circuitry that can be created with modified laser printers, another PARC innovation from the 1970s. Each little chiplet is no larger than a grain of sand:

Source: PARC.

A New York Times feature published earlier this week highlights the potential this advance has in the field of printed flexible electronics, which PARC estimates will explode from a $1 billion global industry today to one worth $45 billion by 2016. Some possible applications:

  • Flexible and nearly unbreakable smartphones
  • Pressure-sensitive robotic skin
  • Sensor-enabled electronic (but disposable) medical bandages
  • Large digital screens you can roll up, fold, and put in your pocket
  • Low-cost durable circuit boards for a wide range of uses

These are just some of the ways in which printed circuitry might be used. As The New York Times feature points out, PARC's development represents a radical departure from the current chip-making model, in which a large wafer of silicon is processed, cut up into individual chips, and then reassembled into the various parts of a circuit board. Times writer John Markoff says: "The emerging printing technology poses a heretical idea: Rather than squeezing more transistors into the same small space, why not smear the transistors across a much larger surface?" The PARC laser-printing format (it's not exactly a laser printer, but it's quite similar) proposes to place sand-sized chiplets by the thousands onto the surface of flexible substrates, and these chiplets can be assembled to perform any of the diverse jobs undertaken in today's dizzying array of electronics by an increasingly specialized array of components.

The opportunity to upend chip-making is clear. Where does manufacturing come in?

Source: Stratasys on Flickr.

This is a 3-D printer, one of the largest Stratasys (NASDAQ: SSYS  ) models available. It can print just about anything you can think of (within the limits of its print area), including a scale-model Aston Martin. One thing it can't do -- the single most important thing it can't do -- is print electronic circuitry. It's not designed for that.

Stratasys could print a plastic-based robot with articulated joints. Other printers, particularly the largest variants from 3D Systems (NYSE: DDD  ) and most of ExOne's (NASDAQ: XONE  ) small product line, can print in metal, rubber, ceramic, and an increasingly diverse range of materials -- enough variety to create a functional robot. These companies may not even be necessary, as iRobot (NASDAQ: IRBT  ) recently filed a patent for a self-assembling 3-D printing robot manufacturing machine. All of these companies present some sort of opportunity to create a 3-D printed robot, but none of them can provide the brains. That's where Xerox's chiplets come in.

The greatest obstacle to 3-D printing's takeover of the manufacturing process (besides its slow pace of operation and difficulty in cost-efficiently scaling to mass production) is the fact that there's been no easy way to produce electronics. You can't print out a smartphone, because all the important components will still need to be plugged in. You can't print out a Kindle, or a new router, or a Roomba, or what have you. All you could ever print was the external casing, and that means nothing without circuitry to make things work. The need for external components won't be eliminated (you'd still need batteries, for example), but by enabling users of 3-D printers to create the circuitry for their custom devices, PARC could open up a whole new wave of manufacturing.

Manufacturing processes today take a number of diverse components and place them together just so to make a functional device. iRobot has hit on the next logical step -- 3-D printed devices with completely automated assembly -- but it still needs circuitry. A PARC chiplet printer installed next to a 3-D printer, with the requisite automation technologies, could finally make 3-D printing a viable manufacturing format for complex electronics. Since nearly everything we use now comes with some kind of embedded circuitry, the inability to replicate the electronic functionality of mass-manufactured goods in a 3-D printer would have remained a stumbling block even after the speed issue might be solved. Now, it's speed that remains the primary obstacle. Circuitry is within reach.

This is one step closer to my dream for 2025: distributed, small-scale, on-demand manufacturing. The 3-D printer simply doesn't make sense as the next laser printer. It's far more complex and requires far more technical expertise, and its output is less readily useful in entry-level consumer machines. However, when manufacturing becomes easier to do in high-tech automated warehouses stuffed with top-notch 3-D printers than it is in massive factories, the shift will be on. We've got a few years before that prediction's set to come true, and PARC has already pushed it in the right direction. Let's see if the 3-D printing companies can solve the speed problem in the meantime.

With the U.S. relying on the rest of the world for such a large percentage of our goods, many investors are ready for the end of the "made in China" era. Well, it may be here. Read all about the biggest industry disrupters since the personal computer in "3 Stocks to Own for the New Industrial Revolution." Just click here to learn more.

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (29)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2013, at 6:08 PM, chris293 wrote:

    IRBT has a the old problem, 'I believe it, when I see it', anyway with PARC estimates the whole 3D printing systems along with robots making robots are world changers. We already have robots working for a large number of manufacturing and service companies. The cheap wages of other counties or the high costs of workers in the U.S. causes many problems here for full employment

    to have any chance.

  • Report this Comment On April 11, 2013, at 8:48 PM, awallejr wrote:

    This could explain why Xerox finally has been making a decent move to the upside. Hopefully this time they don't let another Gates or Jobs swipe the technology.

  • Report this Comment On April 19, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Osiris39 wrote:

    Interesting! Robots making robots. This is an industry that can develop itself. Will Smith will eventually be proved right. I watched "I Robot" too. Hopefully it is Will Smith's view of the future and not Arnold Swartzeneggar's "Terminator"....or the vew of the 'nanobots' in the "StarGate-SG1" series...or the reduction of our species to be servants of the new electronic sentient species that is now being created. Frank Herbert and his children wrote of this in his "Dune" books, with the futurist of his books following a law: "Thou shall not make a machine in the image of a man!".

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2358686, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/29/2016 9:37:35 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 21 minutes ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,143.45 -195.79 -1.07%
S&P 500 2,151.13 -20.24 -0.93%
NASD 5,269.15 -49.39 -0.93%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/29/2016 4:01 PM
DDD $17.66 Down -0.07 -0.39%
3D Systems CAPS Rating: ****
SSYS $23.95 Up +0.10 +0.42%
Stratasys CAPS Rating: ****
XRX $10.18 Up +0.10 +0.99%
Xerox CAPS Rating: ****
IRBT $43.84 Down -0.19 -0.43%
iRobot CAPS Rating: *****